Chiropractic use by urban and rural residents with insurance coverage

Bonnie Lind, Paula K. Diehr, David E. Grembowski, William E. Lafferty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the use of chiropractic care by urban and rural residents in Washington state with musculoskeletal diagnoses, all of whom have insurance coverage for this care. The analyses investigate whether restricting the analyses to insured individuals attenuates previously reported differences in the prevalence of chiropractic use between urban and rural residents as well as whether differences in provider availability or patient cost-sharing explain the difference in utilization. Methods: Claims data from 237,500 claimants in 2 large insurance companies in Washington state for calendar year 2002 were analyzed, using adjusted clinical group risk adjustment for differences in disease burden and rural urban commuting area codes for rurality definition. Findings: The proportion of claimants using chiropractors was higher in rural than urban residents (44% vs 32%, P <.001). Lack of conventional providers in rural areas did not completely explain this difference, nor did differences in patient cost-sharing or demographics. Among those who used chiropractors, those in urban areas had more chiropractic visits than users of chiropractic in rural areas. Conclusions: Among insured adults, use of chiropractic care was higher in rural than in urban areas. Reasons suggested for this difference in previous reports were not borne out in this data set.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-258
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rural Health
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chiropractic
Insurance Coverage
Cost Sharing
Risk Adjustment
Insurance
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Chiropractic use by urban and rural residents with insurance coverage. / Lind, Bonnie; Diehr, Paula K.; Grembowski, David E.; Lafferty, William E.

In: Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.06.2009, p. 253-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lind, Bonnie ; Diehr, Paula K. ; Grembowski, David E. ; Lafferty, William E. / Chiropractic use by urban and rural residents with insurance coverage. In: Journal of Rural Health. 2009 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 253-258.
@article{6a5d470f5f3d4375abb5b9892e27f747,
title = "Chiropractic use by urban and rural residents with insurance coverage",
abstract = "Purpose: To describe the use of chiropractic care by urban and rural residents in Washington state with musculoskeletal diagnoses, all of whom have insurance coverage for this care. The analyses investigate whether restricting the analyses to insured individuals attenuates previously reported differences in the prevalence of chiropractic use between urban and rural residents as well as whether differences in provider availability or patient cost-sharing explain the difference in utilization. Methods: Claims data from 237,500 claimants in 2 large insurance companies in Washington state for calendar year 2002 were analyzed, using adjusted clinical group risk adjustment for differences in disease burden and rural urban commuting area codes for rurality definition. Findings: The proportion of claimants using chiropractors was higher in rural than urban residents (44{\%} vs 32{\%}, P <.001). Lack of conventional providers in rural areas did not completely explain this difference, nor did differences in patient cost-sharing or demographics. Among those who used chiropractors, those in urban areas had more chiropractic visits than users of chiropractic in rural areas. Conclusions: Among insured adults, use of chiropractic care was higher in rural than in urban areas. Reasons suggested for this difference in previous reports were not borne out in this data set.",
author = "Bonnie Lind and Diehr, {Paula K.} and Grembowski, {David E.} and Lafferty, {William E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00227.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "253--258",
journal = "Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "0890-765X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chiropractic use by urban and rural residents with insurance coverage

AU - Lind, Bonnie

AU - Diehr, Paula K.

AU - Grembowski, David E.

AU - Lafferty, William E.

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - Purpose: To describe the use of chiropractic care by urban and rural residents in Washington state with musculoskeletal diagnoses, all of whom have insurance coverage for this care. The analyses investigate whether restricting the analyses to insured individuals attenuates previously reported differences in the prevalence of chiropractic use between urban and rural residents as well as whether differences in provider availability or patient cost-sharing explain the difference in utilization. Methods: Claims data from 237,500 claimants in 2 large insurance companies in Washington state for calendar year 2002 were analyzed, using adjusted clinical group risk adjustment for differences in disease burden and rural urban commuting area codes for rurality definition. Findings: The proportion of claimants using chiropractors was higher in rural than urban residents (44% vs 32%, P <.001). Lack of conventional providers in rural areas did not completely explain this difference, nor did differences in patient cost-sharing or demographics. Among those who used chiropractors, those in urban areas had more chiropractic visits than users of chiropractic in rural areas. Conclusions: Among insured adults, use of chiropractic care was higher in rural than in urban areas. Reasons suggested for this difference in previous reports were not borne out in this data set.

AB - Purpose: To describe the use of chiropractic care by urban and rural residents in Washington state with musculoskeletal diagnoses, all of whom have insurance coverage for this care. The analyses investigate whether restricting the analyses to insured individuals attenuates previously reported differences in the prevalence of chiropractic use between urban and rural residents as well as whether differences in provider availability or patient cost-sharing explain the difference in utilization. Methods: Claims data from 237,500 claimants in 2 large insurance companies in Washington state for calendar year 2002 were analyzed, using adjusted clinical group risk adjustment for differences in disease burden and rural urban commuting area codes for rurality definition. Findings: The proportion of claimants using chiropractors was higher in rural than urban residents (44% vs 32%, P <.001). Lack of conventional providers in rural areas did not completely explain this difference, nor did differences in patient cost-sharing or demographics. Among those who used chiropractors, those in urban areas had more chiropractic visits than users of chiropractic in rural areas. Conclusions: Among insured adults, use of chiropractic care was higher in rural than in urban areas. Reasons suggested for this difference in previous reports were not borne out in this data set.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67949083607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67949083607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00227.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00227.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19566610

AN - SCOPUS:67949083607

VL - 25

SP - 253

EP - 258

JO - Journal of Rural Health

JF - Journal of Rural Health

SN - 0890-765X

IS - 3

ER -