Cancer Survivorship in Rural and Urban Adults: A Descriptive and Mixed Methods Study

Julie A. McNulty, Lillian Nail

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: Rural-dwelling cancer survivors (CSs) are at risk for decrements in health and well-being due to decreased access to health care and support resources. This study compares the impact of cancer in rural- and urban-dwelling adult CSs living in 2 regions of the Pacific Northwest. Methods: A convenience sample of posttreatment adult CSs (N = 132) completed the Impact of Cancer version 2 (IOCv2) and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-short form. High and low scorers on the IOCv2 participated in an in-depth interview (n = 19). Findings: The sample was predominantly middle-aged (mean age 58) and female (84%). Mean time since treatment completion was 6.7 years. Cancer diagnoses represented included breast (56%), gynecologic (9%), lymphoma (8%), head and neck (6%), and colorectal (5%). Comparisons across geographic regions show statistically significant differences in body concerns, worry, negative impact, and employment concerns. Rural-urban differences from interview data include access to health care, care coordination, connecting/community, thinking about death and dying, public/private journey, and advocacy. Conclusion: The insights into the differences and similarities between rural and urban CSs challenge the prevalent assumptions about rural-dwelling CSs and their risk for negative outcomes. A common theme across the study findings was community. Access to health care may not be the driver of the survivorship experience. Findings can influence health care providers and survivorship program development, building on the strengths of both rural and urban living and the engagement of the survivorship community.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)282-291
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Rural Health
    Volume31
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    Survival Rate
    Survivors
    Neoplasms
    Health Services Accessibility
    Northwestern United States
    Interviews
    Program Development
    Symptom Assessment
    Health Personnel
    Lymphoma
    Breast
    Neck
    Head
    Health

    Keywords

    • Cancer survivorship
    • Impact of cancer
    • Late effects
    • Rural health
    • Rural-urban cancer survivorship

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this

    Cancer Survivorship in Rural and Urban Adults : A Descriptive and Mixed Methods Study. / McNulty, Julie A.; Nail, Lillian.

    In: Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 31, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 282-291.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    McNulty, Julie A. ; Nail, Lillian. / Cancer Survivorship in Rural and Urban Adults : A Descriptive and Mixed Methods Study. In: Journal of Rural Health. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 282-291.
    @article{80f9227929a64960ae30086cbcfb62f5,
    title = "Cancer Survivorship in Rural and Urban Adults: A Descriptive and Mixed Methods Study",
    abstract = "Purpose: Rural-dwelling cancer survivors (CSs) are at risk for decrements in health and well-being due to decreased access to health care and support resources. This study compares the impact of cancer in rural- and urban-dwelling adult CSs living in 2 regions of the Pacific Northwest. Methods: A convenience sample of posttreatment adult CSs (N = 132) completed the Impact of Cancer version 2 (IOCv2) and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-short form. High and low scorers on the IOCv2 participated in an in-depth interview (n = 19). Findings: The sample was predominantly middle-aged (mean age 58) and female (84{\%}). Mean time since treatment completion was 6.7 years. Cancer diagnoses represented included breast (56{\%}), gynecologic (9{\%}), lymphoma (8{\%}), head and neck (6{\%}), and colorectal (5{\%}). Comparisons across geographic regions show statistically significant differences in body concerns, worry, negative impact, and employment concerns. Rural-urban differences from interview data include access to health care, care coordination, connecting/community, thinking about death and dying, public/private journey, and advocacy. Conclusion: The insights into the differences and similarities between rural and urban CSs challenge the prevalent assumptions about rural-dwelling CSs and their risk for negative outcomes. A common theme across the study findings was community. Access to health care may not be the driver of the survivorship experience. Findings can influence health care providers and survivorship program development, building on the strengths of both rural and urban living and the engagement of the survivorship community.",
    keywords = "Cancer survivorship, Impact of cancer, Late effects, Rural health, Rural-urban cancer survivorship",
    author = "McNulty, {Julie A.} and Lillian Nail",
    year = "2015",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/jrh.12106",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "282--291",
    journal = "Journal of Rural Health",
    issn = "0890-765X",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Cancer Survivorship in Rural and Urban Adults

    T2 - A Descriptive and Mixed Methods Study

    AU - McNulty, Julie A.

    AU - Nail, Lillian

    PY - 2015/6/1

    Y1 - 2015/6/1

    N2 - Purpose: Rural-dwelling cancer survivors (CSs) are at risk for decrements in health and well-being due to decreased access to health care and support resources. This study compares the impact of cancer in rural- and urban-dwelling adult CSs living in 2 regions of the Pacific Northwest. Methods: A convenience sample of posttreatment adult CSs (N = 132) completed the Impact of Cancer version 2 (IOCv2) and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-short form. High and low scorers on the IOCv2 participated in an in-depth interview (n = 19). Findings: The sample was predominantly middle-aged (mean age 58) and female (84%). Mean time since treatment completion was 6.7 years. Cancer diagnoses represented included breast (56%), gynecologic (9%), lymphoma (8%), head and neck (6%), and colorectal (5%). Comparisons across geographic regions show statistically significant differences in body concerns, worry, negative impact, and employment concerns. Rural-urban differences from interview data include access to health care, care coordination, connecting/community, thinking about death and dying, public/private journey, and advocacy. Conclusion: The insights into the differences and similarities between rural and urban CSs challenge the prevalent assumptions about rural-dwelling CSs and their risk for negative outcomes. A common theme across the study findings was community. Access to health care may not be the driver of the survivorship experience. Findings can influence health care providers and survivorship program development, building on the strengths of both rural and urban living and the engagement of the survivorship community.

    AB - Purpose: Rural-dwelling cancer survivors (CSs) are at risk for decrements in health and well-being due to decreased access to health care and support resources. This study compares the impact of cancer in rural- and urban-dwelling adult CSs living in 2 regions of the Pacific Northwest. Methods: A convenience sample of posttreatment adult CSs (N = 132) completed the Impact of Cancer version 2 (IOCv2) and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-short form. High and low scorers on the IOCv2 participated in an in-depth interview (n = 19). Findings: The sample was predominantly middle-aged (mean age 58) and female (84%). Mean time since treatment completion was 6.7 years. Cancer diagnoses represented included breast (56%), gynecologic (9%), lymphoma (8%), head and neck (6%), and colorectal (5%). Comparisons across geographic regions show statistically significant differences in body concerns, worry, negative impact, and employment concerns. Rural-urban differences from interview data include access to health care, care coordination, connecting/community, thinking about death and dying, public/private journey, and advocacy. Conclusion: The insights into the differences and similarities between rural and urban CSs challenge the prevalent assumptions about rural-dwelling CSs and their risk for negative outcomes. A common theme across the study findings was community. Access to health care may not be the driver of the survivorship experience. Findings can influence health care providers and survivorship program development, building on the strengths of both rural and urban living and the engagement of the survivorship community.

    KW - Cancer survivorship

    KW - Impact of cancer

    KW - Late effects

    KW - Rural health

    KW - Rural-urban cancer survivorship

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934434224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934434224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/jrh.12106

    DO - 10.1111/jrh.12106

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 25599984

    AN - SCOPUS:84934434224

    VL - 31

    SP - 282

    EP - 291

    JO - Journal of Rural Health

    JF - Journal of Rural Health

    SN - 0890-765X

    IS - 3

    ER -