Comparing directed functional connectivity between groups with confirmatory subgrouping GIMME

Teague Rhine Henry, Eric Feczko, Michaela Cordova, Eric Earl, Sandra Williams, Joel Nigg, Damien Fair, Kathleen M. Gates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Connectivity modeling in functional neuroimaging has become widely used method of analysis for understanding functional architecture. One method for deriving directed connectivity models is Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME; Gates and Molenaar, 2012). GIMME looks for commonalities across the sample to detect signal from noise and arrive at edges that exist across the majority in the group (“group-level edges”) and individual-level edges. In this way, GIMME obtains generalizable results via the group-level edges while also allowing for between subject heterogeneity in connectivity, moving the field closer to obtaining reliable personalized connectivity maps. In this article, we present a novel extension of GIMME, confirmatory subgrouping GIMME, which estimates subgroup-level edges for a priori known groups (e.g. typically developing controls vs. clinical group). Detecting edges that consistently exist for individuals within predefined subgroups aids in interpretation of the heterogeneity in connectivity maps and allows for subgroup-specific inferences. We describe this algorithm, as well as several methods to examine the results. We present an empirical example that finds similarities and differences in resting state functional connectivity among four groups of children: typically developing controls (TDC), children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), children with Inattentive (ADHD-I) and Combined (ADHD-C) Type ADHD. Findings from this study suggest common involvement of the left Broca's area in all the clinical groups, as well as several unique patterns of functional connectivity specific to a given disorder. Overall, the current approach and proof of principle findings highlight a novel and reliable tool for capturing heterogeneity in complex mental health disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)642-653
Number of pages12
JournalNeuroImage
Volume188
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Functional Neuroimaging
Mental Disorders
Mental Health
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Broca Area

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Comparing directed functional connectivity between groups with confirmatory subgrouping GIMME. / Henry, Teague Rhine; Feczko, Eric; Cordova, Michaela; Earl, Eric; Williams, Sandra; Nigg, Joel; Fair, Damien; Gates, Kathleen M.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 188, 01.03.2019, p. 642-653.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henry, Teague Rhine ; Feczko, Eric ; Cordova, Michaela ; Earl, Eric ; Williams, Sandra ; Nigg, Joel ; Fair, Damien ; Gates, Kathleen M. / Comparing directed functional connectivity between groups with confirmatory subgrouping GIMME. In: NeuroImage. 2019 ; Vol. 188. pp. 642-653.
@article{47ab1cddebc94d97816f5079394126b1,
title = "Comparing directed functional connectivity between groups with confirmatory subgrouping GIMME",
abstract = "Connectivity modeling in functional neuroimaging has become widely used method of analysis for understanding functional architecture. One method for deriving directed connectivity models is Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME; Gates and Molenaar, 2012). GIMME looks for commonalities across the sample to detect signal from noise and arrive at edges that exist across the majority in the group (“group-level edges”) and individual-level edges. In this way, GIMME obtains generalizable results via the group-level edges while also allowing for between subject heterogeneity in connectivity, moving the field closer to obtaining reliable personalized connectivity maps. In this article, we present a novel extension of GIMME, confirmatory subgrouping GIMME, which estimates subgroup-level edges for a priori known groups (e.g. typically developing controls vs. clinical group). Detecting edges that consistently exist for individuals within predefined subgroups aids in interpretation of the heterogeneity in connectivity maps and allows for subgroup-specific inferences. We describe this algorithm, as well as several methods to examine the results. We present an empirical example that finds similarities and differences in resting state functional connectivity among four groups of children: typically developing controls (TDC), children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), children with Inattentive (ADHD-I) and Combined (ADHD-C) Type ADHD. Findings from this study suggest common involvement of the left Broca's area in all the clinical groups, as well as several unique patterns of functional connectivity specific to a given disorder. Overall, the current approach and proof of principle findings highlight a novel and reliable tool for capturing heterogeneity in complex mental health disorders.",
author = "Henry, {Teague Rhine} and Eric Feczko and Michaela Cordova and Eric Earl and Sandra Williams and Joel Nigg and Damien Fair and Gates, {Kathleen M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "188",
pages = "642--653",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing directed functional connectivity between groups with confirmatory subgrouping GIMME

AU - Henry, Teague Rhine

AU - Feczko, Eric

AU - Cordova, Michaela

AU - Earl, Eric

AU - Williams, Sandra

AU - Nigg, Joel

AU - Fair, Damien

AU - Gates, Kathleen M.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Connectivity modeling in functional neuroimaging has become widely used method of analysis for understanding functional architecture. One method for deriving directed connectivity models is Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME; Gates and Molenaar, 2012). GIMME looks for commonalities across the sample to detect signal from noise and arrive at edges that exist across the majority in the group (“group-level edges”) and individual-level edges. In this way, GIMME obtains generalizable results via the group-level edges while also allowing for between subject heterogeneity in connectivity, moving the field closer to obtaining reliable personalized connectivity maps. In this article, we present a novel extension of GIMME, confirmatory subgrouping GIMME, which estimates subgroup-level edges for a priori known groups (e.g. typically developing controls vs. clinical group). Detecting edges that consistently exist for individuals within predefined subgroups aids in interpretation of the heterogeneity in connectivity maps and allows for subgroup-specific inferences. We describe this algorithm, as well as several methods to examine the results. We present an empirical example that finds similarities and differences in resting state functional connectivity among four groups of children: typically developing controls (TDC), children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), children with Inattentive (ADHD-I) and Combined (ADHD-C) Type ADHD. Findings from this study suggest common involvement of the left Broca's area in all the clinical groups, as well as several unique patterns of functional connectivity specific to a given disorder. Overall, the current approach and proof of principle findings highlight a novel and reliable tool for capturing heterogeneity in complex mental health disorders.

AB - Connectivity modeling in functional neuroimaging has become widely used method of analysis for understanding functional architecture. One method for deriving directed connectivity models is Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME; Gates and Molenaar, 2012). GIMME looks for commonalities across the sample to detect signal from noise and arrive at edges that exist across the majority in the group (“group-level edges”) and individual-level edges. In this way, GIMME obtains generalizable results via the group-level edges while also allowing for between subject heterogeneity in connectivity, moving the field closer to obtaining reliable personalized connectivity maps. In this article, we present a novel extension of GIMME, confirmatory subgrouping GIMME, which estimates subgroup-level edges for a priori known groups (e.g. typically developing controls vs. clinical group). Detecting edges that consistently exist for individuals within predefined subgroups aids in interpretation of the heterogeneity in connectivity maps and allows for subgroup-specific inferences. We describe this algorithm, as well as several methods to examine the results. We present an empirical example that finds similarities and differences in resting state functional connectivity among four groups of children: typically developing controls (TDC), children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), children with Inattentive (ADHD-I) and Combined (ADHD-C) Type ADHD. Findings from this study suggest common involvement of the left Broca's area in all the clinical groups, as well as several unique patterns of functional connectivity specific to a given disorder. Overall, the current approach and proof of principle findings highlight a novel and reliable tool for capturing heterogeneity in complex mental health disorders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059428753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059428753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.040

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.040

M3 - Article

VL - 188

SP - 642

EP - 653

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

ER -