Can major systematic reviews influence practice patterns? A case study of episiotomy trends

Yu Chu Shen, Wee Chung Sim, Aaron Caughey, David H. Howard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures among women of childbearing age in the United States. In 2005, a major systematic review conducted by Hartmann and colleagues recommended against routine use of episiotomy and was widely covered in the media. We assessed the impact of the Hartman et al. study on episiotomy trend. Methods: Based on 100 % hospital discharge data from eight states in 2003-2008, we used interrupted time series regression models to estimate the impact of the Hartman et al. review on episiotomy rates. We used mixed-effects regression models to assess whether interhospital variation was reduced over time. Results: After controlling for underlying trend, episiotomy rates dropped by 1.4 percentage points after Hartman et al. publication (p <0.01 for spontaneous delivery; p <0.1 for operative delivery). The publication has smaller effect on government hospitals as compared to private hospitals. Mixed effects models estimated negative correlation between cross-time and cross-hospital variations in episiotomy rates, indicating reduced cross-hospital variation over time. Conclusions: Our results suggested that there has been a gradual decline in episiotomy rates over the period 2003-2008, and that synthesis of evidence showing harms from routine episiotomy had limited impact on practice patterns in the case of episiotomy. The experience of episiotomy illustrates the challenge of using comparative effectiveness and evidenced-based medicine to reduce use of unnecessary procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1285-1293
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume288
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Episiotomy
Publications
Unnecessary Procedures
Private Hospitals
Medicine

Keywords

  • Episiotomy
  • Interrupted time series regression models
  • Practice pattern

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Can major systematic reviews influence practice patterns? A case study of episiotomy trends. / Shen, Yu Chu; Sim, Wee Chung; Caughey, Aaron; Howard, David H.

In: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 288, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 1285-1293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shen, Yu Chu ; Sim, Wee Chung ; Caughey, Aaron ; Howard, David H. / Can major systematic reviews influence practice patterns? A case study of episiotomy trends. In: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2013 ; Vol. 288, No. 6. pp. 1285-1293.
@article{9fec8f6ab6dd40159543bb9230022020,
title = "Can major systematic reviews influence practice patterns? A case study of episiotomy trends",
abstract = "Purpose: Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures among women of childbearing age in the United States. In 2005, a major systematic review conducted by Hartmann and colleagues recommended against routine use of episiotomy and was widely covered in the media. We assessed the impact of the Hartman et al. study on episiotomy trend. Methods: Based on 100 {\%} hospital discharge data from eight states in 2003-2008, we used interrupted time series regression models to estimate the impact of the Hartman et al. review on episiotomy rates. We used mixed-effects regression models to assess whether interhospital variation was reduced over time. Results: After controlling for underlying trend, episiotomy rates dropped by 1.4 percentage points after Hartman et al. publication (p <0.01 for spontaneous delivery; p <0.1 for operative delivery). The publication has smaller effect on government hospitals as compared to private hospitals. Mixed effects models estimated negative correlation between cross-time and cross-hospital variations in episiotomy rates, indicating reduced cross-hospital variation over time. Conclusions: Our results suggested that there has been a gradual decline in episiotomy rates over the period 2003-2008, and that synthesis of evidence showing harms from routine episiotomy had limited impact on practice patterns in the case of episiotomy. The experience of episiotomy illustrates the challenge of using comparative effectiveness and evidenced-based medicine to reduce use of unnecessary procedures.",
keywords = "Episiotomy, Interrupted time series regression models, Practice pattern",
author = "Shen, {Yu Chu} and Sim, {Wee Chung} and Aaron Caughey and Howard, {David H.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00404-013-2904-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "288",
pages = "1285--1293",
journal = "Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "0932-0067",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can major systematic reviews influence practice patterns? A case study of episiotomy trends

AU - Shen, Yu Chu

AU - Sim, Wee Chung

AU - Caughey, Aaron

AU - Howard, David H.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Purpose: Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures among women of childbearing age in the United States. In 2005, a major systematic review conducted by Hartmann and colleagues recommended against routine use of episiotomy and was widely covered in the media. We assessed the impact of the Hartman et al. study on episiotomy trend. Methods: Based on 100 % hospital discharge data from eight states in 2003-2008, we used interrupted time series regression models to estimate the impact of the Hartman et al. review on episiotomy rates. We used mixed-effects regression models to assess whether interhospital variation was reduced over time. Results: After controlling for underlying trend, episiotomy rates dropped by 1.4 percentage points after Hartman et al. publication (p <0.01 for spontaneous delivery; p <0.1 for operative delivery). The publication has smaller effect on government hospitals as compared to private hospitals. Mixed effects models estimated negative correlation between cross-time and cross-hospital variations in episiotomy rates, indicating reduced cross-hospital variation over time. Conclusions: Our results suggested that there has been a gradual decline in episiotomy rates over the period 2003-2008, and that synthesis of evidence showing harms from routine episiotomy had limited impact on practice patterns in the case of episiotomy. The experience of episiotomy illustrates the challenge of using comparative effectiveness and evidenced-based medicine to reduce use of unnecessary procedures.

AB - Purpose: Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures among women of childbearing age in the United States. In 2005, a major systematic review conducted by Hartmann and colleagues recommended against routine use of episiotomy and was widely covered in the media. We assessed the impact of the Hartman et al. study on episiotomy trend. Methods: Based on 100 % hospital discharge data from eight states in 2003-2008, we used interrupted time series regression models to estimate the impact of the Hartman et al. review on episiotomy rates. We used mixed-effects regression models to assess whether interhospital variation was reduced over time. Results: After controlling for underlying trend, episiotomy rates dropped by 1.4 percentage points after Hartman et al. publication (p <0.01 for spontaneous delivery; p <0.1 for operative delivery). The publication has smaller effect on government hospitals as compared to private hospitals. Mixed effects models estimated negative correlation between cross-time and cross-hospital variations in episiotomy rates, indicating reduced cross-hospital variation over time. Conclusions: Our results suggested that there has been a gradual decline in episiotomy rates over the period 2003-2008, and that synthesis of evidence showing harms from routine episiotomy had limited impact on practice patterns in the case of episiotomy. The experience of episiotomy illustrates the challenge of using comparative effectiveness and evidenced-based medicine to reduce use of unnecessary procedures.

KW - Episiotomy

KW - Interrupted time series regression models

KW - Practice pattern

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889082355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889082355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00404-013-2904-y

DO - 10.1007/s00404-013-2904-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 23764930

AN - SCOPUS:84889082355

VL - 288

SP - 1285

EP - 1293

JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

SN - 0932-0067

IS - 6

ER -