TY - JOUR
T1 - Cognitive control and attentional selection in adolescents with ADHD versus ADD
AU - Carr, Laurie
AU - Henderson, John
AU - Nigg, Joel T.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH R01 MH-59105 and MH-MH63146.
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - An important research question is whether Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is related to early- or late-stage attentional control mechanisms and whether this differentiates a nonhyperactive subtype (ADD). This question was addressed in a sample of 145 ADD/ADHD and typically developing comparison adolescents (aged 13-17). Attentional blink and antisaccade tasks were used to assay early- and late-stage control, respectively. ADD was defined using normative cutoffs to ensure low activity level in children who otherwise met full criteria for ADHD. The ADD group had an attenuated attentional blink versus controls and ADHD-combined. The effect was not produced using DSM-IV definition of ADHD-primarily inattentive type or DSM symptom counts. ADHD-combined showed greater weakness in response inhibition, as manifest in the antisaccade task. Combining tasks yielded an interaction differentiating group performance on the two tasks.
AB - An important research question is whether Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is related to early- or late-stage attentional control mechanisms and whether this differentiates a nonhyperactive subtype (ADD). This question was addressed in a sample of 145 ADD/ADHD and typically developing comparison adolescents (aged 13-17). Attentional blink and antisaccade tasks were used to assay early- and late-stage control, respectively. ADD was defined using normative cutoffs to ensure low activity level in children who otherwise met full criteria for ADHD. The ADD group had an attenuated attentional blink versus controls and ADHD-combined. The effect was not produced using DSM-IV definition of ADHD-primarily inattentive type or DSM symptom counts. ADHD-combined showed greater weakness in response inhibition, as manifest in the antisaccade task. Combining tasks yielded an interaction differentiating group performance on the two tasks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149377308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149377308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15374416.2010.517168
DO - 10.1080/15374416.2010.517168
M3 - Article
C2 - 21058121
AN - SCOPUS:78149377308
SN - 1537-4416
VL - 39
SP - 726
EP - 740
JO - Journal of clinical child psychology
JF - Journal of clinical child psychology
IS - 6
ER -