Comparing surgeon outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis

Timothy Smith, Jess C. Mace, Luke Rudmik, Rodney J. Schlosser, Peter H. Hwang, Jeremiah A. Alt, Zachary M. Soler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) outcomes for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) between medical centers to determine if differences in quality-of-life outcomes were detectable. In addition, we sought to identify significant, independent cofactors toward the development of an ESS-specific risk-adjustment model so that ESS outcomes may be appropriately compared between institutions and healthcare providers. Study Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort. Methods: Study participants electing ESS for CRS were enrolled and randomly selected in equal numbers from three academic clinical practices in North America between April 2011 and May 2015. The magnitude of average 6-month postoperative improvement in patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) was compared between enrollment sites using multivariate linear regression modeling. Results: A total of 228 participants met inclusion criteria and were included for final analyses (n = 76 per site). The prevalence of septal deviation/septoplasty and oral corticosteroid-dependent conditions was significantly different between enrollment sites (P ≤ 0.004). Each enrollment site generated significant within-subject improvement across all PROMs after ESS (P <0.001); however, average unadjusted magnitudes of improvement were significantly different between sites for the primary outcome measure. After controlling for baseline PROMs, septal deviation, steroid-dependent conditions, and medication use variables, enrollment site was no longer associated with significant outcome differences (P = 0.535). Conclusion: Comparison of surgeon outcomes of ESS is feasible and must take into account a number of baseline patient characteristics. Further studies will be critical toward developing an ESS-specific risk-adjustment model and enabling a robust comparison of surgeon outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalLaryngoscope
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Risk Adjustment
North America
Surgeons
Health Personnel
Linear Models
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Steroids
Quality of Life
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Outcome assessment (healthcare)
  • Patient outcome assessment
  • Quality improvement
  • Quality of life
  • Sinusitis
  • Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Smith, T., Mace, J. C., Rudmik, L., Schlosser, R. J., Hwang, P. H., Alt, J. A., & Soler, Z. M. (Accepted/In press). Comparing surgeon outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26095

Comparing surgeon outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. / Smith, Timothy; Mace, Jess C.; Rudmik, Luke; Schlosser, Rodney J.; Hwang, Peter H.; Alt, Jeremiah A.; Soler, Zachary M.

In: Laryngoscope, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Timothy ; Mace, Jess C. ; Rudmik, Luke ; Schlosser, Rodney J. ; Hwang, Peter H. ; Alt, Jeremiah A. ; Soler, Zachary M. / Comparing surgeon outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. In: Laryngoscope. 2016.
@article{bfd3ebae9bc0464293c9c21186ab2ea7,
title = "Comparing surgeon outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) outcomes for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) between medical centers to determine if differences in quality-of-life outcomes were detectable. In addition, we sought to identify significant, independent cofactors toward the development of an ESS-specific risk-adjustment model so that ESS outcomes may be appropriately compared between institutions and healthcare providers. Study Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort. Methods: Study participants electing ESS for CRS were enrolled and randomly selected in equal numbers from three academic clinical practices in North America between April 2011 and May 2015. The magnitude of average 6-month postoperative improvement in patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) was compared between enrollment sites using multivariate linear regression modeling. Results: A total of 228 participants met inclusion criteria and were included for final analyses (n = 76 per site). The prevalence of septal deviation/septoplasty and oral corticosteroid-dependent conditions was significantly different between enrollment sites (P ≤ 0.004). Each enrollment site generated significant within-subject improvement across all PROMs after ESS (P <0.001); however, average unadjusted magnitudes of improvement were significantly different between sites for the primary outcome measure. After controlling for baseline PROMs, septal deviation, steroid-dependent conditions, and medication use variables, enrollment site was no longer associated with significant outcome differences (P = 0.535). Conclusion: Comparison of surgeon outcomes of ESS is feasible and must take into account a number of baseline patient characteristics. Further studies will be critical toward developing an ESS-specific risk-adjustment model and enabling a robust comparison of surgeon outcomes.",
keywords = "Outcome assessment (healthcare), Patient outcome assessment, Quality improvement, Quality of life, Sinusitis, Surgeons",
author = "Timothy Smith and Mace, {Jess C.} and Luke Rudmik and Schlosser, {Rodney J.} and Hwang, {Peter H.} and Alt, {Jeremiah A.} and Soler, {Zachary M.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/lary.26095",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing surgeon outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis

AU - Smith, Timothy

AU - Mace, Jess C.

AU - Rudmik, Luke

AU - Schlosser, Rodney J.

AU - Hwang, Peter H.

AU - Alt, Jeremiah A.

AU - Soler, Zachary M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) outcomes for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) between medical centers to determine if differences in quality-of-life outcomes were detectable. In addition, we sought to identify significant, independent cofactors toward the development of an ESS-specific risk-adjustment model so that ESS outcomes may be appropriately compared between institutions and healthcare providers. Study Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort. Methods: Study participants electing ESS for CRS were enrolled and randomly selected in equal numbers from three academic clinical practices in North America between April 2011 and May 2015. The magnitude of average 6-month postoperative improvement in patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) was compared between enrollment sites using multivariate linear regression modeling. Results: A total of 228 participants met inclusion criteria and were included for final analyses (n = 76 per site). The prevalence of septal deviation/septoplasty and oral corticosteroid-dependent conditions was significantly different between enrollment sites (P ≤ 0.004). Each enrollment site generated significant within-subject improvement across all PROMs after ESS (P <0.001); however, average unadjusted magnitudes of improvement were significantly different between sites for the primary outcome measure. After controlling for baseline PROMs, septal deviation, steroid-dependent conditions, and medication use variables, enrollment site was no longer associated with significant outcome differences (P = 0.535). Conclusion: Comparison of surgeon outcomes of ESS is feasible and must take into account a number of baseline patient characteristics. Further studies will be critical toward developing an ESS-specific risk-adjustment model and enabling a robust comparison of surgeon outcomes.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) outcomes for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) between medical centers to determine if differences in quality-of-life outcomes were detectable. In addition, we sought to identify significant, independent cofactors toward the development of an ESS-specific risk-adjustment model so that ESS outcomes may be appropriately compared between institutions and healthcare providers. Study Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort. Methods: Study participants electing ESS for CRS were enrolled and randomly selected in equal numbers from three academic clinical practices in North America between April 2011 and May 2015. The magnitude of average 6-month postoperative improvement in patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) was compared between enrollment sites using multivariate linear regression modeling. Results: A total of 228 participants met inclusion criteria and were included for final analyses (n = 76 per site). The prevalence of septal deviation/septoplasty and oral corticosteroid-dependent conditions was significantly different between enrollment sites (P ≤ 0.004). Each enrollment site generated significant within-subject improvement across all PROMs after ESS (P <0.001); however, average unadjusted magnitudes of improvement were significantly different between sites for the primary outcome measure. After controlling for baseline PROMs, septal deviation, steroid-dependent conditions, and medication use variables, enrollment site was no longer associated with significant outcome differences (P = 0.535). Conclusion: Comparison of surgeon outcomes of ESS is feasible and must take into account a number of baseline patient characteristics. Further studies will be critical toward developing an ESS-specific risk-adjustment model and enabling a robust comparison of surgeon outcomes.

KW - Outcome assessment (healthcare)

KW - Patient outcome assessment

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Quality of life

KW - Sinusitis

KW - Surgeons

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978721559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978721559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.26095

DO - 10.1002/lary.26095

M3 - Article

C2 - 27298069

AN - SCOPUS:84978721559

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

ER -