Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the Spine

Vaishali V. Phalke; Sachin Gujar; Douglas J. Quint

doi:10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005

Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the Spine

Vaishali V. Phalke, Sachin Gujar, Douglas J. Quint

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	241-248
Number of pages	8
Journal	Neuroimaging Clinics of North America
Volume	16
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005
State	Published - May 2006
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Clinical Neurology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005

Cite this

@article{be838d99eb394733901adba7290acb16,

title = "Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the Spine",

abstract = "3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.",

author = "Phalke, {Vaishali V.} and Sachin Gujar and Quint, {Douglas J.}",

year = "2006",

month = may,

doi = "10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "16",

pages = "241--248",

journal = "Neuroimaging Clinics of North America",

issn = "1052-5149",

publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR

T2 - Imaging of the Spine

AU - Phalke, Vaishali V.

AU - Gujar, Sachin

AU - Quint, Douglas J.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - 3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.

AB - 3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747144129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747144129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.nic.2006.02.005

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16731363

AN - SCOPUS:33747144129

SN - 1052-5149

VL - 16

SP - 241

EP - 248

JO - Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

JF - Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

IS - 2

ER -

Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the Spine

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this