Chemically dependent doctors.

G. T. Chiodo, Susan Tolle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Overcoming denial and admitting to having a chemical dependency problem is a hurdle that is extraordinarily difficult for anyone to handle without professional assistance. Addicted health care professionals often become even more deeply enmeshed in denial of their problem. They refuse help because they see themselves as educated beyond the level of those who are attempting to help them, and because they fear professional humiliation. Dental professionals who become aware of a colleague's chemical dependence, have an ethical duty to intervene in a constructive way. Reporting to a dental society wellness committee will accomplish this goal while protecting patients, the profession, the addicted provider, and the provider's family. Nonetheless, assisting chemically dependent colleagues to seek treatment can be an enormous burden. Thus, the dental hygienist in the case presented has few choices. She clearly has sufficient evidence of the dentist's chemical dependency problem and, ethically, she must act to prevent harm to patients. If a wellness program is available, it will help her. However, she should not expect gratitude from the dentist at the time of her intervention. Addicted persons rarely thank those who try to help them until much later and whistle-blowers are rarely appreciated. As is often the case, doing the right thing may be a challenge that risks losing a relationship or, as in the case presented, a job.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGeneral Dentistry
Volume45
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 1997

Fingerprint

Dentists
Whistleblowing
Dental Societies
Dental Hygienists
Patient Harm
Health Promotion
Fear
Tooth
Delivery of Health Care
Denial (Psychology)
Dependency (Psychology)
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Chemically dependent doctors. / Chiodo, G. T.; Tolle, Susan.

In: General Dentistry, Vol. 45, No. 6, 11.1997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chiodo, GT & Tolle, S 1997, 'Chemically dependent doctors.', General Dentistry, vol. 45, no. 6.
Chiodo, G. T. ; Tolle, Susan. / Chemically dependent doctors. In: General Dentistry. 1997 ; Vol. 45, No. 6.
@article{f628e79656614e4da764ccb61f328ed5,
title = "Chemically dependent doctors.",
abstract = "Overcoming denial and admitting to having a chemical dependency problem is a hurdle that is extraordinarily difficult for anyone to handle without professional assistance. Addicted health care professionals often become even more deeply enmeshed in denial of their problem. They refuse help because they see themselves as educated beyond the level of those who are attempting to help them, and because they fear professional humiliation. Dental professionals who become aware of a colleague's chemical dependence, have an ethical duty to intervene in a constructive way. Reporting to a dental society wellness committee will accomplish this goal while protecting patients, the profession, the addicted provider, and the provider's family. Nonetheless, assisting chemically dependent colleagues to seek treatment can be an enormous burden. Thus, the dental hygienist in the case presented has few choices. She clearly has sufficient evidence of the dentist's chemical dependency problem and, ethically, she must act to prevent harm to patients. If a wellness program is available, it will help her. However, she should not expect gratitude from the dentist at the time of her intervention. Addicted persons rarely thank those who try to help them until much later and whistle-blowers are rarely appreciated. As is often the case, doing the right thing may be a challenge that risks losing a relationship or, as in the case presented, a job.",
author = "Chiodo, {G. T.} and Susan Tolle",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
journal = "General Dentistry",
issn = "0363-6771",
publisher = "Academy of General Dentistry",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chemically dependent doctors.

AU - Chiodo, G. T.

AU - Tolle, Susan

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - Overcoming denial and admitting to having a chemical dependency problem is a hurdle that is extraordinarily difficult for anyone to handle without professional assistance. Addicted health care professionals often become even more deeply enmeshed in denial of their problem. They refuse help because they see themselves as educated beyond the level of those who are attempting to help them, and because they fear professional humiliation. Dental professionals who become aware of a colleague's chemical dependence, have an ethical duty to intervene in a constructive way. Reporting to a dental society wellness committee will accomplish this goal while protecting patients, the profession, the addicted provider, and the provider's family. Nonetheless, assisting chemically dependent colleagues to seek treatment can be an enormous burden. Thus, the dental hygienist in the case presented has few choices. She clearly has sufficient evidence of the dentist's chemical dependency problem and, ethically, she must act to prevent harm to patients. If a wellness program is available, it will help her. However, she should not expect gratitude from the dentist at the time of her intervention. Addicted persons rarely thank those who try to help them until much later and whistle-blowers are rarely appreciated. As is often the case, doing the right thing may be a challenge that risks losing a relationship or, as in the case presented, a job.

AB - Overcoming denial and admitting to having a chemical dependency problem is a hurdle that is extraordinarily difficult for anyone to handle without professional assistance. Addicted health care professionals often become even more deeply enmeshed in denial of their problem. They refuse help because they see themselves as educated beyond the level of those who are attempting to help them, and because they fear professional humiliation. Dental professionals who become aware of a colleague's chemical dependence, have an ethical duty to intervene in a constructive way. Reporting to a dental society wellness committee will accomplish this goal while protecting patients, the profession, the addicted provider, and the provider's family. Nonetheless, assisting chemically dependent colleagues to seek treatment can be an enormous burden. Thus, the dental hygienist in the case presented has few choices. She clearly has sufficient evidence of the dentist's chemical dependency problem and, ethically, she must act to prevent harm to patients. If a wellness program is available, it will help her. However, she should not expect gratitude from the dentist at the time of her intervention. Addicted persons rarely thank those who try to help them until much later and whistle-blowers are rarely appreciated. As is often the case, doing the right thing may be a challenge that risks losing a relationship or, as in the case presented, a job.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031267474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031267474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9663081

AN - SCOPUS:0031267474

VL - 45

JO - General Dentistry

JF - General Dentistry

SN - 0363-6771

IS - 6

ER -