Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs

Nicole Kimmes, Tarnjit S. Saini, Lucinda R. Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Digital technology is becoming more common in dental practices. Indirect digitization of radiographs can be an alternative to direct digital systems. This study was designed to evaluate intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreement of proximal caries diagnosis on bitewing radiographs before and after indirect digitization. Four bitewing radiographs were obtained from 50 dental students. Conventional films were digitized with a flatbed scanner at 150 and 300 dpi. Three observers recorded the presence and depth of caries on 1,642 proximal surfaces for the conventional and digitized radiographs. Radiographs were evaluated twice (one week apart), using each viewing technique. Intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreement (Kw) were determined. The intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreements of proximal caries diagnosis on bitewing radiographs before and after indirect digitization were moderate to good.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-185
Number of pages4
JournalGeneral Dentistry
Volume54
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Students
Tooth
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs. / Kimmes, Nicole; Saini, Tarnjit S.; Carroll, Lucinda R.

In: General Dentistry, Vol. 54, No. 3, 05.2006, p. 182-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kimmes, Nicole ; Saini, Tarnjit S. ; Carroll, Lucinda R. / Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs. In: General Dentistry. 2006 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 182-185.
@article{78a4fde37aec4a34afcb9689d8c31efb,
title = "Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs",
abstract = "Digital technology is becoming more common in dental practices. Indirect digitization of radiographs can be an alternative to direct digital systems. This study was designed to evaluate intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreement of proximal caries diagnosis on bitewing radiographs before and after indirect digitization. Four bitewing radiographs were obtained from 50 dental students. Conventional films were digitized with a flatbed scanner at 150 and 300 dpi. Three observers recorded the presence and depth of caries on 1,642 proximal surfaces for the conventional and digitized radiographs. Radiographs were evaluated twice (one week apart), using each viewing technique. Intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreement (Kw) were determined. The intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreements of proximal caries diagnosis on bitewing radiographs before and after indirect digitization were moderate to good.",
author = "Nicole Kimmes and Saini, {Tarnjit S.} and Carroll, {Lucinda R.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "182--185",
journal = "General Dentistry",
issn = "0363-6771",
publisher = "Academy of General Dentistry",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs

AU - Kimmes, Nicole

AU - Saini, Tarnjit S.

AU - Carroll, Lucinda R.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Digital technology is becoming more common in dental practices. Indirect digitization of radiographs can be an alternative to direct digital systems. This study was designed to evaluate intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreement of proximal caries diagnosis on bitewing radiographs before and after indirect digitization. Four bitewing radiographs were obtained from 50 dental students. Conventional films were digitized with a flatbed scanner at 150 and 300 dpi. Three observers recorded the presence and depth of caries on 1,642 proximal surfaces for the conventional and digitized radiographs. Radiographs were evaluated twice (one week apart), using each viewing technique. Intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreement (Kw) were determined. The intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreements of proximal caries diagnosis on bitewing radiographs before and after indirect digitization were moderate to good.

AB - Digital technology is becoming more common in dental practices. Indirect digitization of radiographs can be an alternative to direct digital systems. This study was designed to evaluate intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreement of proximal caries diagnosis on bitewing radiographs before and after indirect digitization. Four bitewing radiographs were obtained from 50 dental students. Conventional films were digitized with a flatbed scanner at 150 and 300 dpi. Three observers recorded the presence and depth of caries on 1,642 proximal surfaces for the conventional and digitized radiographs. Radiographs were evaluated twice (one week apart), using each viewing technique. Intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreement (Kw) were determined. The intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-technique agreements of proximal caries diagnosis on bitewing radiographs before and after indirect digitization were moderate to good.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745375020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745375020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16776410

AN - SCOPUS:33745375020

VL - 54

SP - 182

EP - 185

JO - General Dentistry

JF - General Dentistry

SN - 0363-6771

IS - 3

ER -