Comparing Emergency Department Use among Medicaid and Commercial Patients Using All-Payer All-Claims Data

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

The high rate of emergency department (ED) use by Medicaid patients is not fully understood. The objective of this paper is (1) to provide context for ED service use by comparing Medicaid and commercial patients' differences across ED and non-ED health service use, and (2) to assess the extent to which Medicaid-commercial differences in ED use can be explained by observable factors in administrative data. Statistical decomposition methods were applied to ED, mental health, and inpatient care using 2011-2013 Medicaid and commercial insurance claims from the Oregon All Payer All Claims database. Demographics, comorbidities, health services use, and neighborhood characteristics accounted for 44% of the Medicaid-commercial difference in ED use, compared to 83% for mental health care and 75% for inpatient care. This suggests that relative to mental health and inpatient care, a large portion of ED use cannot be explained by administrative data. Models that further accounted for patient access to different primary care physicians explained an additional 8% of the Medicaid-commercial difference in ED use, suggesting that the quality of primary care may influence ED use. The remaining unexplained difference suggests that appropriately reducing ED use remains a credible target for policy makers, although success may require knowledge about patients' perceptions and behaviors as well as social determinants of health.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages271-277
Number of pages7
JournalPopulation Health Management
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Medicaid
Hospital Emergency Service
Inpatients
Mental Health
Delivery of Health Care
Health Services
Social Determinants of Health
Quality of Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Insurance
Administrative Personnel
Comorbidity
Primary Health Care
Demography
Databases

Keywords

  • Emergency Department Use
  • Medicaid Patients
  • Non-Linear Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{81440fac0b6e405fbf9342683d02475d,
title = "Comparing Emergency Department Use among Medicaid and Commercial Patients Using All-Payer All-Claims Data",
abstract = "The high rate of emergency department (ED) use by Medicaid patients is not fully understood. The objective of this paper is (1) to provide context for ED service use by comparing Medicaid and commercial patients' differences across ED and non-ED health service use, and (2) to assess the extent to which Medicaid-commercial differences in ED use can be explained by observable factors in administrative data. Statistical decomposition methods were applied to ED, mental health, and inpatient care using 2011-2013 Medicaid and commercial insurance claims from the Oregon All Payer All Claims database. Demographics, comorbidities, health services use, and neighborhood characteristics accounted for 44% of the Medicaid-commercial difference in ED use, compared to 83% for mental health care and 75% for inpatient care. This suggests that relative to mental health and inpatient care, a large portion of ED use cannot be explained by administrative data. Models that further accounted for patient access to different primary care physicians explained an additional 8% of the Medicaid-commercial difference in ED use, suggesting that the quality of primary care may influence ED use. The remaining unexplained difference suggests that appropriately reducing ED use remains a credible target for policy makers, although success may require knowledge about patients' perceptions and behaviors as well as social determinants of health.",
keywords = "Emergency Department Use, Medicaid Patients, Non-Linear Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition",
author = "Hyunjee Kim and McConnell, {K. John} and Sun, {Benjamin C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1089/pop.2016.0075",
volume = "20",
pages = "271--277",
journal = "Population Health Management",
issn = "1942-7891",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Emergency Department Use among Medicaid and Commercial Patients Using All-Payer All-Claims Data

AU - Kim,Hyunjee

AU - McConnell,K. John

AU - Sun,Benjamin C.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - The high rate of emergency department (ED) use by Medicaid patients is not fully understood. The objective of this paper is (1) to provide context for ED service use by comparing Medicaid and commercial patients' differences across ED and non-ED health service use, and (2) to assess the extent to which Medicaid-commercial differences in ED use can be explained by observable factors in administrative data. Statistical decomposition methods were applied to ED, mental health, and inpatient care using 2011-2013 Medicaid and commercial insurance claims from the Oregon All Payer All Claims database. Demographics, comorbidities, health services use, and neighborhood characteristics accounted for 44% of the Medicaid-commercial difference in ED use, compared to 83% for mental health care and 75% for inpatient care. This suggests that relative to mental health and inpatient care, a large portion of ED use cannot be explained by administrative data. Models that further accounted for patient access to different primary care physicians explained an additional 8% of the Medicaid-commercial difference in ED use, suggesting that the quality of primary care may influence ED use. The remaining unexplained difference suggests that appropriately reducing ED use remains a credible target for policy makers, although success may require knowledge about patients' perceptions and behaviors as well as social determinants of health.

AB - The high rate of emergency department (ED) use by Medicaid patients is not fully understood. The objective of this paper is (1) to provide context for ED service use by comparing Medicaid and commercial patients' differences across ED and non-ED health service use, and (2) to assess the extent to which Medicaid-commercial differences in ED use can be explained by observable factors in administrative data. Statistical decomposition methods were applied to ED, mental health, and inpatient care using 2011-2013 Medicaid and commercial insurance claims from the Oregon All Payer All Claims database. Demographics, comorbidities, health services use, and neighborhood characteristics accounted for 44% of the Medicaid-commercial difference in ED use, compared to 83% for mental health care and 75% for inpatient care. This suggests that relative to mental health and inpatient care, a large portion of ED use cannot be explained by administrative data. Models that further accounted for patient access to different primary care physicians explained an additional 8% of the Medicaid-commercial difference in ED use, suggesting that the quality of primary care may influence ED use. The remaining unexplained difference suggests that appropriately reducing ED use remains a credible target for policy makers, although success may require knowledge about patients' perceptions and behaviors as well as social determinants of health.

KW - Emergency Department Use

KW - Medicaid Patients

KW - Non-Linear Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026329232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026329232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/pop.2016.0075

DO - 10.1089/pop.2016.0075

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 271

EP - 277

JO - Population Health Management

T2 - Population Health Management

JF - Population Health Management

SN - 1942-7891

IS - 4

ER -