Cancer Rehabilitation: An Overview of Current Need, Delivery Models, and Levels of Care

Andrea L. Cheville, Karen Mustian, Kerri Winters-Stone, David S. Zucker, Gail L. Gamble, Catherine M. Alfano

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relevance of cancer rehabilitation as a public health issue grows steadily as cancer incidence, survival, and mean patient age increase. Reported rates of physical impairment and disability are already high, prior to the anticipated influx of aged cancer survivors. Despite the high prevalence of cancer-related disablement, treatment rates, even for readily remediable physical impairments, are as low as 1–2%. In addition to low referral rates, a challenge to patient-centric cancer rehabilitation is a fractured system that requires multiple visits to a range of specialists to address even a single issue, and cancer survivors generally have several. Effective solutions must acknowledge the limited cancer rehabilitation clinical work force and its clustering in tertiary centers, as well as the lack of consensus regarding the essential and effective components of a cancer rehabilitation program. A number of models of cancer rehabilitation service delivery have been developed, but, as yet, none have been empirically validated. This paper describes these models and proposes a taxonomy for stratifying the needs of cancer survivors. Modalities used to preserve or restore function among survivors range from simple, relatively intuitive activities to complex, integrated programs that include diagnostic and multi-modal pharmacological, manual, and even procedural interventions. Criteria for determining a survivor's needs across this spectrum are proposed, and the role of the physiatrist as a vital advocate and champion discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Survivors
Neoplasms
Second Primary Neoplasms
Cluster Analysis
Referral and Consultation
Public Health
Pharmacology
Survival
Incidence

Keywords

  • Cancer rehabilitation
  • Delivery models
  • Levels of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Cancer Rehabilitation : An Overview of Current Need, Delivery Models, and Levels of Care. / Cheville, Andrea L.; Mustian, Karen; Winters-Stone, Kerri; Zucker, David S.; Gamble, Gail L.; Alfano, Catherine M.

In: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Cheville, Andrea L. ; Mustian, Karen ; Winters-Stone, Kerri ; Zucker, David S. ; Gamble, Gail L. ; Alfano, Catherine M. / Cancer Rehabilitation : An Overview of Current Need, Delivery Models, and Levels of Care. In: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 2017 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 1-17.
@article{982a1c7f61fa485f864517ca68e81a12,
title = "Cancer Rehabilitation: An Overview of Current Need, Delivery Models, and Levels of Care",
abstract = "The relevance of cancer rehabilitation as a public health issue grows steadily as cancer incidence, survival, and mean patient age increase. Reported rates of physical impairment and disability are already high, prior to the anticipated influx of aged cancer survivors. Despite the high prevalence of cancer-related disablement, treatment rates, even for readily remediable physical impairments, are as low as 1–2{\%}. In addition to low referral rates, a challenge to patient-centric cancer rehabilitation is a fractured system that requires multiple visits to a range of specialists to address even a single issue, and cancer survivors generally have several. Effective solutions must acknowledge the limited cancer rehabilitation clinical work force and its clustering in tertiary centers, as well as the lack of consensus regarding the essential and effective components of a cancer rehabilitation program. A number of models of cancer rehabilitation service delivery have been developed, but, as yet, none have been empirically validated. This paper describes these models and proposes a taxonomy for stratifying the needs of cancer survivors. Modalities used to preserve or restore function among survivors range from simple, relatively intuitive activities to complex, integrated programs that include diagnostic and multi-modal pharmacological, manual, and even procedural interventions. Criteria for determining a survivor's needs across this spectrum are proposed, and the role of the physiatrist as a vital advocate and champion discussed.",
keywords = "Cancer rehabilitation, Delivery models, Levels of care",
author = "Cheville, {Andrea L.} and Karen Mustian and Kerri Winters-Stone and Zucker, {David S.} and Gamble, {Gail L.} and Alfano, {Catherine M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pmr.2016.08.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America",
issn = "1047-9651",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cancer Rehabilitation

T2 - An Overview of Current Need, Delivery Models, and Levels of Care

AU - Cheville, Andrea L.

AU - Mustian, Karen

AU - Winters-Stone, Kerri

AU - Zucker, David S.

AU - Gamble, Gail L.

AU - Alfano, Catherine M.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - The relevance of cancer rehabilitation as a public health issue grows steadily as cancer incidence, survival, and mean patient age increase. Reported rates of physical impairment and disability are already high, prior to the anticipated influx of aged cancer survivors. Despite the high prevalence of cancer-related disablement, treatment rates, even for readily remediable physical impairments, are as low as 1–2%. In addition to low referral rates, a challenge to patient-centric cancer rehabilitation is a fractured system that requires multiple visits to a range of specialists to address even a single issue, and cancer survivors generally have several. Effective solutions must acknowledge the limited cancer rehabilitation clinical work force and its clustering in tertiary centers, as well as the lack of consensus regarding the essential and effective components of a cancer rehabilitation program. A number of models of cancer rehabilitation service delivery have been developed, but, as yet, none have been empirically validated. This paper describes these models and proposes a taxonomy for stratifying the needs of cancer survivors. Modalities used to preserve or restore function among survivors range from simple, relatively intuitive activities to complex, integrated programs that include diagnostic and multi-modal pharmacological, manual, and even procedural interventions. Criteria for determining a survivor's needs across this spectrum are proposed, and the role of the physiatrist as a vital advocate and champion discussed.

AB - The relevance of cancer rehabilitation as a public health issue grows steadily as cancer incidence, survival, and mean patient age increase. Reported rates of physical impairment and disability are already high, prior to the anticipated influx of aged cancer survivors. Despite the high prevalence of cancer-related disablement, treatment rates, even for readily remediable physical impairments, are as low as 1–2%. In addition to low referral rates, a challenge to patient-centric cancer rehabilitation is a fractured system that requires multiple visits to a range of specialists to address even a single issue, and cancer survivors generally have several. Effective solutions must acknowledge the limited cancer rehabilitation clinical work force and its clustering in tertiary centers, as well as the lack of consensus regarding the essential and effective components of a cancer rehabilitation program. A number of models of cancer rehabilitation service delivery have been developed, but, as yet, none have been empirically validated. This paper describes these models and proposes a taxonomy for stratifying the needs of cancer survivors. Modalities used to preserve or restore function among survivors range from simple, relatively intuitive activities to complex, integrated programs that include diagnostic and multi-modal pharmacological, manual, and even procedural interventions. Criteria for determining a survivor's needs across this spectrum are proposed, and the role of the physiatrist as a vital advocate and champion discussed.

KW - Cancer rehabilitation

KW - Delivery models

KW - Levels of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84998812260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84998812260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pmr.2016.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.pmr.2016.08.001

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27912990

AN - SCOPUS:84998812260

VL - 28

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

JF - Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

SN - 1047-9651

IS - 1

ER -