Community health center use after oregon’s randomized medicaid experiment

Jennifer Devoe, Miguel Marino, Rachel Gold, Megan J. Hoopes, Stuart Cowburn, John Heintzman, Charles Gallia, Christine A. Nelson, Nathalie Huguet, Steffani Bailey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE There is debate about whether community health centers (CHCs) will experience increased demand from patients gaining coverage through Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansions. To better understand the effect of new Medicaid coverage on CHC use over time, we studied Oregon’s 2008 randomized Medicaid expansion (the “Oregon Experiment”). METHODS We probabilistically matched demographic data from adults (aged 19-64 years) participating in the Oregon Experiment to electronic health record data from 108 Oregon CHCs within the OCHIN community health information network (originally the Oregon Community Health Information Network) (N = 34,849). We performed intent-to-treat analyses using zero-inflated Poisson regression models to compare 36-month (2008-2011) usage rates among those selected to apply for Medicaid vs not selected, and instrumental variable analyses to estimate the effect of gaining Medicaid coverage on use. Use outcomes included primary care visits, behavioral/mental health visits, laboratory tests, referrals, immunizations, and imaging. RESULTS The intent-to-treat analyses revealed statistically significant differences in rates of behavioral/mental health visits, referrals, and imaging between patients randomly selected to apply for Medicaid vs those not selected. In instrumental variable analyses, gaining Medicaid coverage significantly increased the rate of primary care visits, laboratory tests, referrals, and imaging; rate ratios ranged from 1.27 (95% CI, 1.05-1.55) for laboratory tests to 1.58 (95% CI, 1.10-2.28) for referrals. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that use of many different types of CHC services will increase as patients gain Medicaid through Affordable Care Act expansions. To maximize access to critical health services, it will be important to ensure that the health care system can support increasing demands by providing more resources to CHCs and other primary care settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-320
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Community Health Centers
Medicaid
Referral and Consultation
Community Networks
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Primary Health Care
Information Services
Mental Health
Community Health Services
Electronic Health Records
Health Services
Immunization
Demography
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • ACA
  • Community health centers
  • Health policy
  • Medicaid
  • Oregon Experiment
  • Patient protection and affordable care act
  • Practice-based research
  • Primary care utilization
  • Vulnerable populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Community health center use after oregon’s randomized medicaid experiment. / Devoe, Jennifer; Marino, Miguel; Gold, Rachel; Hoopes, Megan J.; Cowburn, Stuart; Heintzman, John; Gallia, Charles; Nelson, Christine A.; Huguet, Nathalie; Bailey, Steffani.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 312-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Devoe, Jennifer ; Marino, Miguel ; Gold, Rachel ; Hoopes, Megan J. ; Cowburn, Stuart ; Heintzman, John ; Gallia, Charles ; Nelson, Christine A. ; Huguet, Nathalie ; Bailey, Steffani. / Community health center use after oregon’s randomized medicaid experiment. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 312-320.
@article{bd264550c42745b1988dcbe9fae6c1d4,
title = "Community health center use after oregon’s randomized medicaid experiment",
abstract = "PURPOSE There is debate about whether community health centers (CHCs) will experience increased demand from patients gaining coverage through Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansions. To better understand the effect of new Medicaid coverage on CHC use over time, we studied Oregon’s 2008 randomized Medicaid expansion (the “Oregon Experiment”). METHODS We probabilistically matched demographic data from adults (aged 19-64 years) participating in the Oregon Experiment to electronic health record data from 108 Oregon CHCs within the OCHIN community health information network (originally the Oregon Community Health Information Network) (N = 34,849). We performed intent-to-treat analyses using zero-inflated Poisson regression models to compare 36-month (2008-2011) usage rates among those selected to apply for Medicaid vs not selected, and instrumental variable analyses to estimate the effect of gaining Medicaid coverage on use. Use outcomes included primary care visits, behavioral/mental health visits, laboratory tests, referrals, immunizations, and imaging. RESULTS The intent-to-treat analyses revealed statistically significant differences in rates of behavioral/mental health visits, referrals, and imaging between patients randomly selected to apply for Medicaid vs those not selected. In instrumental variable analyses, gaining Medicaid coverage significantly increased the rate of primary care visits, laboratory tests, referrals, and imaging; rate ratios ranged from 1.27 (95{\%} CI, 1.05-1.55) for laboratory tests to 1.58 (95{\%} CI, 1.10-2.28) for referrals. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that use of many different types of CHC services will increase as patients gain Medicaid through Affordable Care Act expansions. To maximize access to critical health services, it will be important to ensure that the health care system can support increasing demands by providing more resources to CHCs and other primary care settings.",
keywords = "ACA, Community health centers, Health policy, Medicaid, Oregon Experiment, Patient protection and affordable care act, Practice-based research, Primary care utilization, Vulnerable populations",
author = "Jennifer Devoe and Miguel Marino and Rachel Gold and Hoopes, {Megan J.} and Stuart Cowburn and John Heintzman and Charles Gallia and Nelson, {Christine A.} and Nathalie Huguet and Steffani Bailey",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1370/afm.1812",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "312--320",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community health center use after oregon’s randomized medicaid experiment

AU - Devoe, Jennifer

AU - Marino, Miguel

AU - Gold, Rachel

AU - Hoopes, Megan J.

AU - Cowburn, Stuart

AU - Heintzman, John

AU - Gallia, Charles

AU - Nelson, Christine A.

AU - Huguet, Nathalie

AU - Bailey, Steffani

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE There is debate about whether community health centers (CHCs) will experience increased demand from patients gaining coverage through Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansions. To better understand the effect of new Medicaid coverage on CHC use over time, we studied Oregon’s 2008 randomized Medicaid expansion (the “Oregon Experiment”). METHODS We probabilistically matched demographic data from adults (aged 19-64 years) participating in the Oregon Experiment to electronic health record data from 108 Oregon CHCs within the OCHIN community health information network (originally the Oregon Community Health Information Network) (N = 34,849). We performed intent-to-treat analyses using zero-inflated Poisson regression models to compare 36-month (2008-2011) usage rates among those selected to apply for Medicaid vs not selected, and instrumental variable analyses to estimate the effect of gaining Medicaid coverage on use. Use outcomes included primary care visits, behavioral/mental health visits, laboratory tests, referrals, immunizations, and imaging. RESULTS The intent-to-treat analyses revealed statistically significant differences in rates of behavioral/mental health visits, referrals, and imaging between patients randomly selected to apply for Medicaid vs those not selected. In instrumental variable analyses, gaining Medicaid coverage significantly increased the rate of primary care visits, laboratory tests, referrals, and imaging; rate ratios ranged from 1.27 (95% CI, 1.05-1.55) for laboratory tests to 1.58 (95% CI, 1.10-2.28) for referrals. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that use of many different types of CHC services will increase as patients gain Medicaid through Affordable Care Act expansions. To maximize access to critical health services, it will be important to ensure that the health care system can support increasing demands by providing more resources to CHCs and other primary care settings.

AB - PURPOSE There is debate about whether community health centers (CHCs) will experience increased demand from patients gaining coverage through Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansions. To better understand the effect of new Medicaid coverage on CHC use over time, we studied Oregon’s 2008 randomized Medicaid expansion (the “Oregon Experiment”). METHODS We probabilistically matched demographic data from adults (aged 19-64 years) participating in the Oregon Experiment to electronic health record data from 108 Oregon CHCs within the OCHIN community health information network (originally the Oregon Community Health Information Network) (N = 34,849). We performed intent-to-treat analyses using zero-inflated Poisson regression models to compare 36-month (2008-2011) usage rates among those selected to apply for Medicaid vs not selected, and instrumental variable analyses to estimate the effect of gaining Medicaid coverage on use. Use outcomes included primary care visits, behavioral/mental health visits, laboratory tests, referrals, immunizations, and imaging. RESULTS The intent-to-treat analyses revealed statistically significant differences in rates of behavioral/mental health visits, referrals, and imaging between patients randomly selected to apply for Medicaid vs those not selected. In instrumental variable analyses, gaining Medicaid coverage significantly increased the rate of primary care visits, laboratory tests, referrals, and imaging; rate ratios ranged from 1.27 (95% CI, 1.05-1.55) for laboratory tests to 1.58 (95% CI, 1.10-2.28) for referrals. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that use of many different types of CHC services will increase as patients gain Medicaid through Affordable Care Act expansions. To maximize access to critical health services, it will be important to ensure that the health care system can support increasing demands by providing more resources to CHCs and other primary care settings.

KW - ACA

KW - Community health centers

KW - Health policy

KW - Medicaid

KW - Oregon Experiment

KW - Patient protection and affordable care act

KW - Practice-based research

KW - Primary care utilization

KW - Vulnerable populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937915707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937915707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.1812

DO - 10.1370/afm.1812

M3 - Article

C2 - 26195674

AN - SCOPUS:84937915707

VL - 13

SP - 312

EP - 320

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 4

ER -