Circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability associated with coronary artery disease

James McClelland, Blair Halperin, Joel Cutler, Peter Kudenchuk, Jack Kron, John McAnulty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although sudden cardiac deaths and ischemic cardiac events clearly occur in a circadian pattern, such a pattern has not been shown for primary arrhythmic events. Because primary arrhythmic events are thought to play an Important role in sudden cardiac death, a large series of ventricular stimulation studies was analyzed to determine whether circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability exists. If such a circadian variation could be shown, it could have implications for the conduct and interpretation of electrophysiologic testing and the etiology of circadian variation in sudden cardiac death. Results of 2 drug-free ventricular stimulation studies performed 4 to 28 hours apart in each of 162 patients with coronary artery disease were analyzed. Rate and duration of Induced arrhythmia, number of extrastimui required to Induce arrhythmia and changes in these factors between the 2 tests in each patient were analyzed. Comparisons were made by half-day, by hour and in a temporally continuous manner to eliminate errors associated with any single method. No significant circadian variation was found in any electrophysiologic measure of ventricular electrical instability despite adequate statistical power. These findings show that the time of day during which ventricular stimulation tests are performed does not affect test results, and therefore does not need to be controlled during electrophysiologic studies. If these findings are parallel to those in ambulatory patients with coronary artery disease, then circadian changes in ventricular electrical instability may not play as important a role in the circadian pattern of sudden cardiac death as had been previously thought.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1351-1357
Number of pages7
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume65
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1990

Fingerprint

Sudden Cardiac Death
Coronary Artery Disease
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability associated with coronary artery disease. / McClelland, James; Halperin, Blair; Cutler, Joel; Kudenchuk, Peter; Kron, Jack; McAnulty, John.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 65, No. 20, 01.06.1990, p. 1351-1357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McClelland, J, Halperin, B, Cutler, J, Kudenchuk, P, Kron, J & McAnulty, J 1990, 'Circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability associated with coronary artery disease', The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 65, no. 20, pp. 1351-1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(90)91326-2
McClelland, James ; Halperin, Blair ; Cutler, Joel ; Kudenchuk, Peter ; Kron, Jack ; McAnulty, John. / Circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability associated with coronary artery disease. In: The American Journal of Cardiology. 1990 ; Vol. 65, No. 20. pp. 1351-1357.
@article{1161f83e3e8542648da3a4733168d65a,
title = "Circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability associated with coronary artery disease",
abstract = "Although sudden cardiac deaths and ischemic cardiac events clearly occur in a circadian pattern, such a pattern has not been shown for primary arrhythmic events. Because primary arrhythmic events are thought to play an Important role in sudden cardiac death, a large series of ventricular stimulation studies was analyzed to determine whether circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability exists. If such a circadian variation could be shown, it could have implications for the conduct and interpretation of electrophysiologic testing and the etiology of circadian variation in sudden cardiac death. Results of 2 drug-free ventricular stimulation studies performed 4 to 28 hours apart in each of 162 patients with coronary artery disease were analyzed. Rate and duration of Induced arrhythmia, number of extrastimui required to Induce arrhythmia and changes in these factors between the 2 tests in each patient were analyzed. Comparisons were made by half-day, by hour and in a temporally continuous manner to eliminate errors associated with any single method. No significant circadian variation was found in any electrophysiologic measure of ventricular electrical instability despite adequate statistical power. These findings show that the time of day during which ventricular stimulation tests are performed does not affect test results, and therefore does not need to be controlled during electrophysiologic studies. If these findings are parallel to those in ambulatory patients with coronary artery disease, then circadian changes in ventricular electrical instability may not play as important a role in the circadian pattern of sudden cardiac death as had been previously thought.",
author = "James McClelland and Blair Halperin and Joel Cutler and Peter Kudenchuk and Jack Kron and John McAnulty",
year = "1990",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9149(90)91326-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "1351--1357",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability associated with coronary artery disease

AU - McClelland, James

AU - Halperin, Blair

AU - Cutler, Joel

AU - Kudenchuk, Peter

AU - Kron, Jack

AU - McAnulty, John

PY - 1990/6/1

Y1 - 1990/6/1

N2 - Although sudden cardiac deaths and ischemic cardiac events clearly occur in a circadian pattern, such a pattern has not been shown for primary arrhythmic events. Because primary arrhythmic events are thought to play an Important role in sudden cardiac death, a large series of ventricular stimulation studies was analyzed to determine whether circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability exists. If such a circadian variation could be shown, it could have implications for the conduct and interpretation of electrophysiologic testing and the etiology of circadian variation in sudden cardiac death. Results of 2 drug-free ventricular stimulation studies performed 4 to 28 hours apart in each of 162 patients with coronary artery disease were analyzed. Rate and duration of Induced arrhythmia, number of extrastimui required to Induce arrhythmia and changes in these factors between the 2 tests in each patient were analyzed. Comparisons were made by half-day, by hour and in a temporally continuous manner to eliminate errors associated with any single method. No significant circadian variation was found in any electrophysiologic measure of ventricular electrical instability despite adequate statistical power. These findings show that the time of day during which ventricular stimulation tests are performed does not affect test results, and therefore does not need to be controlled during electrophysiologic studies. If these findings are parallel to those in ambulatory patients with coronary artery disease, then circadian changes in ventricular electrical instability may not play as important a role in the circadian pattern of sudden cardiac death as had been previously thought.

AB - Although sudden cardiac deaths and ischemic cardiac events clearly occur in a circadian pattern, such a pattern has not been shown for primary arrhythmic events. Because primary arrhythmic events are thought to play an Important role in sudden cardiac death, a large series of ventricular stimulation studies was analyzed to determine whether circadian variation in ventricular electrical instability exists. If such a circadian variation could be shown, it could have implications for the conduct and interpretation of electrophysiologic testing and the etiology of circadian variation in sudden cardiac death. Results of 2 drug-free ventricular stimulation studies performed 4 to 28 hours apart in each of 162 patients with coronary artery disease were analyzed. Rate and duration of Induced arrhythmia, number of extrastimui required to Induce arrhythmia and changes in these factors between the 2 tests in each patient were analyzed. Comparisons were made by half-day, by hour and in a temporally continuous manner to eliminate errors associated with any single method. No significant circadian variation was found in any electrophysiologic measure of ventricular electrical instability despite adequate statistical power. These findings show that the time of day during which ventricular stimulation tests are performed does not affect test results, and therefore does not need to be controlled during electrophysiologic studies. If these findings are parallel to those in ambulatory patients with coronary artery disease, then circadian changes in ventricular electrical instability may not play as important a role in the circadian pattern of sudden cardiac death as had been previously thought.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025296840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025296840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91326-2

DO - 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91326-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 2343823

AN - SCOPUS:0025296840

VL - 65

SP - 1351

EP - 1357

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 20

ER -