Clinical Protocol to Promote Standardization of Basic Tinnitus Services by Audiologists

James Henry, Candice Manning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Clinical services for tinnitus are needed by millions of people annually. These services have not been standardized, and patients are vulnerable to receiving services that may appear legitimate but are not based on research evidence. The purpose of this clinical focus article is to promote standardization of tinnitus services by proposing an efficient clinical protocol for audiologists. Method The suggested clinical protocol is based primarily on research conducted at the National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research for the past 2 decades, with the focus on 2 randomized controlled trials completed recently that showed efficacy of an audiologic protocol involving hearing aids and brief tinnitus counseling. The protocol is mostly consistent with clinical practice guidelines that have been published. Results The two National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research randomized controlled trials revealed significant reduction of tinnitus functional effects for both hearing aids and "combination instruments" (hearing aids with a built-in sound generator), although there were no significant differences between devices. Existing clinical practice guidelines for tinnitus are summarized with respect to their common recommendations for assessment and intervention. Conclusions A defined clinical protocol is suggested for audiologists, which includes a case history, appropriate referral, audiologic assessment, use of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey ( Henry, Griest, et al., 2015 ), brief tinnitus counseling, hearing aids or combination instruments as warranted, follow-up assessment, and criteria for determining if further tinnitus-specific services are needed. Use of this protocol can help to promote standardization of tinnitus practice by audiologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-161
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican journal of audiology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 22 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tinnitus
Clinical Protocols
Hearing Aids
Practice Guidelines
Research
Counseling
Randomized Controlled Trials
Audiologists
Hearing
Referral and Consultation
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Clinical Protocol to Promote Standardization of Basic Tinnitus Services by Audiologists. / Henry, James; Manning, Candice.

In: American journal of audiology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 22.04.2019, p. 152-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c2bdba7b02ec44f8920c3f5e05de032d,
title = "Clinical Protocol to Promote Standardization of Basic Tinnitus Services by Audiologists",
abstract = "Purpose Clinical services for tinnitus are needed by millions of people annually. These services have not been standardized, and patients are vulnerable to receiving services that may appear legitimate but are not based on research evidence. The purpose of this clinical focus article is to promote standardization of tinnitus services by proposing an efficient clinical protocol for audiologists. Method The suggested clinical protocol is based primarily on research conducted at the National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research for the past 2 decades, with the focus on 2 randomized controlled trials completed recently that showed efficacy of an audiologic protocol involving hearing aids and brief tinnitus counseling. The protocol is mostly consistent with clinical practice guidelines that have been published. Results The two National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research randomized controlled trials revealed significant reduction of tinnitus functional effects for both hearing aids and {"}combination instruments{"} (hearing aids with a built-in sound generator), although there were no significant differences between devices. Existing clinical practice guidelines for tinnitus are summarized with respect to their common recommendations for assessment and intervention. Conclusions A defined clinical protocol is suggested for audiologists, which includes a case history, appropriate referral, audiologic assessment, use of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey ( Henry, Griest, et al., 2015 ), brief tinnitus counseling, hearing aids or combination instruments as warranted, follow-up assessment, and criteria for determining if further tinnitus-specific services are needed. Use of this protocol can help to promote standardization of tinnitus practice by audiologists.",
author = "James Henry and Candice Manning",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1044/2018_AJA-TTR17-18-0038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "152--161",
journal = "American Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1059-0889",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical Protocol to Promote Standardization of Basic Tinnitus Services by Audiologists

AU - Henry, James

AU - Manning, Candice

PY - 2019/4/22

Y1 - 2019/4/22

N2 - Purpose Clinical services for tinnitus are needed by millions of people annually. These services have not been standardized, and patients are vulnerable to receiving services that may appear legitimate but are not based on research evidence. The purpose of this clinical focus article is to promote standardization of tinnitus services by proposing an efficient clinical protocol for audiologists. Method The suggested clinical protocol is based primarily on research conducted at the National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research for the past 2 decades, with the focus on 2 randomized controlled trials completed recently that showed efficacy of an audiologic protocol involving hearing aids and brief tinnitus counseling. The protocol is mostly consistent with clinical practice guidelines that have been published. Results The two National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research randomized controlled trials revealed significant reduction of tinnitus functional effects for both hearing aids and "combination instruments" (hearing aids with a built-in sound generator), although there were no significant differences between devices. Existing clinical practice guidelines for tinnitus are summarized with respect to their common recommendations for assessment and intervention. Conclusions A defined clinical protocol is suggested for audiologists, which includes a case history, appropriate referral, audiologic assessment, use of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey ( Henry, Griest, et al., 2015 ), brief tinnitus counseling, hearing aids or combination instruments as warranted, follow-up assessment, and criteria for determining if further tinnitus-specific services are needed. Use of this protocol can help to promote standardization of tinnitus practice by audiologists.

AB - Purpose Clinical services for tinnitus are needed by millions of people annually. These services have not been standardized, and patients are vulnerable to receiving services that may appear legitimate but are not based on research evidence. The purpose of this clinical focus article is to promote standardization of tinnitus services by proposing an efficient clinical protocol for audiologists. Method The suggested clinical protocol is based primarily on research conducted at the National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research for the past 2 decades, with the focus on 2 randomized controlled trials completed recently that showed efficacy of an audiologic protocol involving hearing aids and brief tinnitus counseling. The protocol is mostly consistent with clinical practice guidelines that have been published. Results The two National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research randomized controlled trials revealed significant reduction of tinnitus functional effects for both hearing aids and "combination instruments" (hearing aids with a built-in sound generator), although there were no significant differences between devices. Existing clinical practice guidelines for tinnitus are summarized with respect to their common recommendations for assessment and intervention. Conclusions A defined clinical protocol is suggested for audiologists, which includes a case history, appropriate referral, audiologic assessment, use of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey ( Henry, Griest, et al., 2015 ), brief tinnitus counseling, hearing aids or combination instruments as warranted, follow-up assessment, and criteria for determining if further tinnitus-specific services are needed. Use of this protocol can help to promote standardization of tinnitus practice by audiologists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065441896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065441896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2018_AJA-TTR17-18-0038

DO - 10.1044/2018_AJA-TTR17-18-0038

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 152

EP - 161

JO - American Journal of Audiology

JF - American Journal of Audiology

SN - 1059-0889

IS - 1

ER -