Can Nutritional Assessment Tools Predict Response to Nutritional Therapy?

Chirag Patel, Endashaw Omer, Sarah Diamond, Stephen A. McClave

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditional tools and scoring systems for nutritional assessment have focused solely on parameters of poor nutritional status in the past, in an effort to define the elusive concept of malnutrition. Such tools fail to account for the contribution of disease severity to overall nutritional risk. High nutritional risk, caused by either deterioration of nutritional status or greater disease severity (or a combination of both factors), puts the patient in a metabolic stress state characterized by adverse outcome and increased complications. Newer scoring systems for determining nutritional risk, such as the Nutric Score and the Nutritional Risk Score-2002 have created a paradigm shift connecting assessment and treatment with quality outcome measures of success. Clinicians now have the opportunity to identify high risk patients through their initial assessment, provide adequate or sufficient nutrition therapy, and expect improved patient outcomes as a result. These concepts are supported by observational and prospective interventional trials. Greater clinical experience and refinement in these scoring systems are needed in the future to optimize patient response to nutrition therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number15
JournalCurrent Gastroenterology Reports
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Nutrition Assessment
Nutrition Therapy
Nutritional Status
Therapeutics
Physiological Stress
Malnutrition
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Malnutrition
  • Nutritional assessment
  • Nutritional risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Can Nutritional Assessment Tools Predict Response to Nutritional Therapy? / Patel, Chirag; Omer, Endashaw; Diamond, Sarah; McClave, Stephen A.

In: Current Gastroenterology Reports, Vol. 18, No. 4, 15, 01.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, Chirag ; Omer, Endashaw ; Diamond, Sarah ; McClave, Stephen A. / Can Nutritional Assessment Tools Predict Response to Nutritional Therapy?. In: Current Gastroenterology Reports. 2016 ; Vol. 18, No. 4.
@article{a1566f06a09c4cadbb775d41ff62a8ce,
title = "Can Nutritional Assessment Tools Predict Response to Nutritional Therapy?",
abstract = "Traditional tools and scoring systems for nutritional assessment have focused solely on parameters of poor nutritional status in the past, in an effort to define the elusive concept of malnutrition. Such tools fail to account for the contribution of disease severity to overall nutritional risk. High nutritional risk, caused by either deterioration of nutritional status or greater disease severity (or a combination of both factors), puts the patient in a metabolic stress state characterized by adverse outcome and increased complications. Newer scoring systems for determining nutritional risk, such as the Nutric Score and the Nutritional Risk Score-2002 have created a paradigm shift connecting assessment and treatment with quality outcome measures of success. Clinicians now have the opportunity to identify high risk patients through their initial assessment, provide adequate or sufficient nutrition therapy, and expect improved patient outcomes as a result. These concepts are supported by observational and prospective interventional trials. Greater clinical experience and refinement in these scoring systems are needed in the future to optimize patient response to nutrition therapy.",
keywords = "Malnutrition, Nutritional assessment, Nutritional risk",
author = "Chirag Patel and Endashaw Omer and Sarah Diamond and McClave, {Stephen A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11894-016-0488-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Current Gastroenterology Reports",
issn = "1522-8037",
publisher = "Current Medicine Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can Nutritional Assessment Tools Predict Response to Nutritional Therapy?

AU - Patel, Chirag

AU - Omer, Endashaw

AU - Diamond, Sarah

AU - McClave, Stephen A.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Traditional tools and scoring systems for nutritional assessment have focused solely on parameters of poor nutritional status in the past, in an effort to define the elusive concept of malnutrition. Such tools fail to account for the contribution of disease severity to overall nutritional risk. High nutritional risk, caused by either deterioration of nutritional status or greater disease severity (or a combination of both factors), puts the patient in a metabolic stress state characterized by adverse outcome and increased complications. Newer scoring systems for determining nutritional risk, such as the Nutric Score and the Nutritional Risk Score-2002 have created a paradigm shift connecting assessment and treatment with quality outcome measures of success. Clinicians now have the opportunity to identify high risk patients through their initial assessment, provide adequate or sufficient nutrition therapy, and expect improved patient outcomes as a result. These concepts are supported by observational and prospective interventional trials. Greater clinical experience and refinement in these scoring systems are needed in the future to optimize patient response to nutrition therapy.

AB - Traditional tools and scoring systems for nutritional assessment have focused solely on parameters of poor nutritional status in the past, in an effort to define the elusive concept of malnutrition. Such tools fail to account for the contribution of disease severity to overall nutritional risk. High nutritional risk, caused by either deterioration of nutritional status or greater disease severity (or a combination of both factors), puts the patient in a metabolic stress state characterized by adverse outcome and increased complications. Newer scoring systems for determining nutritional risk, such as the Nutric Score and the Nutritional Risk Score-2002 have created a paradigm shift connecting assessment and treatment with quality outcome measures of success. Clinicians now have the opportunity to identify high risk patients through their initial assessment, provide adequate or sufficient nutrition therapy, and expect improved patient outcomes as a result. These concepts are supported by observational and prospective interventional trials. Greater clinical experience and refinement in these scoring systems are needed in the future to optimize patient response to nutrition therapy.

KW - Malnutrition

KW - Nutritional assessment

KW - Nutritional risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959517359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959517359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11894-016-0488-y

DO - 10.1007/s11894-016-0488-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 26936031

AN - SCOPUS:84959517359

VL - 18

JO - Current Gastroenterology Reports

JF - Current Gastroenterology Reports

SN - 1522-8037

IS - 4

M1 - 15

ER -