Comparison of 2.6- and 1.4-mm imaging probes for confocal laser endomicroscopy of the urinary tract

Winifred Adams, Katherine Wu, Jen Jane Liu, Shelly Teng Teng Hsiao, Kristin C. Jensen, Joseph C. Liao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations


Introduction: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an emerging technology for dynamic, in vivo imaging of the urinary tract with micron-scale resolution. We conducted a comparative analysis of pCLE with a 2.6-mm probe and a 1.4-mm probe that is compatible with flexible endoscopes. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven patients scheduled for bladder tumor resection were recruited. pCLE imaging was performed using 2.6- and 1.4-mm probes. Image quality with the different probes was examined and further compared with standard histopathology. Results: Images with the 2.6-mm probe have better resolution of cell morphology. The 1.4-mm probe has a wider field of view and better view of microarchitecture. While image quality with the 2.6-mm probe is superior, the 1.4-mm probe is compatible with flexible cystoscopy and maneuverability is maintained, enabling imaging of areas of the bladder that were previously challenging to access with the larger probe. Conclusions: The optical specifications of the 2.6-mm probe are more suitable for distinguishing urinary tract histopathology. Further design optimization to improve resolution and additional validation of the diagnostic accuracy of the smaller probe are needed to help extend application of pCLE for optical biopsy of the upper and lower urinary tract.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)917-921
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endourology
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of 2.6- and 1.4-mm imaging probes for confocal laser endomicroscopy of the urinary tract'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this