Clinical implementation of RNA sequencing for Mendelian disease diagnostics

Vicente A. Yépez, Mirjana Gusic, Robert Kopajtich, Christian Mertes, Nicholas H. Smith, Charlotte L. Alston, Rui Ban, Skadi Beblo, Riccardo Berutti, Holger Blessing, Elżbieta Ciara, Felix Distelmaier, Peter Freisinger, Johannes Häberle, Susan J. Hayflick, Maja Hempel, Yulia S. Itkis, Yoshihito Kishita, Thomas Klopstock, Tatiana D. KrylovaCostanza Lamperti, Dominic Lenz, Christine Makowski, Signe Mosegaard, Michaela F. Müller, Gerard Muñoz-Pujol, Agnieszka Nadel, Akira Ohtake, Yasushi Okazaki, Elena Procopio, Thomas Schwarzmayr, Joél Smet, Christian Staufner, Sarah L. Stenton, Tim M. Strom, Caterina Terrile, Frederic Tort, Rudy Van Coster, Arnaud Vanlander, Matias Wagner, Manting Xu, Fang Fang, Daniele Ghezzi, Johannes A. Mayr, Dorota Piekutowska-Abramczuk, Antonia Ribes, Agnès Rötig, Robert W. Taylor, Saskia B. Wortmann, Kei Murayama, Thomas Meitinger, Julien Gagneur, Holger Prokisch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Lack of functional evidence hampers variant interpretation, leaving a large proportion of individuals with a suspected Mendelian disorder without genetic diagnosis after whole genome or whole exome sequencing (WES). Research studies advocate to further sequence transcriptomes to directly and systematically probe gene expression defects. However, collection of additional biopsies and establishment of lab workflows, analytical pipelines, and defined concepts in clinical interpretation of aberrant gene expression are still needed for adopting RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in routine diagnostics. Methods: We implemented an automated RNA-seq protocol and a computational workflow with which we analyzed skin fibroblasts of 303 individuals with a suspected mitochondrial disease that previously underwent WES. We also assessed through simulations how aberrant expression and mono-allelic expression tests depend on RNA-seq coverage. Results: We detected on average 12,500 genes per sample including around 60% of all disease genes—a coverage substantially higher than with whole blood, supporting the use of skin biopsies. We prioritized genes demonstrating aberrant expression, aberrant splicing, or mono-allelic expression. The pipeline required less than 1 week from sample preparation to result reporting and provided a median of eight disease-associated genes per patient for inspection. A genetic diagnosis was established for 16% of the 205 WES-inconclusive cases. Detection of aberrant expression was a major contributor to diagnosis including instances of 50% reduction, which, together with mono-allelic expression, allowed for the diagnosis of dominant disorders caused by haploinsufficiency. Moreover, calling aberrant splicing and variants from RNA-seq data enabled detecting and validating splice-disrupting variants, of which the majority fell outside WES-covered regions. Conclusion: Together, these results show that streamlined experimental and computational processes can accelerate the implementation of RNA-seq in routine diagnostics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number38
JournalGenome Medicine
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Genetic diagnostics
  • Mendelian diseases
  • RNA-seq

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical implementation of RNA sequencing for Mendelian disease diagnostics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this