Clinical Documentation in Electronic Health Record Systems: Analysis of Patient Record Review During Outpatient Ophthalmology Visits

Michelle Hribar, David Biermann, Isaac H. Goldstein, Michael Chiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Busy clinicians struggle with productivity and usability in electronic health record systems (EHRs). While previous studies have investigated documentation practices and strategies in the inpatient setting, outpatient documentation and review practices by clinicians using EHRs are relatively unknown. In this study, we look at clinicians' patterns of note review in the EHR during outpatient follow-up office visits in ophthalmology. Key findings from this study are that the number and percentage of notes reviewed is very low, there is variation between providers, specialties, and users, and staff access more notes than physicians. These findings suggest that the vast majority of content in the EHR is not being used by clinicians; improved EHR designs would better present this data and support the information needs of outpatient clinicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)584-591
Number of pages8
JournalAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Volume2018
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Ophthalmology
Systems Analysis
Documentation
Outpatients
Office Visits
Inpatients
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{5209970a4ea442f684f4bfb732bc4681,
title = "Clinical Documentation in Electronic Health Record Systems: Analysis of Patient Record Review During Outpatient Ophthalmology Visits",
abstract = "Busy clinicians struggle with productivity and usability in electronic health record systems (EHRs). While previous studies have investigated documentation practices and strategies in the inpatient setting, outpatient documentation and review practices by clinicians using EHRs are relatively unknown. In this study, we look at clinicians' patterns of note review in the EHR during outpatient follow-up office visits in ophthalmology. Key findings from this study are that the number and percentage of notes reviewed is very low, there is variation between providers, specialties, and users, and staff access more notes than physicians. These findings suggest that the vast majority of content in the EHR is not being used by clinicians; improved EHR designs would better present this data and support the information needs of outpatient clinicians.",
author = "Michelle Hribar and David Biermann and Goldstein, {Isaac H.} and Michael Chiang",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2018",
pages = "584--591",
journal = "AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium",
issn = "1559-4076",
publisher = "American Medical Informatics Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical Documentation in Electronic Health Record Systems

T2 - Analysis of Patient Record Review During Outpatient Ophthalmology Visits

AU - Hribar, Michelle

AU - Biermann, David

AU - Goldstein, Isaac H.

AU - Chiang, Michael

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Busy clinicians struggle with productivity and usability in electronic health record systems (EHRs). While previous studies have investigated documentation practices and strategies in the inpatient setting, outpatient documentation and review practices by clinicians using EHRs are relatively unknown. In this study, we look at clinicians' patterns of note review in the EHR during outpatient follow-up office visits in ophthalmology. Key findings from this study are that the number and percentage of notes reviewed is very low, there is variation between providers, specialties, and users, and staff access more notes than physicians. These findings suggest that the vast majority of content in the EHR is not being used by clinicians; improved EHR designs would better present this data and support the information needs of outpatient clinicians.

AB - Busy clinicians struggle with productivity and usability in electronic health record systems (EHRs). While previous studies have investigated documentation practices and strategies in the inpatient setting, outpatient documentation and review practices by clinicians using EHRs are relatively unknown. In this study, we look at clinicians' patterns of note review in the EHR during outpatient follow-up office visits in ophthalmology. Key findings from this study are that the number and percentage of notes reviewed is very low, there is variation between providers, specialties, and users, and staff access more notes than physicians. These findings suggest that the vast majority of content in the EHR is not being used by clinicians; improved EHR designs would better present this data and support the information needs of outpatient clinicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062376706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062376706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 30815099

AN - SCOPUS:85062376706

VL - 2018

SP - 584

EP - 591

JO - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

JF - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

SN - 1559-4076

ER -