Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris

Tyson O. Curtis, Christine Sedgley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device (VPro StreamClean System [VSS], Vista Dental Products, Racine, WI) with conventional needle irrigation when used as a final irrigation procedure to debride the apical region of the root canal. The null hypothesis that there is no difference was tested. Methods: Root canals of matched pairs (N = 20) of extracted human teeth were prepared to an apical size of 36/.04 using Profile series 29/.04 rotary files (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK) with 6% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation. One tooth of each pair was randomly assigned to receive final irrigation with either VSS or conventional needle irrigation. The gauge of the needle (#30), the irrigation cycles (ie, 5 mL NaOCl, 5 mL 15% EDTA, and 5 mL NaOCl), the irrigant flow rate (5 mL/min), and needle depth placement (1 mm from the working length [WL]) were experimental constants. Serial sections were obtained at 1 and 3 mm from the WL, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and viewed at 100× magnification for the presence of debris. The percentage of debris in the canal lumen after VSS or conventional needle irrigation was compared by using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Results: There was significantly less debris in the VSS group compared with the conventional needle irrigation group at the 1-mm level (1.50% [VSS] vs 9.90% [conventional needle irrigation], P =.0001) and the 3-mm level (0.45% [VSS] vs 5.16% [conventional needle irrigation], P =.0014). The null hypothesis was rejected. Conclusions: Final irrigation with the VSS compared with conventional needle irrigation delivery resulted in significantly less debris present in root canals at 1 and 3 mm from the WL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1261-1264
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume38
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Dental Pulp Cavity
Ultrasonics
Needles
Equipment and Supplies
Tooth
Sodium Hypochlorite
Hematoxylin
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Edetic Acid

Keywords

  • Apical
  • debris
  • irrigation
  • root canal
  • ultrasonic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris. / Curtis, Tyson O.; Sedgley, Christine.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 38, No. 9, 09.2012, p. 1261-1264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bee2b025934a404b98ace260a11b7fb5,
title = "Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris",
abstract = "Introduction: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device (VPro StreamClean System [VSS], Vista Dental Products, Racine, WI) with conventional needle irrigation when used as a final irrigation procedure to debride the apical region of the root canal. The null hypothesis that there is no difference was tested. Methods: Root canals of matched pairs (N = 20) of extracted human teeth were prepared to an apical size of 36/.04 using Profile series 29/.04 rotary files (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK) with 6{\%} sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation. One tooth of each pair was randomly assigned to receive final irrigation with either VSS or conventional needle irrigation. The gauge of the needle (#30), the irrigation cycles (ie, 5 mL NaOCl, 5 mL 15{\%} EDTA, and 5 mL NaOCl), the irrigant flow rate (5 mL/min), and needle depth placement (1 mm from the working length [WL]) were experimental constants. Serial sections were obtained at 1 and 3 mm from the WL, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and viewed at 100× magnification for the presence of debris. The percentage of debris in the canal lumen after VSS or conventional needle irrigation was compared by using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Results: There was significantly less debris in the VSS group compared with the conventional needle irrigation group at the 1-mm level (1.50{\%} [VSS] vs 9.90{\%} [conventional needle irrigation], P =.0001) and the 3-mm level (0.45{\%} [VSS] vs 5.16{\%} [conventional needle irrigation], P =.0014). The null hypothesis was rejected. Conclusions: Final irrigation with the VSS compared with conventional needle irrigation delivery resulted in significantly less debris present in root canals at 1 and 3 mm from the WL.",
keywords = "Apical, debris, irrigation, root canal, ultrasonic",
author = "Curtis, {Tyson O.} and Christine Sedgley",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1261--1264",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris

AU - Curtis, Tyson O.

AU - Sedgley, Christine

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Introduction: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device (VPro StreamClean System [VSS], Vista Dental Products, Racine, WI) with conventional needle irrigation when used as a final irrigation procedure to debride the apical region of the root canal. The null hypothesis that there is no difference was tested. Methods: Root canals of matched pairs (N = 20) of extracted human teeth were prepared to an apical size of 36/.04 using Profile series 29/.04 rotary files (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK) with 6% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation. One tooth of each pair was randomly assigned to receive final irrigation with either VSS or conventional needle irrigation. The gauge of the needle (#30), the irrigation cycles (ie, 5 mL NaOCl, 5 mL 15% EDTA, and 5 mL NaOCl), the irrigant flow rate (5 mL/min), and needle depth placement (1 mm from the working length [WL]) were experimental constants. Serial sections were obtained at 1 and 3 mm from the WL, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and viewed at 100× magnification for the presence of debris. The percentage of debris in the canal lumen after VSS or conventional needle irrigation was compared by using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Results: There was significantly less debris in the VSS group compared with the conventional needle irrigation group at the 1-mm level (1.50% [VSS] vs 9.90% [conventional needle irrigation], P =.0001) and the 3-mm level (0.45% [VSS] vs 5.16% [conventional needle irrigation], P =.0014). The null hypothesis was rejected. Conclusions: Final irrigation with the VSS compared with conventional needle irrigation delivery resulted in significantly less debris present in root canals at 1 and 3 mm from the WL.

AB - Introduction: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device (VPro StreamClean System [VSS], Vista Dental Products, Racine, WI) with conventional needle irrigation when used as a final irrigation procedure to debride the apical region of the root canal. The null hypothesis that there is no difference was tested. Methods: Root canals of matched pairs (N = 20) of extracted human teeth were prepared to an apical size of 36/.04 using Profile series 29/.04 rotary files (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK) with 6% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation. One tooth of each pair was randomly assigned to receive final irrigation with either VSS or conventional needle irrigation. The gauge of the needle (#30), the irrigation cycles (ie, 5 mL NaOCl, 5 mL 15% EDTA, and 5 mL NaOCl), the irrigant flow rate (5 mL/min), and needle depth placement (1 mm from the working length [WL]) were experimental constants. Serial sections were obtained at 1 and 3 mm from the WL, stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and viewed at 100× magnification for the presence of debris. The percentage of debris in the canal lumen after VSS or conventional needle irrigation was compared by using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Results: There was significantly less debris in the VSS group compared with the conventional needle irrigation group at the 1-mm level (1.50% [VSS] vs 9.90% [conventional needle irrigation], P =.0001) and the 3-mm level (0.45% [VSS] vs 5.16% [conventional needle irrigation], P =.0014). The null hypothesis was rejected. Conclusions: Final irrigation with the VSS compared with conventional needle irrigation delivery resulted in significantly less debris present in root canals at 1 and 3 mm from the WL.

KW - Apical

KW - debris

KW - irrigation

KW - root canal

KW - ultrasonic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865019465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865019465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.012

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 22892747

AN - SCOPUS:84865019465

VL - 38

SP - 1261

EP - 1264

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 9

ER -