Comparing Scribed and Non-scribed Outpatient Progress Notes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Working with scribes can reduce provider documentation time, but few studies have examined how scribes affect clinical notes. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we examine over 50,000 outpatient progress notes written with and without scribe assistance by 70 providers across 27 specialties in 2017-2018. We find scribed notes were consistently longer than those written without scribe assistance, with most additional text coming from note templates. Scribed notes were also more likely to contain certain templated lists, such as the patient's medications or past medical history. However, there was significant variation in how working with scribes affected a provider's mix of typed, templated, and copied note text, suggesting providers adapt their documentation workflows to varying degrees when working with scribes. These results suggest working with scribes may contribute to note bloat, but that providers' individual documentation workflows, including their note templates, may have a large impact on scribed note contents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1059-1068
Number of pages10
JournalAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Volume2021
StatePublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Scribed and Non-scribed Outpatient Progress Notes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this