Chronic reduction in inhibition reduces receptive field size in mouse auditory cortex

Bryan A. Seybold, Amelia Stanco, Kathleen K.A. Cho, Gregory B. Potter, Carol Kim, Vikaas S. Sohal, John L.R. Rubenstein, Christoph E. Schreiner

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Scopus citations


    Inhibitory interneurons regulate the responses of cortical circuits. In auditory cortical areas, inhibition from these neurons narrows spectral tuning and shapes response dynamics. Acute disruptions of inhibition expand spectral receptive fields. However, the effects of long-term perturbations of inhibitory circuitry on auditory cortical responses are unknown. We ablated ?30% of dendrite-targeting cortical inhibitory interneurons after the critical period by studying mice with a conditional deletion of Dlx1. Following the loss of interneurons, baseline firing rates rose and tone-evoked responses became less sparse in auditory cortex. However, contrary to acute blockades of inhibition, the sizes of spectral receptive fields were reduced, demonstrating both higher thresholds and narrower bandwidths. Furthermore, long-latency responses at the edge of the receptive field were absent. On the basis of changes in response dynamics, the mechanism for the reduction in receptive field size appears to be a compensatory loss of corticocortically (CC) driven responses. Our findings suggest chronic conditions that feature changes in inhibitory circuitry are not likely to be well modeled by acute network manipulations, and compensation may be a critical component of chronic neuronal conditions.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)13829-13834
    Number of pages6
    JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    Issue number34
    StatePublished - Aug 21 2012

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General


    Dive into the research topics of 'Chronic reduction in inhibition reduces receptive field size in mouse auditory cortex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this