TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics of oncology clinical trials
T2 - Insights from a systematic analysis of clinicaltrials.gov
AU - Hirsch, Bradford R.
AU - Califf, Robert M.
AU - Cheng, Steven K.
AU - Tasneem, Asba
AU - Horton, John
AU - Chiswell, Karen
AU - Schulman, Kevin A.
AU - Dilts, David M.
AU - Abernethy, Amy P.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/6/10
Y1 - 2013/6/10
N2 - Importance: Clinical trials are essential to cancer care, and data about the current state of research in oncology are needed to develop benchmarks and set the stage for improvement. Objective: To perform a comprehensive analysis of the national oncology clinical research portfolio. Design: All interventional clinical studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between October 2007 and September 2010 were identified using Medical Subject Heading terms and submitted conditions. They were reviewed to validate classification, subcategorized by cancer type, and stratified by design characteristics to facilitate comparison across cancer types and with other specialties. Results: Of 40 970 interventional studies registered between October 2007 and September 2010, a total of 8942 (21.8%) focused on oncology. Compared with other specialties, oncology trials were more likely to be single arm (62.3% vs 23.8%; P < .001), open label (87.8% vs 47.3%; P < .001), and nonrandomized (63.9% vs 22.7%; P < .001). There was moderate but significant correlation between number of trials conducted by cancer type and associated incidence and mortality (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, 0.56 [P =.04] and 0.77 [P =.001], respectively). More than one-third of all oncology trials were conducted solely outside North America. Conclusions and Relevance : There are significant variations between clinical trials in oncology and other diseases, as well as among trials within oncology. The differences must be better understood to improve both the impact of cancer research on clinical practice and the use of constrained resources.
AB - Importance: Clinical trials are essential to cancer care, and data about the current state of research in oncology are needed to develop benchmarks and set the stage for improvement. Objective: To perform a comprehensive analysis of the national oncology clinical research portfolio. Design: All interventional clinical studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between October 2007 and September 2010 were identified using Medical Subject Heading terms and submitted conditions. They were reviewed to validate classification, subcategorized by cancer type, and stratified by design characteristics to facilitate comparison across cancer types and with other specialties. Results: Of 40 970 interventional studies registered between October 2007 and September 2010, a total of 8942 (21.8%) focused on oncology. Compared with other specialties, oncology trials were more likely to be single arm (62.3% vs 23.8%; P < .001), open label (87.8% vs 47.3%; P < .001), and nonrandomized (63.9% vs 22.7%; P < .001). There was moderate but significant correlation between number of trials conducted by cancer type and associated incidence and mortality (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, 0.56 [P =.04] and 0.77 [P =.001], respectively). More than one-third of all oncology trials were conducted solely outside North America. Conclusions and Relevance : There are significant variations between clinical trials in oncology and other diseases, as well as among trials within oncology. The differences must be better understood to improve both the impact of cancer research on clinical practice and the use of constrained resources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878802996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878802996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.627
DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.627
M3 - Article
C2 - 23699837
AN - SCOPUS:84878802996
SN - 2168-6106
VL - 173
SP - 972
EP - 979
JO - JAMA internal medicine
JF - JAMA internal medicine
IS - 11
ER -