Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review.

W. R. Hersh, M. Helfand, J. Wallace, D. Kraemer, P. Patterson, S. Shapiro, M. Greenlick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The use of telemedicine is growing, but its efficacy for achieving comparable or improved clinical outcomes has not been established in many medical specialties. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of telemedicine interventions for health outcomes in two classes of application: home-based and office/hospital-based. Data sources for the study included deports of studies from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and HealthSTAR databases; searching of bibliographies of review and other articles; and consultation of printed resources as well as investigators in the field. We included studies that were relevant to at least one of the two classes of telemedicine and addressed the assessment of efficacy for clinical outcomes with data of reported results. We excluded studies where the service did not historically require face-to-face encounters (e.g., radiology or pathology diagnosis). All included articles were abstracted and graded for quality and direction of the evidence. A total of 25 articles met inclusion criteria and were assessed. The strongest evidence for the efficacy of telemedicine in clinical outcomes comes from home-based telemedicine in the areas of chronic disease management, hypertension, and AIDS. The value of home glucose monitoring in diabetes mellitus is conflicting. There is also reasonable evidence that telemedicine is comparable to face-to-face care in emergency medicine and is beneficial in surgical and neonatal intensive care units as well as patient transfer in neurosurgery. Despite the widespread use of telemedicine in virtually all major areas of health care, evidence concerning the benefits of its use exists in only a small number of them. Further randomized controlled trials must be done to determine where its use is most effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5
Number of pages1
JournalBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Volume1
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Telemedicine
Patient Transfer
Emergency Medicine
Information Storage and Retrieval
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Neurosurgery
Bibliography
Critical Care
Disease Management
Radiology
MEDLINE
Diabetes Mellitus
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Chronic Disease
Referral and Consultation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research Personnel
Medicine
Databases
Pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions : a systematic review. / Hersh, W. R.; Helfand, M.; Wallace, J.; Kraemer, D.; Patterson, P.; Shapiro, S.; Greenlick, M.

In: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 1, 2001, p. 5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hersh, W. R. ; Helfand, M. ; Wallace, J. ; Kraemer, D. ; Patterson, P. ; Shapiro, S. ; Greenlick, M. / Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions : a systematic review. In: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2001 ; Vol. 1. pp. 5.
@article{cef8f7cc301247aab180708d090fab00,
title = "Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review.",
abstract = "The use of telemedicine is growing, but its efficacy for achieving comparable or improved clinical outcomes has not been established in many medical specialties. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of telemedicine interventions for health outcomes in two classes of application: home-based and office/hospital-based. Data sources for the study included deports of studies from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and HealthSTAR databases; searching of bibliographies of review and other articles; and consultation of printed resources as well as investigators in the field. We included studies that were relevant to at least one of the two classes of telemedicine and addressed the assessment of efficacy for clinical outcomes with data of reported results. We excluded studies where the service did not historically require face-to-face encounters (e.g., radiology or pathology diagnosis). All included articles were abstracted and graded for quality and direction of the evidence. A total of 25 articles met inclusion criteria and were assessed. The strongest evidence for the efficacy of telemedicine in clinical outcomes comes from home-based telemedicine in the areas of chronic disease management, hypertension, and AIDS. The value of home glucose monitoring in diabetes mellitus is conflicting. There is also reasonable evidence that telemedicine is comparable to face-to-face care in emergency medicine and is beneficial in surgical and neonatal intensive care units as well as patient transfer in neurosurgery. Despite the widespread use of telemedicine in virtually all major areas of health care, evidence concerning the benefits of its use exists in only a small number of them. Further randomized controlled trials must be done to determine where its use is most effective.",
author = "Hersh, {W. R.} and M. Helfand and J. Wallace and D. Kraemer and P. Patterson and S. Shapiro and M. Greenlick",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "5",
journal = "BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making",
issn = "1472-6947",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions

T2 - a systematic review.

AU - Hersh, W. R.

AU - Helfand, M.

AU - Wallace, J.

AU - Kraemer, D.

AU - Patterson, P.

AU - Shapiro, S.

AU - Greenlick, M.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The use of telemedicine is growing, but its efficacy for achieving comparable or improved clinical outcomes has not been established in many medical specialties. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of telemedicine interventions for health outcomes in two classes of application: home-based and office/hospital-based. Data sources for the study included deports of studies from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and HealthSTAR databases; searching of bibliographies of review and other articles; and consultation of printed resources as well as investigators in the field. We included studies that were relevant to at least one of the two classes of telemedicine and addressed the assessment of efficacy for clinical outcomes with data of reported results. We excluded studies where the service did not historically require face-to-face encounters (e.g., radiology or pathology diagnosis). All included articles were abstracted and graded for quality and direction of the evidence. A total of 25 articles met inclusion criteria and were assessed. The strongest evidence for the efficacy of telemedicine in clinical outcomes comes from home-based telemedicine in the areas of chronic disease management, hypertension, and AIDS. The value of home glucose monitoring in diabetes mellitus is conflicting. There is also reasonable evidence that telemedicine is comparable to face-to-face care in emergency medicine and is beneficial in surgical and neonatal intensive care units as well as patient transfer in neurosurgery. Despite the widespread use of telemedicine in virtually all major areas of health care, evidence concerning the benefits of its use exists in only a small number of them. Further randomized controlled trials must be done to determine where its use is most effective.

AB - The use of telemedicine is growing, but its efficacy for achieving comparable or improved clinical outcomes has not been established in many medical specialties. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of telemedicine interventions for health outcomes in two classes of application: home-based and office/hospital-based. Data sources for the study included deports of studies from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and HealthSTAR databases; searching of bibliographies of review and other articles; and consultation of printed resources as well as investigators in the field. We included studies that were relevant to at least one of the two classes of telemedicine and addressed the assessment of efficacy for clinical outcomes with data of reported results. We excluded studies where the service did not historically require face-to-face encounters (e.g., radiology or pathology diagnosis). All included articles were abstracted and graded for quality and direction of the evidence. A total of 25 articles met inclusion criteria and were assessed. The strongest evidence for the efficacy of telemedicine in clinical outcomes comes from home-based telemedicine in the areas of chronic disease management, hypertension, and AIDS. The value of home glucose monitoring in diabetes mellitus is conflicting. There is also reasonable evidence that telemedicine is comparable to face-to-face care in emergency medicine and is beneficial in surgical and neonatal intensive care units as well as patient transfer in neurosurgery. Despite the widespread use of telemedicine in virtually all major areas of health care, evidence concerning the benefits of its use exists in only a small number of them. Further randomized controlled trials must be done to determine where its use is most effective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883788840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883788840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11737882

VL - 1

SP - 5

JO - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

JF - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

SN - 1472-6947

ER -