Collective efficacy: Development and validation of a measurement scale for use in public health and development programmes

Maryann G. Delea, Gloria D. Sclar, Mulat Woreta, Regine Haardörfer, Corey Nagel, Bethany A. Caruso, Robert Dreibelbis, Abebe G. Gobezayehu, Thomas F. Clasen, Matthew C. Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes relying on collective action. One possible explanation may be low collective efficacy (CE)—perceptions regarding a group’s ability to execute actions related to a common goal. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a metric to assess factors related to CE. We conducted this research within a cluster-randomised sanitation and hygiene trial in Amhara, Ethiopia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine underlying structures of CE for men and women in rural Ethiopia. We produced three CE scales: one each for men and women that allow for examinations of gender-specific mechanisms through which CE operates, and one 26-item CE scale that can be used across genders. All scales demonstrated high construct validity. CE factor scores were significantly higher for men than women, even among household-level male-female dyads. These CE scales will allow implementers to better design and target community-level interventions, and examine the role of CE in the effectiveness of community-based programming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2139
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 28 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ethiopia
Sanitation
Public Health
Hygiene
Aptitude
Statistical Factor Analysis
Water
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Behaviour change
  • Behavioural control
  • Collective action
  • Collective efficacy
  • Community-based interventions
  • Cooperative behaviour
  • Factor analysis
  • Gender
  • Wash

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Collective efficacy : Development and validation of a measurement scale for use in public health and development programmes. / Delea, Maryann G.; Sclar, Gloria D.; Woreta, Mulat; Haardörfer, Regine; Nagel, Corey; Caruso, Bethany A.; Dreibelbis, Robert; Gobezayehu, Abebe G.; Clasen, Thomas F.; Freeman, Matthew C.

In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2139, 28.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Delea, MG, Sclar, GD, Woreta, M, Haardörfer, R, Nagel, C, Caruso, BA, Dreibelbis, R, Gobezayehu, AG, Clasen, TF & Freeman, MC 2018, 'Collective efficacy: Development and validation of a measurement scale for use in public health and development programmes', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 15, no. 10, 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102139
Delea, Maryann G. ; Sclar, Gloria D. ; Woreta, Mulat ; Haardörfer, Regine ; Nagel, Corey ; Caruso, Bethany A. ; Dreibelbis, Robert ; Gobezayehu, Abebe G. ; Clasen, Thomas F. ; Freeman, Matthew C. / Collective efficacy : Development and validation of a measurement scale for use in public health and development programmes. In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. 10.
@article{5f298df0ab99484e8659b297a22fd3e7,
title = "Collective efficacy: Development and validation of a measurement scale for use in public health and development programmes",
abstract = "Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes relying on collective action. One possible explanation may be low collective efficacy (CE)—perceptions regarding a group’s ability to execute actions related to a common goal. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a metric to assess factors related to CE. We conducted this research within a cluster-randomised sanitation and hygiene trial in Amhara, Ethiopia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine underlying structures of CE for men and women in rural Ethiopia. We produced three CE scales: one each for men and women that allow for examinations of gender-specific mechanisms through which CE operates, and one 26-item CE scale that can be used across genders. All scales demonstrated high construct validity. CE factor scores were significantly higher for men than women, even among household-level male-female dyads. These CE scales will allow implementers to better design and target community-level interventions, and examine the role of CE in the effectiveness of community-based programming.",
keywords = "Behaviour change, Behavioural control, Collective action, Collective efficacy, Community-based interventions, Cooperative behaviour, Factor analysis, Gender, Wash",
author = "Delea, {Maryann G.} and Sclar, {Gloria D.} and Mulat Woreta and Regine Haard{\"o}rfer and Corey Nagel and Caruso, {Bethany A.} and Robert Dreibelbis and Gobezayehu, {Abebe G.} and Clasen, {Thomas F.} and Freeman, {Matthew C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "28",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph15102139",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collective efficacy

T2 - Development and validation of a measurement scale for use in public health and development programmes

AU - Delea, Maryann G.

AU - Sclar, Gloria D.

AU - Woreta, Mulat

AU - Haardörfer, Regine

AU - Nagel, Corey

AU - Caruso, Bethany A.

AU - Dreibelbis, Robert

AU - Gobezayehu, Abebe G.

AU - Clasen, Thomas F.

AU - Freeman, Matthew C.

PY - 2018/9/28

Y1 - 2018/9/28

N2 - Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes relying on collective action. One possible explanation may be low collective efficacy (CE)—perceptions regarding a group’s ability to execute actions related to a common goal. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a metric to assess factors related to CE. We conducted this research within a cluster-randomised sanitation and hygiene trial in Amhara, Ethiopia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine underlying structures of CE for men and women in rural Ethiopia. We produced three CE scales: one each for men and women that allow for examinations of gender-specific mechanisms through which CE operates, and one 26-item CE scale that can be used across genders. All scales demonstrated high construct validity. CE factor scores were significantly higher for men than women, even among household-level male-female dyads. These CE scales will allow implementers to better design and target community-level interventions, and examine the role of CE in the effectiveness of community-based programming.

AB - Impact evaluations of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions have demonstrated lower than expected health gains, in some cases due to low uptake and sustained adoption of interventions at a community level. These findings represent common challenges for public health and development programmes relying on collective action. One possible explanation may be low collective efficacy (CE)—perceptions regarding a group’s ability to execute actions related to a common goal. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a metric to assess factors related to CE. We conducted this research within a cluster-randomised sanitation and hygiene trial in Amhara, Ethiopia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine underlying structures of CE for men and women in rural Ethiopia. We produced three CE scales: one each for men and women that allow for examinations of gender-specific mechanisms through which CE operates, and one 26-item CE scale that can be used across genders. All scales demonstrated high construct validity. CE factor scores were significantly higher for men than women, even among household-level male-female dyads. These CE scales will allow implementers to better design and target community-level interventions, and examine the role of CE in the effectiveness of community-based programming.

KW - Behaviour change

KW - Behavioural control

KW - Collective action

KW - Collective efficacy

KW - Community-based interventions

KW - Cooperative behaviour

KW - Factor analysis

KW - Gender

KW - Wash

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054052627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054052627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph15102139

DO - 10.3390/ijerph15102139

M3 - Article

C2 - 30274212

AN - SCOPUS:85054052627

VL - 15

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 10

M1 - 2139

ER -