Clinician's use of automated reports of estimated glomerular filtration rate: A qualitative study

David H. Smith, Jennifer Schneider, Micah L. Thorp, Suma Vupputuri, Jessica Weiss, Eric S. Johnson, Adrianne Feldstein, Amanda F. Petrik, Xuihai Yang, Susan R. Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a growing awareness in primary care of the importance of identifying patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) so that they can receive appropriate clinical care; one method that has been widely embraced is the use of automated reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by clinical laboratories. We undertook a qualitative study to examine how clinicians use eGFR in clinical decision making, patient communication issues, barriers to use of eGFR, and suggestions to improve the clinical usefulness of eGFR reports. Methods. Our study used qualitative methods with structured interviews among primary care clinicians including both physicians and allied health providers, recruited from Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a non-profit health maintenance organization. Results: We found that clinicians generally held favorable views toward eGFR reporting but did not use eGFR to replace serum creatinine in their clinical decision-making. Clinicians used eGFR as a tool to help identify CKD, educate patients about their kidney function and make treatment decisions. Barriers noted by several clinicians included a desire for greater education regarding care for patients with CKD and tools to facilitate discussion of eGFR findings with patients. Conclusions: The manner in which clinicians use eGFRs appears to be more complex than previously understood, and our study illustrates some of the efforts that might be usefully undertaken (e.g. specific clinician education) when encouraging further promulgation of eGFR reporting and usage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number154
JournalBMC Nephrology
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Glomerular Filtration Rate
Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Primary Health Care
Communication Barriers
Education
Health Maintenance Organizations
Creatinine
Patient Care
Interviews
Physicians
Kidney
Health
Serum

Keywords

  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate
  • Qualitative
  • Serum creatinine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Smith, D. H., Schneider, J., Thorp, M. L., Vupputuri, S., Weiss, J., Johnson, E. S., ... Snyder, S. R. (2012). Clinician's use of automated reports of estimated glomerular filtration rate: A qualitative study. BMC Nephrology, 13(1), [154]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-154

Clinician's use of automated reports of estimated glomerular filtration rate : A qualitative study. / Smith, David H.; Schneider, Jennifer; Thorp, Micah L.; Vupputuri, Suma; Weiss, Jessica; Johnson, Eric S.; Feldstein, Adrianne; Petrik, Amanda F.; Yang, Xuihai; Snyder, Susan R.

In: BMC Nephrology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 154, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, DH, Schneider, J, Thorp, ML, Vupputuri, S, Weiss, J, Johnson, ES, Feldstein, A, Petrik, AF, Yang, X & Snyder, SR 2012, 'Clinician's use of automated reports of estimated glomerular filtration rate: A qualitative study', BMC Nephrology, vol. 13, no. 1, 154. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-154
Smith, David H. ; Schneider, Jennifer ; Thorp, Micah L. ; Vupputuri, Suma ; Weiss, Jessica ; Johnson, Eric S. ; Feldstein, Adrianne ; Petrik, Amanda F. ; Yang, Xuihai ; Snyder, Susan R. / Clinician's use of automated reports of estimated glomerular filtration rate : A qualitative study. In: BMC Nephrology. 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. 1.
@article{a8e807edecad4a3e9f1ee248e0cb311f,
title = "Clinician's use of automated reports of estimated glomerular filtration rate: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: There is a growing awareness in primary care of the importance of identifying patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) so that they can receive appropriate clinical care; one method that has been widely embraced is the use of automated reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by clinical laboratories. We undertook a qualitative study to examine how clinicians use eGFR in clinical decision making, patient communication issues, barriers to use of eGFR, and suggestions to improve the clinical usefulness of eGFR reports. Methods. Our study used qualitative methods with structured interviews among primary care clinicians including both physicians and allied health providers, recruited from Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a non-profit health maintenance organization. Results: We found that clinicians generally held favorable views toward eGFR reporting but did not use eGFR to replace serum creatinine in their clinical decision-making. Clinicians used eGFR as a tool to help identify CKD, educate patients about their kidney function and make treatment decisions. Barriers noted by several clinicians included a desire for greater education regarding care for patients with CKD and tools to facilitate discussion of eGFR findings with patients. Conclusions: The manner in which clinicians use eGFRs appears to be more complex than previously understood, and our study illustrates some of the efforts that might be usefully undertaken (e.g. specific clinician education) when encouraging further promulgation of eGFR reporting and usage.",
keywords = "Estimated glomerular filtration rate, Qualitative, Serum creatinine",
author = "Smith, {David H.} and Jennifer Schneider and Thorp, {Micah L.} and Suma Vupputuri and Jessica Weiss and Johnson, {Eric S.} and Adrianne Feldstein and Petrik, {Amanda F.} and Xuihai Yang and Snyder, {Susan R.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2369-13-154",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Nephrology",
issn = "1471-2369",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinician's use of automated reports of estimated glomerular filtration rate

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Smith, David H.

AU - Schneider, Jennifer

AU - Thorp, Micah L.

AU - Vupputuri, Suma

AU - Weiss, Jessica

AU - Johnson, Eric S.

AU - Feldstein, Adrianne

AU - Petrik, Amanda F.

AU - Yang, Xuihai

AU - Snyder, Susan R.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: There is a growing awareness in primary care of the importance of identifying patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) so that they can receive appropriate clinical care; one method that has been widely embraced is the use of automated reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by clinical laboratories. We undertook a qualitative study to examine how clinicians use eGFR in clinical decision making, patient communication issues, barriers to use of eGFR, and suggestions to improve the clinical usefulness of eGFR reports. Methods. Our study used qualitative methods with structured interviews among primary care clinicians including both physicians and allied health providers, recruited from Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a non-profit health maintenance organization. Results: We found that clinicians generally held favorable views toward eGFR reporting but did not use eGFR to replace serum creatinine in their clinical decision-making. Clinicians used eGFR as a tool to help identify CKD, educate patients about their kidney function and make treatment decisions. Barriers noted by several clinicians included a desire for greater education regarding care for patients with CKD and tools to facilitate discussion of eGFR findings with patients. Conclusions: The manner in which clinicians use eGFRs appears to be more complex than previously understood, and our study illustrates some of the efforts that might be usefully undertaken (e.g. specific clinician education) when encouraging further promulgation of eGFR reporting and usage.

AB - Background: There is a growing awareness in primary care of the importance of identifying patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) so that they can receive appropriate clinical care; one method that has been widely embraced is the use of automated reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by clinical laboratories. We undertook a qualitative study to examine how clinicians use eGFR in clinical decision making, patient communication issues, barriers to use of eGFR, and suggestions to improve the clinical usefulness of eGFR reports. Methods. Our study used qualitative methods with structured interviews among primary care clinicians including both physicians and allied health providers, recruited from Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a non-profit health maintenance organization. Results: We found that clinicians generally held favorable views toward eGFR reporting but did not use eGFR to replace serum creatinine in their clinical decision-making. Clinicians used eGFR as a tool to help identify CKD, educate patients about their kidney function and make treatment decisions. Barriers noted by several clinicians included a desire for greater education regarding care for patients with CKD and tools to facilitate discussion of eGFR findings with patients. Conclusions: The manner in which clinicians use eGFRs appears to be more complex than previously understood, and our study illustrates some of the efforts that might be usefully undertaken (e.g. specific clinician education) when encouraging further promulgation of eGFR reporting and usage.

KW - Estimated glomerular filtration rate

KW - Qualitative

KW - Serum creatinine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869882620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869882620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2369-13-154

DO - 10.1186/1471-2369-13-154

M3 - Article

C2 - 23173944

AN - SCOPUS:84869882620

VL - 13

JO - BMC Nephrology

JF - BMC Nephrology

SN - 1471-2369

IS - 1

M1 - 154

ER -