Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the Spine

Vaishali Phalke, Sachin Gujar, Douglas J. Quint

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-248
Number of pages8
JournalNeuroimaging Clinics of North America
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Spine
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR : Imaging of the Spine. / Phalke, Vaishali; Gujar, Sachin; Quint, Douglas J.

In: Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, Vol. 16, No. 2, 05.2006, p. 241-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Phalke, Vaishali ; Gujar, Sachin ; Quint, Douglas J. / Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR : Imaging of the Spine. In: Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 2006 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 241-248.
@article{be838d99eb394733901adba7290acb16,
title = "Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the Spine",
abstract = "3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.",
author = "Vaishali Phalke and Sachin Gujar and Quint, {Douglas J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "241--248",
journal = "Neuroimaging Clinics of North America",
issn = "1052-5149",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR

T2 - Imaging of the Spine

AU - Phalke, Vaishali

AU - Gujar, Sachin

AU - Quint, Douglas J.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - 3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.

AB - 3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747144129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747144129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 16731363

AN - SCOPUS:33747144129

VL - 16

SP - 241

EP - 248

JO - Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

JF - Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

SN - 1052-5149

IS - 2

ER -