Comparison of 2.6- and 1.4-mm imaging probes for confocal laser endomicroscopy of the urinary tract

Winifred Adams, Katherine Wu, Jen-Jane Liu, Shelly Teng Teng Hsiao, Kristin C. Jensen, Joseph C. Liao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an emerging technology for dynamic, in vivo imaging of the urinary tract with micron-scale resolution. We conducted a comparative analysis of pCLE with a 2.6-mm probe and a 1.4-mm probe that is compatible with flexible endoscopes. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven patients scheduled for bladder tumor resection were recruited. pCLE imaging was performed using 2.6- and 1.4-mm probes. Image quality with the different probes was examined and further compared with standard histopathology. Results: Images with the 2.6-mm probe have better resolution of cell morphology. The 1.4-mm probe has a wider field of view and better view of microarchitecture. While image quality with the 2.6-mm probe is superior, the 1.4-mm probe is compatible with flexible cystoscopy and maneuverability is maintained, enabling imaging of areas of the bladder that were previously challenging to access with the larger probe. Conclusions: The optical specifications of the 2.6-mm probe are more suitable for distinguishing urinary tract histopathology. Further design optimization to improve resolution and additional validation of the diagnostic accuracy of the smaller probe are needed to help extend application of pCLE for optical biopsy of the upper and lower urinary tract.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)917-921
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urinary Tract
Lasers
Cystoscopy
Endoscopes
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Urinary Bladder
Technology
Biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Comparison of 2.6- and 1.4-mm imaging probes for confocal laser endomicroscopy of the urinary tract. / Adams, Winifred; Wu, Katherine; Liu, Jen-Jane; Hsiao, Shelly Teng Teng; Jensen, Kristin C.; Liao, Joseph C.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 25, No. 6, 01.06.2011, p. 917-921.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Adams, Winifred ; Wu, Katherine ; Liu, Jen-Jane ; Hsiao, Shelly Teng Teng ; Jensen, Kristin C. ; Liao, Joseph C. / Comparison of 2.6- and 1.4-mm imaging probes for confocal laser endomicroscopy of the urinary tract. In: Journal of Endourology. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 917-921.
@article{c6fed8fbd5534dc9b7e4377924667e1c,
title = "Comparison of 2.6- and 1.4-mm imaging probes for confocal laser endomicroscopy of the urinary tract",
abstract = "Introduction: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an emerging technology for dynamic, in vivo imaging of the urinary tract with micron-scale resolution. We conducted a comparative analysis of pCLE with a 2.6-mm probe and a 1.4-mm probe that is compatible with flexible endoscopes. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven patients scheduled for bladder tumor resection were recruited. pCLE imaging was performed using 2.6- and 1.4-mm probes. Image quality with the different probes was examined and further compared with standard histopathology. Results: Images with the 2.6-mm probe have better resolution of cell morphology. The 1.4-mm probe has a wider field of view and better view of microarchitecture. While image quality with the 2.6-mm probe is superior, the 1.4-mm probe is compatible with flexible cystoscopy and maneuverability is maintained, enabling imaging of areas of the bladder that were previously challenging to access with the larger probe. Conclusions: The optical specifications of the 2.6-mm probe are more suitable for distinguishing urinary tract histopathology. Further design optimization to improve resolution and additional validation of the diagnostic accuracy of the smaller probe are needed to help extend application of pCLE for optical biopsy of the upper and lower urinary tract.",
author = "Winifred Adams and Katherine Wu and Jen-Jane Liu and Hsiao, {Shelly Teng Teng} and Jensen, {Kristin C.} and Liao, {Joseph C.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2010.0686",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "917--921",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 2.6- and 1.4-mm imaging probes for confocal laser endomicroscopy of the urinary tract

AU - Adams, Winifred

AU - Wu, Katherine

AU - Liu, Jen-Jane

AU - Hsiao, Shelly Teng Teng

AU - Jensen, Kristin C.

AU - Liao, Joseph C.

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Introduction: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an emerging technology for dynamic, in vivo imaging of the urinary tract with micron-scale resolution. We conducted a comparative analysis of pCLE with a 2.6-mm probe and a 1.4-mm probe that is compatible with flexible endoscopes. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven patients scheduled for bladder tumor resection were recruited. pCLE imaging was performed using 2.6- and 1.4-mm probes. Image quality with the different probes was examined and further compared with standard histopathology. Results: Images with the 2.6-mm probe have better resolution of cell morphology. The 1.4-mm probe has a wider field of view and better view of microarchitecture. While image quality with the 2.6-mm probe is superior, the 1.4-mm probe is compatible with flexible cystoscopy and maneuverability is maintained, enabling imaging of areas of the bladder that were previously challenging to access with the larger probe. Conclusions: The optical specifications of the 2.6-mm probe are more suitable for distinguishing urinary tract histopathology. Further design optimization to improve resolution and additional validation of the diagnostic accuracy of the smaller probe are needed to help extend application of pCLE for optical biopsy of the upper and lower urinary tract.

AB - Introduction: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an emerging technology for dynamic, in vivo imaging of the urinary tract with micron-scale resolution. We conducted a comparative analysis of pCLE with a 2.6-mm probe and a 1.4-mm probe that is compatible with flexible endoscopes. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven patients scheduled for bladder tumor resection were recruited. pCLE imaging was performed using 2.6- and 1.4-mm probes. Image quality with the different probes was examined and further compared with standard histopathology. Results: Images with the 2.6-mm probe have better resolution of cell morphology. The 1.4-mm probe has a wider field of view and better view of microarchitecture. While image quality with the 2.6-mm probe is superior, the 1.4-mm probe is compatible with flexible cystoscopy and maneuverability is maintained, enabling imaging of areas of the bladder that were previously challenging to access with the larger probe. Conclusions: The optical specifications of the 2.6-mm probe are more suitable for distinguishing urinary tract histopathology. Further design optimization to improve resolution and additional validation of the diagnostic accuracy of the smaller probe are needed to help extend application of pCLE for optical biopsy of the upper and lower urinary tract.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959302585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959302585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2010.0686

DO - 10.1089/end.2010.0686

M3 - Article

C2 - 21568756

AN - SCOPUS:79959302585

VL - 25

SP - 917

EP - 921

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 6

ER -