Changing habits of practice: Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings

Judith Bowen, Stephen M. Salerno, John K. Chamberlain, Elizabeth Eckstrom, Helen L. Chen, Suzanne Brandenburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: The majority of health care, both for acute and chronic conditions, is delivered in the ambulatory setting. Despite repeated proposals for change, the majority of internal medicine residency training still occurs in the inpatient setting. Substantial changes in ambulatory education are needed to correct the current imbalance. To assist educators and policy makers in this process, this paper reviews the literature on ambulatory education and makes recommendations for change. METHODS: The authors searched the Medline, Psychlit, and ERIC databases from 2000 to 2004 for studies that focused specifically on curriculum, teaching, and evaluation of internal medicine residents in the ambulatory setting to update previous reviews. Studies had to contain primary data and were reviewed for methodological rigor and relevance. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies met criteria for review. Thirty-five of the studies focused on specific curricular areas and 11 on ambulatory teaching methods. Five involved evaluating performance and 4 focused on structural issues. No study evaluated the overall effectiveness of ambulatory training or investigated the effects of current resident con-tinuity clinic microsystems on education. CONCLUSION: This updated review continues to identify key deficiencies in ambulatory training curriculum and faculty skills. The authors make several recommendations: (1) Make training in the ambulatory setting a priority. (2) Address systems problems in practice environments. (3) Create learning experiences appropriate to the resident's level of development. (4) Teach and evaluate in the examination room. (5) Expand sub specialty-based training to the ambulatory setting. (6) Make faculty development a priority. (7) Create and fund multiinstitutional educational research consortia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1181-1187
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume20
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Internal Medicine
Habits
Education
Curriculum
Teaching
Financial Management
Administrative Personnel
Inpatients
Learning
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • AmbuLatory
  • Curriculum
  • Faculty development
  • Graduate medical education
  • Internal medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Changing habits of practice : Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings. / Bowen, Judith; Salerno, Stephen M.; Chamberlain, John K.; Eckstrom, Elizabeth; Chen, Helen L.; Brandenburg, Suzanne.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 12, 12.2005, p. 1181-1187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bowen, Judith ; Salerno, Stephen M. ; Chamberlain, John K. ; Eckstrom, Elizabeth ; Chen, Helen L. ; Brandenburg, Suzanne. / Changing habits of practice : Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 20, No. 12. pp. 1181-1187.
@article{4834e1267cdf4dd283e58bbaae5dc178,
title = "Changing habits of practice: Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The majority of health care, both for acute and chronic conditions, is delivered in the ambulatory setting. Despite repeated proposals for change, the majority of internal medicine residency training still occurs in the inpatient setting. Substantial changes in ambulatory education are needed to correct the current imbalance. To assist educators and policy makers in this process, this paper reviews the literature on ambulatory education and makes recommendations for change. METHODS: The authors searched the Medline, Psychlit, and ERIC databases from 2000 to 2004 for studies that focused specifically on curriculum, teaching, and evaluation of internal medicine residents in the ambulatory setting to update previous reviews. Studies had to contain primary data and were reviewed for methodological rigor and relevance. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies met criteria for review. Thirty-five of the studies focused on specific curricular areas and 11 on ambulatory teaching methods. Five involved evaluating performance and 4 focused on structural issues. No study evaluated the overall effectiveness of ambulatory training or investigated the effects of current resident con-tinuity clinic microsystems on education. CONCLUSION: This updated review continues to identify key deficiencies in ambulatory training curriculum and faculty skills. The authors make several recommendations: (1) Make training in the ambulatory setting a priority. (2) Address systems problems in practice environments. (3) Create learning experiences appropriate to the resident's level of development. (4) Teach and evaluate in the examination room. (5) Expand sub specialty-based training to the ambulatory setting. (6) Make faculty development a priority. (7) Create and fund multiinstitutional educational research consortia.",
keywords = "AmbuLatory, Curriculum, Faculty development, Graduate medical education, Internal medicine",
author = "Judith Bowen and Salerno, {Stephen M.} and Chamberlain, {John K.} and Elizabeth Eckstrom and Chen, {Helen L.} and Suzanne Brandenburg",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0248.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1181--1187",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing habits of practice

T2 - Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings

AU - Bowen, Judith

AU - Salerno, Stephen M.

AU - Chamberlain, John K.

AU - Eckstrom, Elizabeth

AU - Chen, Helen L.

AU - Brandenburg, Suzanne

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - PURPOSE: The majority of health care, both for acute and chronic conditions, is delivered in the ambulatory setting. Despite repeated proposals for change, the majority of internal medicine residency training still occurs in the inpatient setting. Substantial changes in ambulatory education are needed to correct the current imbalance. To assist educators and policy makers in this process, this paper reviews the literature on ambulatory education and makes recommendations for change. METHODS: The authors searched the Medline, Psychlit, and ERIC databases from 2000 to 2004 for studies that focused specifically on curriculum, teaching, and evaluation of internal medicine residents in the ambulatory setting to update previous reviews. Studies had to contain primary data and were reviewed for methodological rigor and relevance. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies met criteria for review. Thirty-five of the studies focused on specific curricular areas and 11 on ambulatory teaching methods. Five involved evaluating performance and 4 focused on structural issues. No study evaluated the overall effectiveness of ambulatory training or investigated the effects of current resident con-tinuity clinic microsystems on education. CONCLUSION: This updated review continues to identify key deficiencies in ambulatory training curriculum and faculty skills. The authors make several recommendations: (1) Make training in the ambulatory setting a priority. (2) Address systems problems in practice environments. (3) Create learning experiences appropriate to the resident's level of development. (4) Teach and evaluate in the examination room. (5) Expand sub specialty-based training to the ambulatory setting. (6) Make faculty development a priority. (7) Create and fund multiinstitutional educational research consortia.

AB - PURPOSE: The majority of health care, both for acute and chronic conditions, is delivered in the ambulatory setting. Despite repeated proposals for change, the majority of internal medicine residency training still occurs in the inpatient setting. Substantial changes in ambulatory education are needed to correct the current imbalance. To assist educators and policy makers in this process, this paper reviews the literature on ambulatory education and makes recommendations for change. METHODS: The authors searched the Medline, Psychlit, and ERIC databases from 2000 to 2004 for studies that focused specifically on curriculum, teaching, and evaluation of internal medicine residents in the ambulatory setting to update previous reviews. Studies had to contain primary data and were reviewed for methodological rigor and relevance. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies met criteria for review. Thirty-five of the studies focused on specific curricular areas and 11 on ambulatory teaching methods. Five involved evaluating performance and 4 focused on structural issues. No study evaluated the overall effectiveness of ambulatory training or investigated the effects of current resident con-tinuity clinic microsystems on education. CONCLUSION: This updated review continues to identify key deficiencies in ambulatory training curriculum and faculty skills. The authors make several recommendations: (1) Make training in the ambulatory setting a priority. (2) Address systems problems in practice environments. (3) Create learning experiences appropriate to the resident's level of development. (4) Teach and evaluate in the examination room. (5) Expand sub specialty-based training to the ambulatory setting. (6) Make faculty development a priority. (7) Create and fund multiinstitutional educational research consortia.

KW - AmbuLatory

KW - Curriculum

KW - Faculty development

KW - Graduate medical education

KW - Internal medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30944454238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30944454238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0248.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0248.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16423112

AN - SCOPUS:30944454238

VL - 20

SP - 1181

EP - 1187

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 12

ER -