Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research

William (Bill) Hersh, Mark G. Weiner, Peter J. Embi, Judith (Judy) Logan, Philip R O Payne, Elmer V. Bernstam, Harold P. Lehmann, George Hripcsak, Timothy H. Hartzog, James J. Cimino, Joel H. Saltz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

158 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The growing amount of data in operational electronic health record systems provides unprecedented opportunity for its reuse for many tasks, including comparative effectiveness research. However, there are many caveats to the use of such data. Electronic health record data from clinical settings may be inaccurate, incomplete, transformed in ways that undermine their meaning, unrecoverable for research, of unknown provenance, of insufficient granularity, and incompatible with research protocols. However, the quantity and real-world nature of these data provide impetus for their use, and we develop a list of caveats to inform would-be users of such data as well as provide an informatics roadmap that aims to insure this opportunity to augment comparative effectiveness research can be best leveraged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedical Care
Volume51
Issue number8 SUPPL.3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Comparative Effectiveness Research
Electronic Health Records
Informatics
Research

Keywords

  • biomedical informatics
  • clinical data
  • coded (claims) data
  • comparative effectiveness research
  • electronic health records

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. / Hersh, William (Bill); Weiner, Mark G.; Embi, Peter J.; Logan, Judith (Judy); Payne, Philip R O; Bernstam, Elmer V.; Lehmann, Harold P.; Hripcsak, George; Hartzog, Timothy H.; Cimino, James J.; Saltz, Joel H.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 51, No. 8 SUPPL.3, 08.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hersh, WB, Weiner, MG, Embi, PJ, Logan, JJ, Payne, PRO, Bernstam, EV, Lehmann, HP, Hripcsak, G, Hartzog, TH, Cimino, JJ & Saltz, JH 2013, 'Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research', Medical Care, vol. 51, no. 8 SUPPL.3. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1dbd
Hersh, William (Bill) ; Weiner, Mark G. ; Embi, Peter J. ; Logan, Judith (Judy) ; Payne, Philip R O ; Bernstam, Elmer V. ; Lehmann, Harold P. ; Hripcsak, George ; Hartzog, Timothy H. ; Cimino, James J. ; Saltz, Joel H. / Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. In: Medical Care. 2013 ; Vol. 51, No. 8 SUPPL.3.
@article{8b6c9fb642bf4ecfa5f53c95a86057f5,
title = "Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research",
abstract = "The growing amount of data in operational electronic health record systems provides unprecedented opportunity for its reuse for many tasks, including comparative effectiveness research. However, there are many caveats to the use of such data. Electronic health record data from clinical settings may be inaccurate, incomplete, transformed in ways that undermine their meaning, unrecoverable for research, of unknown provenance, of insufficient granularity, and incompatible with research protocols. However, the quantity and real-world nature of these data provide impetus for their use, and we develop a list of caveats to inform would-be users of such data as well as provide an informatics roadmap that aims to insure this opportunity to augment comparative effectiveness research can be best leveraged.",
keywords = "biomedical informatics, clinical data, coded (claims) data, comparative effectiveness research, electronic health records",
author = "Hersh, {William (Bill)} and Weiner, {Mark G.} and Embi, {Peter J.} and Logan, {Judith (Judy)} and Payne, {Philip R O} and Bernstam, {Elmer V.} and Lehmann, {Harold P.} and George Hripcsak and Hartzog, {Timothy H.} and Cimino, {James J.} and Saltz, {Joel H.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1dbd",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8 SUPPL.3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research

AU - Hersh, William (Bill)

AU - Weiner, Mark G.

AU - Embi, Peter J.

AU - Logan, Judith (Judy)

AU - Payne, Philip R O

AU - Bernstam, Elmer V.

AU - Lehmann, Harold P.

AU - Hripcsak, George

AU - Hartzog, Timothy H.

AU - Cimino, James J.

AU - Saltz, Joel H.

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - The growing amount of data in operational electronic health record systems provides unprecedented opportunity for its reuse for many tasks, including comparative effectiveness research. However, there are many caveats to the use of such data. Electronic health record data from clinical settings may be inaccurate, incomplete, transformed in ways that undermine their meaning, unrecoverable for research, of unknown provenance, of insufficient granularity, and incompatible with research protocols. However, the quantity and real-world nature of these data provide impetus for their use, and we develop a list of caveats to inform would-be users of such data as well as provide an informatics roadmap that aims to insure this opportunity to augment comparative effectiveness research can be best leveraged.

AB - The growing amount of data in operational electronic health record systems provides unprecedented opportunity for its reuse for many tasks, including comparative effectiveness research. However, there are many caveats to the use of such data. Electronic health record data from clinical settings may be inaccurate, incomplete, transformed in ways that undermine their meaning, unrecoverable for research, of unknown provenance, of insufficient granularity, and incompatible with research protocols. However, the quantity and real-world nature of these data provide impetus for their use, and we develop a list of caveats to inform would-be users of such data as well as provide an informatics roadmap that aims to insure this opportunity to augment comparative effectiveness research can be best leveraged.

KW - biomedical informatics

KW - clinical data

KW - coded (claims) data

KW - comparative effectiveness research

KW - electronic health records

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879885267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879885267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1dbd

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1dbd

M3 - Article

C2 - 23774517

AN - SCOPUS:84879885267

VL - 51

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 8 SUPPL.3

ER -