Clinician Staffing, Scheduling, and Engagement Strategies Among Primary Care Practices Delivering Integrated Care

Melinda Davis, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Maribel Cifuentes, Jennifer Hall, Rose Gunn, Douglas Fernald, Emma Gilchrist, Benjamin F. Miller, Frank DeGruy, Deborah Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the interrelationship among behavioral health clinician (BHC) staffing, scheduling, and a primary care practice's approach to delivering integrated care.

METHODS: Observational cross-case comparative analysis of 17 primary care practices in the United States focused on implementation of integrated care. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and integrated care experience. A multidisciplinary team analyzed documents, practice surveys, field notes from observation visits, implementation diaries, and semistructured interviews using a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS: Across the 17 practices, staffing ratios ranged from 1 BHC covering 0.3 to 36.5 primary care clinicians (PCCs). BHC scheduling varied from 50-minute prescheduled appointments to open, flexible schedules slotted in 15-minute increments. However, staffing and scheduling patterns generally clustered in 2 ways and enabled BHCs to be engaged by referral or warm handoff. Five practices predominantly used warm handoffs to engage BHCs and had higher BHC-to-PCC staffing ratios; multiple BHCs on staff; and shorter, more flexible BHC appointment schedules. Staffing and scheduling structures that enabled warm handoffs supported BHC engagement with patients concurrent with the identification of behavioral health needs. Twelve practices primarily used referrals to engage BHCs and had lower BHC-to-PCC staffing ratios and BHC schedules prefilled with visits. This enabled some BHCs to bill for services, but also made them less accessible to PCCs in when patients presented with behavioral health needs during a clinical encounter. Three of these practices were experimenting with open scheduling and briefer BHC visits to enable real-time access while managing resources.

CONCLUSION: Practices' approaches to PCC-BHC staffing, scheduling, and delivery of integrated care mutually influenced each other and were shaped by the local context. Practice leaders, educators, clinicians, funders, researchers, and policy makers must consider these factors as they seek to optimize integrated systems of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S32-S40
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Volume28
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
Primary Health Care
Health
Appointments and Schedules
Referral and Consultation
Patient Participation
Geographic Locations
Ownership

Keywords

  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Integrated
  • Mental Health
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Clinician Staffing, Scheduling, and Engagement Strategies Among Primary Care Practices Delivering Integrated Care. / Davis, Melinda; Balasubramanian, Bijal A.; Cifuentes, Maribel; Hall, Jennifer; Gunn, Rose; Fernald, Douglas; Gilchrist, Emma; Miller, Benjamin F.; DeGruy, Frank; Cohen, Deborah.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, Vol. 28, 01.09.2015, p. S32-S40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, Melinda ; Balasubramanian, Bijal A. ; Cifuentes, Maribel ; Hall, Jennifer ; Gunn, Rose ; Fernald, Douglas ; Gilchrist, Emma ; Miller, Benjamin F. ; DeGruy, Frank ; Cohen, Deborah. / Clinician Staffing, Scheduling, and Engagement Strategies Among Primary Care Practices Delivering Integrated Care. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. 2015 ; Vol. 28. pp. S32-S40.
@article{1a5534520b2841a4a7e8a7f7895f1da0,
title = "Clinician Staffing, Scheduling, and Engagement Strategies Among Primary Care Practices Delivering Integrated Care",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To examine the interrelationship among behavioral health clinician (BHC) staffing, scheduling, and a primary care practice's approach to delivering integrated care.METHODS: Observational cross-case comparative analysis of 17 primary care practices in the United States focused on implementation of integrated care. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and integrated care experience. A multidisciplinary team analyzed documents, practice surveys, field notes from observation visits, implementation diaries, and semistructured interviews using a grounded theory approach.RESULTS: Across the 17 practices, staffing ratios ranged from 1 BHC covering 0.3 to 36.5 primary care clinicians (PCCs). BHC scheduling varied from 50-minute prescheduled appointments to open, flexible schedules slotted in 15-minute increments. However, staffing and scheduling patterns generally clustered in 2 ways and enabled BHCs to be engaged by referral or warm handoff. Five practices predominantly used warm handoffs to engage BHCs and had higher BHC-to-PCC staffing ratios; multiple BHCs on staff; and shorter, more flexible BHC appointment schedules. Staffing and scheduling structures that enabled warm handoffs supported BHC engagement with patients concurrent with the identification of behavioral health needs. Twelve practices primarily used referrals to engage BHCs and had lower BHC-to-PCC staffing ratios and BHC schedules prefilled with visits. This enabled some BHCs to bill for services, but also made them less accessible to PCCs in when patients presented with behavioral health needs during a clinical encounter. Three of these practices were experimenting with open scheduling and briefer BHC visits to enable real-time access while managing resources.CONCLUSION: Practices' approaches to PCC-BHC staffing, scheduling, and delivery of integrated care mutually influenced each other and were shaped by the local context. Practice leaders, educators, clinicians, funders, researchers, and policy makers must consider these factors as they seek to optimize integrated systems of care.",
keywords = "Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Mental Health, Primary Health Care, Qualitative Research",
author = "Melinda Davis and Balasubramanian, {Bijal A.} and Maribel Cifuentes and Jennifer Hall and Rose Gunn and Douglas Fernald and Emma Gilchrist and Miller, {Benjamin F.} and Frank DeGruy and Deborah Cohen",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150087",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "S32--S40",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinician Staffing, Scheduling, and Engagement Strategies Among Primary Care Practices Delivering Integrated Care

AU - Davis, Melinda

AU - Balasubramanian, Bijal A.

AU - Cifuentes, Maribel

AU - Hall, Jennifer

AU - Gunn, Rose

AU - Fernald, Douglas

AU - Gilchrist, Emma

AU - Miller, Benjamin F.

AU - DeGruy, Frank

AU - Cohen, Deborah

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To examine the interrelationship among behavioral health clinician (BHC) staffing, scheduling, and a primary care practice's approach to delivering integrated care.METHODS: Observational cross-case comparative analysis of 17 primary care practices in the United States focused on implementation of integrated care. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and integrated care experience. A multidisciplinary team analyzed documents, practice surveys, field notes from observation visits, implementation diaries, and semistructured interviews using a grounded theory approach.RESULTS: Across the 17 practices, staffing ratios ranged from 1 BHC covering 0.3 to 36.5 primary care clinicians (PCCs). BHC scheduling varied from 50-minute prescheduled appointments to open, flexible schedules slotted in 15-minute increments. However, staffing and scheduling patterns generally clustered in 2 ways and enabled BHCs to be engaged by referral or warm handoff. Five practices predominantly used warm handoffs to engage BHCs and had higher BHC-to-PCC staffing ratios; multiple BHCs on staff; and shorter, more flexible BHC appointment schedules. Staffing and scheduling structures that enabled warm handoffs supported BHC engagement with patients concurrent with the identification of behavioral health needs. Twelve practices primarily used referrals to engage BHCs and had lower BHC-to-PCC staffing ratios and BHC schedules prefilled with visits. This enabled some BHCs to bill for services, but also made them less accessible to PCCs in when patients presented with behavioral health needs during a clinical encounter. Three of these practices were experimenting with open scheduling and briefer BHC visits to enable real-time access while managing resources.CONCLUSION: Practices' approaches to PCC-BHC staffing, scheduling, and delivery of integrated care mutually influenced each other and were shaped by the local context. Practice leaders, educators, clinicians, funders, researchers, and policy makers must consider these factors as they seek to optimize integrated systems of care.

AB - PURPOSE: To examine the interrelationship among behavioral health clinician (BHC) staffing, scheduling, and a primary care practice's approach to delivering integrated care.METHODS: Observational cross-case comparative analysis of 17 primary care practices in the United States focused on implementation of integrated care. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and integrated care experience. A multidisciplinary team analyzed documents, practice surveys, field notes from observation visits, implementation diaries, and semistructured interviews using a grounded theory approach.RESULTS: Across the 17 practices, staffing ratios ranged from 1 BHC covering 0.3 to 36.5 primary care clinicians (PCCs). BHC scheduling varied from 50-minute prescheduled appointments to open, flexible schedules slotted in 15-minute increments. However, staffing and scheduling patterns generally clustered in 2 ways and enabled BHCs to be engaged by referral or warm handoff. Five practices predominantly used warm handoffs to engage BHCs and had higher BHC-to-PCC staffing ratios; multiple BHCs on staff; and shorter, more flexible BHC appointment schedules. Staffing and scheduling structures that enabled warm handoffs supported BHC engagement with patients concurrent with the identification of behavioral health needs. Twelve practices primarily used referrals to engage BHCs and had lower BHC-to-PCC staffing ratios and BHC schedules prefilled with visits. This enabled some BHCs to bill for services, but also made them less accessible to PCCs in when patients presented with behavioral health needs during a clinical encounter. Three of these practices were experimenting with open scheduling and briefer BHC visits to enable real-time access while managing resources.CONCLUSION: Practices' approaches to PCC-BHC staffing, scheduling, and delivery of integrated care mutually influenced each other and were shaped by the local context. Practice leaders, educators, clinicians, funders, researchers, and policy makers must consider these factors as they seek to optimize integrated systems of care.

KW - Delivery of Health Care

KW - Integrated

KW - Mental Health

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Qualitative Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016703047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016703047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150087

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150087

M3 - Article

C2 - 26359470

AN - SCOPUS:85016703047

VL - 28

SP - S32-S40

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

ER -