Codon usage bias and base composition in MHC genes in humans and common chimpanzees

Shannon K. McWeeney, Ana Maria Valdes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Codon bias and base composition in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) sequences have been studied for both class I and II loci in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes. There is low to moderate codon bias for the MHC of humans and chimpanzees. In the class I loci, the same level of moderate codon bias is seen for HLA-B, HLA-C, Patr-A. Patr-B, and Patr-C, while at HLA-A the level of codon bias is lower. There is a correlation between codon usage bias and G + C content in the A and B loci in humans and chimps, but not at the C locus. To examine the effect of diversifying selection on codon bias, we subdivided class I alleles into antigen recognition site (ARS) and non-ARS codons. ARS codons had lower bias than non-ARS codons. This may indicate that the constraint of codon bias on nucleotide substitution may be selected against in ARS codons. At the class II loci, there are distinct differences between alpha and beta chain genes with respect to codon usage, with the beta chain genes being much more biased. Species-specific differences in base composition were seen in exon 2 at the DRB1 locus, with lower GC content in chimpanzees. Considering the complex evolutionary history of MHC genes, the study of codon usage patterns provides us with a better understanding of both the evolutionary history of these genes and the evolution of synonymous codon usage in genes under natural selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)272-279
Number of pages8
JournalImmunogenetics
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 18 1999

Keywords

  • Codon usage bias
  • Effective number of codons
  • GC content
  • MHC
  • Scaled chi-square

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Genetics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Codon usage bias and base composition in MHC genes in humans and common chimpanzees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this