Communicating acute coronary syndrome risk to women in primary care

A scoping review of the literature

Elizabeth Knight, Maribeth Slebodnik, C. Pinder, Holli A. DeVon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objectives: Delay from symptom onset to hospital arrival drives poor outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly for women. Primary care clinicians can discuss ACS with high-risk women, potentially reducing delay. We conducted a scoping review to assess what is known about ACS risk communication to women in primary care. Methods: We used Arksey and O'Malley's framework. The PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were searched for relevant articles from inception through September, 2018. No restrictions on study methodology were applied. At least two reviewers assessed each article. Articles addressing risk communication, coronary heart disease, and ACS, related to primary care settings, and including women were retained. Results: Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk communication is common in primary care; however, ACS symptoms are rarely discussed. Structured risk calculators are used to frame discussions. Communication styles include patient-centered discussions, paternalistic orders, and “scare tactics;” no single style is more effective. Analysis of gender differences in risk communication is extremely limited. Conclusion: There is scant evidence that primary care clinicians communicate effectively about ACS risk, symptoms, and appropriate symptom response. Practice implications: Interventions are needed to improve communication about ACS to at-risk women in the primary care setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Acute Coronary Syndrome
Primary Health Care
Communication
PubMed
Coronary Disease
Cardiovascular Diseases
Databases

Keywords

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Primary care
  • Risk communication
  • Scoping review
  • Women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Communicating acute coronary syndrome risk to women in primary care : A scoping review of the literature. / Knight, Elizabeth; Slebodnik, Maribeth; Pinder, C.; DeVon, Holli A.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{7cfe08f8183b43238ef58b4e8f5d10c4,
title = "Communicating acute coronary syndrome risk to women in primary care: A scoping review of the literature",
abstract = "Objectives: Delay from symptom onset to hospital arrival drives poor outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly for women. Primary care clinicians can discuss ACS with high-risk women, potentially reducing delay. We conducted a scoping review to assess what is known about ACS risk communication to women in primary care. Methods: We used Arksey and O'Malley's framework. The PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were searched for relevant articles from inception through September, 2018. No restrictions on study methodology were applied. At least two reviewers assessed each article. Articles addressing risk communication, coronary heart disease, and ACS, related to primary care settings, and including women were retained. Results: Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk communication is common in primary care; however, ACS symptoms are rarely discussed. Structured risk calculators are used to frame discussions. Communication styles include patient-centered discussions, paternalistic orders, and “scare tactics;” no single style is more effective. Analysis of gender differences in risk communication is extremely limited. Conclusion: There is scant evidence that primary care clinicians communicate effectively about ACS risk, symptoms, and appropriate symptom response. Practice implications: Interventions are needed to improve communication about ACS to at-risk women in the primary care setting.",
keywords = "Acute coronary syndrome, Primary care, Risk communication, Scoping review, Women",
author = "Elizabeth Knight and Maribeth Slebodnik and C. Pinder and DeVon, {Holli A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.013",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicating acute coronary syndrome risk to women in primary care

T2 - A scoping review of the literature

AU - Knight, Elizabeth

AU - Slebodnik, Maribeth

AU - Pinder, C.

AU - DeVon, Holli A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives: Delay from symptom onset to hospital arrival drives poor outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly for women. Primary care clinicians can discuss ACS with high-risk women, potentially reducing delay. We conducted a scoping review to assess what is known about ACS risk communication to women in primary care. Methods: We used Arksey and O'Malley's framework. The PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were searched for relevant articles from inception through September, 2018. No restrictions on study methodology were applied. At least two reviewers assessed each article. Articles addressing risk communication, coronary heart disease, and ACS, related to primary care settings, and including women were retained. Results: Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk communication is common in primary care; however, ACS symptoms are rarely discussed. Structured risk calculators are used to frame discussions. Communication styles include patient-centered discussions, paternalistic orders, and “scare tactics;” no single style is more effective. Analysis of gender differences in risk communication is extremely limited. Conclusion: There is scant evidence that primary care clinicians communicate effectively about ACS risk, symptoms, and appropriate symptom response. Practice implications: Interventions are needed to improve communication about ACS to at-risk women in the primary care setting.

AB - Objectives: Delay from symptom onset to hospital arrival drives poor outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly for women. Primary care clinicians can discuss ACS with high-risk women, potentially reducing delay. We conducted a scoping review to assess what is known about ACS risk communication to women in primary care. Methods: We used Arksey and O'Malley's framework. The PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were searched for relevant articles from inception through September, 2018. No restrictions on study methodology were applied. At least two reviewers assessed each article. Articles addressing risk communication, coronary heart disease, and ACS, related to primary care settings, and including women were retained. Results: Eleven articles met inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk communication is common in primary care; however, ACS symptoms are rarely discussed. Structured risk calculators are used to frame discussions. Communication styles include patient-centered discussions, paternalistic orders, and “scare tactics;” no single style is more effective. Analysis of gender differences in risk communication is extremely limited. Conclusion: There is scant evidence that primary care clinicians communicate effectively about ACS risk, symptoms, and appropriate symptom response. Practice implications: Interventions are needed to improve communication about ACS to at-risk women in the primary care setting.

KW - Acute coronary syndrome

KW - Primary care

KW - Risk communication

KW - Scoping review

KW - Women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069037464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069037464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.013

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.013

M3 - Review article

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

ER -