Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

218 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several scales exist for measuring functional status in patients with low-back pain (LBP). There are few comparative data, however, to suggest which scales may perform best. We compared the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), its major subscales, and a short index derived from the SIP (a slight modification of an index proposed by Roland) with regard to reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Walk-in patients with mechanical LBP (n=136) completed the entire SIP at an index visit and again 3 weeks later. The examination of individual items allowed scoring for the derivative scales. The modified Roland Scale appeared to have reliability, validity, and sensitivity that were at least as good as the overall SIP or its major subscales. Although the Roland Scale did not measure psychosocial function well, this aspect of functioning changed less over time than physical function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)951-954
Number of pages4
JournalSpine
Volume11
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sickness Impact Profile
Low Back Pain
Reproducibility of Results

Keywords

  • Functional status
  • Low-back pain
  • Measurement scales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain. / Deyo, Richard (Rick).

In: Spine, Vol. 11, No. 9, 1986, p. 951-954.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d2013f0f2c1486eaecc1bd79fc59313,
title = "Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain",
abstract = "Several scales exist for measuring functional status in patients with low-back pain (LBP). There are few comparative data, however, to suggest which scales may perform best. We compared the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), its major subscales, and a short index derived from the SIP (a slight modification of an index proposed by Roland) with regard to reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Walk-in patients with mechanical LBP (n=136) completed the entire SIP at an index visit and again 3 weeks later. The examination of individual items allowed scoring for the derivative scales. The modified Roland Scale appeared to have reliability, validity, and sensitivity that were at least as good as the overall SIP or its major subscales. Although the Roland Scale did not measure psychosocial function well, this aspect of functioning changed less over time than physical function.",
keywords = "Functional status, Low-back pain, Measurement scales",
author = "Deyo, {Richard (Rick)}",
year = "1986",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "951--954",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - Several scales exist for measuring functional status in patients with low-back pain (LBP). There are few comparative data, however, to suggest which scales may perform best. We compared the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), its major subscales, and a short index derived from the SIP (a slight modification of an index proposed by Roland) with regard to reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Walk-in patients with mechanical LBP (n=136) completed the entire SIP at an index visit and again 3 weeks later. The examination of individual items allowed scoring for the derivative scales. The modified Roland Scale appeared to have reliability, validity, and sensitivity that were at least as good as the overall SIP or its major subscales. Although the Roland Scale did not measure psychosocial function well, this aspect of functioning changed less over time than physical function.

AB - Several scales exist for measuring functional status in patients with low-back pain (LBP). There are few comparative data, however, to suggest which scales may perform best. We compared the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), its major subscales, and a short index derived from the SIP (a slight modification of an index proposed by Roland) with regard to reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Walk-in patients with mechanical LBP (n=136) completed the entire SIP at an index visit and again 3 weeks later. The examination of individual items allowed scoring for the derivative scales. The modified Roland Scale appeared to have reliability, validity, and sensitivity that were at least as good as the overall SIP or its major subscales. Although the Roland Scale did not measure psychosocial function well, this aspect of functioning changed less over time than physical function.

KW - Functional status

KW - Low-back pain

KW - Measurement scales

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022903475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022903475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2950601

AN - SCOPUS:0022903475

VL - 11

SP - 951

EP - 954

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 9

ER -