Communicating with providers about racial healthcare disparities

The role of providers’ prior beliefs on their receptivity to different narrative frames

Diana J. Burgess, Barbara G. Bokhour, Brooke A. Cunningham, Tam Do, Johanne Eliacin, Howard S. Gordon, Amy Gravely, Dina M. Jones, Melissa R. Partin, Charlene Pope, Somnath (Som) Saha, Brent C. Taylor, Sarah E. Gollust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate narratives aimed at motivating providers with different pre-existing beliefs to address racial healthcare disparities. Methods: Survey experiment with 280 providers. Providers were classified as high or low in attributing disparities to providers (HPA versus LPA) and were randomly assigned to a non-narrative control or 1 of 2 narratives: “Provider Success” (provider successfully resolved problem involving Black patient) and “Provider Bias” (Black patient experienced racial bias, which remained unresolved). Participants’ reactions to narratives (including identification with narrative) and likelihood of participating in disparities-reduction activities were immediately assessed. Four weeks later, participation in those activities was assessed, including self-reported participation in a disparities-reduction training course (primary outcome). Results: Participation in training was higher among providers randomized to the Provider Success narrative compared to Provider Bias or Control. LPA participants had higher identification with Provider Success than Provider Bias narratives, whereas among HPA participants, differences in identification between the narratives were not significant. Conclusions: Provider Success narratives led to greater participation in training than Provider Bias narratives, although providers’ pre-existing beliefs influenced the narrative they identified with. Practice implications: Provider Success narratives may be more effective at motivating providers to address disparities than Provider Bias narratives, though more research is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Healthcare Disparities
Racism
Research

Keywords

  • Attitude of health personnel
  • Healthcare disparities
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Racism
  • Veterans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Communicating with providers about racial healthcare disparities : The role of providers’ prior beliefs on their receptivity to different narrative frames. / Burgess, Diana J.; Bokhour, Barbara G.; Cunningham, Brooke A.; Do, Tam; Eliacin, Johanne; Gordon, Howard S.; Gravely, Amy; Jones, Dina M.; Partin, Melissa R.; Pope, Charlene; Saha, Somnath (Som); Taylor, Brent C.; Gollust, Sarah E.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burgess, Diana J. ; Bokhour, Barbara G. ; Cunningham, Brooke A. ; Do, Tam ; Eliacin, Johanne ; Gordon, Howard S. ; Gravely, Amy ; Jones, Dina M. ; Partin, Melissa R. ; Pope, Charlene ; Saha, Somnath (Som) ; Taylor, Brent C. ; Gollust, Sarah E. / Communicating with providers about racial healthcare disparities : The role of providers’ prior beliefs on their receptivity to different narrative frames. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2018.
@article{25057998d96041ce90402e0dcb6b82ce,
title = "Communicating with providers about racial healthcare disparities: The role of providers’ prior beliefs on their receptivity to different narrative frames",
abstract = "Objective: Evaluate narratives aimed at motivating providers with different pre-existing beliefs to address racial healthcare disparities. Methods: Survey experiment with 280 providers. Providers were classified as high or low in attributing disparities to providers (HPA versus LPA) and were randomly assigned to a non-narrative control or 1 of 2 narratives: “Provider Success” (provider successfully resolved problem involving Black patient) and “Provider Bias” (Black patient experienced racial bias, which remained unresolved). Participants’ reactions to narratives (including identification with narrative) and likelihood of participating in disparities-reduction activities were immediately assessed. Four weeks later, participation in those activities was assessed, including self-reported participation in a disparities-reduction training course (primary outcome). Results: Participation in training was higher among providers randomized to the Provider Success narrative compared to Provider Bias or Control. LPA participants had higher identification with Provider Success than Provider Bias narratives, whereas among HPA participants, differences in identification between the narratives were not significant. Conclusions: Provider Success narratives led to greater participation in training than Provider Bias narratives, although providers’ pre-existing beliefs influenced the narrative they identified with. Practice implications: Provider Success narratives may be more effective at motivating providers to address disparities than Provider Bias narratives, though more research is needed.",
keywords = "Attitude of health personnel, Healthcare disparities, Physician-patient relations, Racism, Veterans",
author = "Burgess, {Diana J.} and Bokhour, {Barbara G.} and Cunningham, {Brooke A.} and Tam Do and Johanne Eliacin and Gordon, {Howard S.} and Amy Gravely and Jones, {Dina M.} and Partin, {Melissa R.} and Charlene Pope and Saha, {Somnath (Som)} and Taylor, {Brent C.} and Gollust, {Sarah E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.030",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicating with providers about racial healthcare disparities

T2 - The role of providers’ prior beliefs on their receptivity to different narrative frames

AU - Burgess, Diana J.

AU - Bokhour, Barbara G.

AU - Cunningham, Brooke A.

AU - Do, Tam

AU - Eliacin, Johanne

AU - Gordon, Howard S.

AU - Gravely, Amy

AU - Jones, Dina M.

AU - Partin, Melissa R.

AU - Pope, Charlene

AU - Saha, Somnath (Som)

AU - Taylor, Brent C.

AU - Gollust, Sarah E.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: Evaluate narratives aimed at motivating providers with different pre-existing beliefs to address racial healthcare disparities. Methods: Survey experiment with 280 providers. Providers were classified as high or low in attributing disparities to providers (HPA versus LPA) and were randomly assigned to a non-narrative control or 1 of 2 narratives: “Provider Success” (provider successfully resolved problem involving Black patient) and “Provider Bias” (Black patient experienced racial bias, which remained unresolved). Participants’ reactions to narratives (including identification with narrative) and likelihood of participating in disparities-reduction activities were immediately assessed. Four weeks later, participation in those activities was assessed, including self-reported participation in a disparities-reduction training course (primary outcome). Results: Participation in training was higher among providers randomized to the Provider Success narrative compared to Provider Bias or Control. LPA participants had higher identification with Provider Success than Provider Bias narratives, whereas among HPA participants, differences in identification between the narratives were not significant. Conclusions: Provider Success narratives led to greater participation in training than Provider Bias narratives, although providers’ pre-existing beliefs influenced the narrative they identified with. Practice implications: Provider Success narratives may be more effective at motivating providers to address disparities than Provider Bias narratives, though more research is needed.

AB - Objective: Evaluate narratives aimed at motivating providers with different pre-existing beliefs to address racial healthcare disparities. Methods: Survey experiment with 280 providers. Providers were classified as high or low in attributing disparities to providers (HPA versus LPA) and were randomly assigned to a non-narrative control or 1 of 2 narratives: “Provider Success” (provider successfully resolved problem involving Black patient) and “Provider Bias” (Black patient experienced racial bias, which remained unresolved). Participants’ reactions to narratives (including identification with narrative) and likelihood of participating in disparities-reduction activities were immediately assessed. Four weeks later, participation in those activities was assessed, including self-reported participation in a disparities-reduction training course (primary outcome). Results: Participation in training was higher among providers randomized to the Provider Success narrative compared to Provider Bias or Control. LPA participants had higher identification with Provider Success than Provider Bias narratives, whereas among HPA participants, differences in identification between the narratives were not significant. Conclusions: Provider Success narratives led to greater participation in training than Provider Bias narratives, although providers’ pre-existing beliefs influenced the narrative they identified with. Practice implications: Provider Success narratives may be more effective at motivating providers to address disparities than Provider Bias narratives, though more research is needed.

KW - Attitude of health personnel

KW - Healthcare disparities

KW - Physician-patient relations

KW - Racism

KW - Veterans

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053865862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053865862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.030

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.030

M3 - Article

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

ER -