Can neoplastic cystic masses in the head of the pancreas be safely and adequately removed without a whipple resection?

Dana Andersen, Howard A. Reber, William M. Steinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The minimal increase in operative mortality and long-term morbidity rates associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with enucleation should not justify broad adoption of this oncologically inadequate operation for cystic neoplasms in the head of the pancreas. With the current state of both preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic techniques, even the best clinicians may not be able to reliably distinguish between benign and malignant cystic neoplasms. This risks the enucleation of a malignant cystic neoplasm and the lost chance for a curative resection. Enucleation of a side branch IPMN deprives the surgeon and the patient of information about the extent of the disease and the ability to eradicate more advanced disease that could progress to invasive malignancy. Thus, IPMN should not be managed in this fashion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)721-727
Number of pages7
JournalPancreas
Volume38
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pancreas
Neoplasms
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Morbidity
Mortality
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Can neoplastic cystic masses in the head of the pancreas be safely and adequately removed without a whipple resection? / Andersen, Dana; Reber, Howard A.; Steinberg, William M.

In: Pancreas, Vol. 38, No. 7, 10.2009, p. 721-727.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce14876b03bb4725a7821d74db5bd1a9,
title = "Can neoplastic cystic masses in the head of the pancreas be safely and adequately removed without a whipple resection?",
abstract = "The minimal increase in operative mortality and long-term morbidity rates associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with enucleation should not justify broad adoption of this oncologically inadequate operation for cystic neoplasms in the head of the pancreas. With the current state of both preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic techniques, even the best clinicians may not be able to reliably distinguish between benign and malignant cystic neoplasms. This risks the enucleation of a malignant cystic neoplasm and the lost chance for a curative resection. Enucleation of a side branch IPMN deprives the surgeon and the patient of information about the extent of the disease and the ability to eradicate more advanced disease that could progress to invasive malignancy. Thus, IPMN should not be managed in this fashion.",
author = "Dana Andersen and Reber, {Howard A.} and Steinberg, {William M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ae0c5b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "721--727",
journal = "Pancreas",
issn = "0885-3177",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can neoplastic cystic masses in the head of the pancreas be safely and adequately removed without a whipple resection?

AU - Andersen, Dana

AU - Reber, Howard A.

AU - Steinberg, William M.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - The minimal increase in operative mortality and long-term morbidity rates associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with enucleation should not justify broad adoption of this oncologically inadequate operation for cystic neoplasms in the head of the pancreas. With the current state of both preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic techniques, even the best clinicians may not be able to reliably distinguish between benign and malignant cystic neoplasms. This risks the enucleation of a malignant cystic neoplasm and the lost chance for a curative resection. Enucleation of a side branch IPMN deprives the surgeon and the patient of information about the extent of the disease and the ability to eradicate more advanced disease that could progress to invasive malignancy. Thus, IPMN should not be managed in this fashion.

AB - The minimal increase in operative mortality and long-term morbidity rates associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with enucleation should not justify broad adoption of this oncologically inadequate operation for cystic neoplasms in the head of the pancreas. With the current state of both preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic techniques, even the best clinicians may not be able to reliably distinguish between benign and malignant cystic neoplasms. This risks the enucleation of a malignant cystic neoplasm and the lost chance for a curative resection. Enucleation of a side branch IPMN deprives the surgeon and the patient of information about the extent of the disease and the ability to eradicate more advanced disease that could progress to invasive malignancy. Thus, IPMN should not be managed in this fashion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349934519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349934519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ae0c5b

DO - 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ae0c5b

M3 - Article

C2 - 19893452

AN - SCOPUS:70349934519

VL - 38

SP - 721

EP - 727

JO - Pancreas

JF - Pancreas

SN - 0885-3177

IS - 7

ER -