Can administrative data identify incident cases of colorectal cancer? A comparison of two health plans

Scott D. Ramsey, Margaret T. Mandelson, Ruth Etzioni, Robert Harrison, Robert Smith, Stephen Taplin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although commercial health insurance records are a potentially valuable source of data for cancer outcomes studies, the accuracy of administrative codes for identifying persons with cancer is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of administrative codes for identifying persons with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. The Washington state SEER cancer registry was linked with enrollment files from two large commercial health plans: a fee-for-service plan and a staff-model HMO with combined enrollment of more than 1.7 million. The accuracy of ICD-9 codes for colorectal cancer for enrollees diagnosed between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 1999 was compared for each plan, using SEER records as the "gold standard." The positive predictive value of administrative codes was 33.4% at the fee-for-service plan and 30.1% at the HMO plan (difference p = 0.26). The overall sensitivity of administrative codes was 91.7% at the fee-for-service plan and 93.1% at the HMO plan (difference p = 0.09). Positive predictive values were higher for inpatient records, while sensitivity was higher for outpatient records and for those with more advanced tumor stages at diagnosis. In conclusion, administrative records for identifying new cases of colorectal cancer in two large health plans showed poor positive predictive value but high sensitivity. Accuracy did not vary substantially by insurance plan. Researchers without tumor registry or other high-quality sources to verify records should not rely on administrative data alone from commercial health plans to identify incident colorectal cancer cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-37
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colorectal Neoplasms
Fee-for-Service Plans
Health Maintenance Organizations
Health
International Classification of Diseases
Neoplasms
Registries
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health Insurance
Insurance
Inpatients
Outpatients
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Administrative data
  • Cancer registry
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Positive predictive value
  • Sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Can administrative data identify incident cases of colorectal cancer? A comparison of two health plans. / Ramsey, Scott D.; Mandelson, Margaret T.; Etzioni, Ruth; Harrison, Robert; Smith, Robert; Taplin, Stephen.

In: Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.03.2004, p. 27-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramsey, Scott D. ; Mandelson, Margaret T. ; Etzioni, Ruth ; Harrison, Robert ; Smith, Robert ; Taplin, Stephen. / Can administrative data identify incident cases of colorectal cancer? A comparison of two health plans. In: Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology. 2004 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 27-37.
@article{b7aa051e0ab94a78b73a86f922ac771e,
title = "Can administrative data identify incident cases of colorectal cancer? A comparison of two health plans",
abstract = "Although commercial health insurance records are a potentially valuable source of data for cancer outcomes studies, the accuracy of administrative codes for identifying persons with cancer is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of administrative codes for identifying persons with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. The Washington state SEER cancer registry was linked with enrollment files from two large commercial health plans: a fee-for-service plan and a staff-model HMO with combined enrollment of more than 1.7 million. The accuracy of ICD-9 codes for colorectal cancer for enrollees diagnosed between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 1999 was compared for each plan, using SEER records as the {"}gold standard.{"} The positive predictive value of administrative codes was 33.4{\%} at the fee-for-service plan and 30.1{\%} at the HMO plan (difference p = 0.26). The overall sensitivity of administrative codes was 91.7{\%} at the fee-for-service plan and 93.1{\%} at the HMO plan (difference p = 0.09). Positive predictive values were higher for inpatient records, while sensitivity was higher for outpatient records and for those with more advanced tumor stages at diagnosis. In conclusion, administrative records for identifying new cases of colorectal cancer in two large health plans showed poor positive predictive value but high sensitivity. Accuracy did not vary substantially by insurance plan. Researchers without tumor registry or other high-quality sources to verify records should not rely on administrative data alone from commercial health plans to identify incident colorectal cancer cases.",
keywords = "Administrative data, Cancer registry, Colorectal cancer, Positive predictive value, Sensitivity",
author = "Ramsey, {Scott D.} and Mandelson, {Margaret T.} and Ruth Etzioni and Robert Harrison and Robert Smith and Stephen Taplin",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10742-005-5562-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "27--37",
journal = "Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology",
issn = "1387-3741",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can administrative data identify incident cases of colorectal cancer? A comparison of two health plans

AU - Ramsey, Scott D.

AU - Mandelson, Margaret T.

AU - Etzioni, Ruth

AU - Harrison, Robert

AU - Smith, Robert

AU - Taplin, Stephen

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - Although commercial health insurance records are a potentially valuable source of data for cancer outcomes studies, the accuracy of administrative codes for identifying persons with cancer is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of administrative codes for identifying persons with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. The Washington state SEER cancer registry was linked with enrollment files from two large commercial health plans: a fee-for-service plan and a staff-model HMO with combined enrollment of more than 1.7 million. The accuracy of ICD-9 codes for colorectal cancer for enrollees diagnosed between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 1999 was compared for each plan, using SEER records as the "gold standard." The positive predictive value of administrative codes was 33.4% at the fee-for-service plan and 30.1% at the HMO plan (difference p = 0.26). The overall sensitivity of administrative codes was 91.7% at the fee-for-service plan and 93.1% at the HMO plan (difference p = 0.09). Positive predictive values were higher for inpatient records, while sensitivity was higher for outpatient records and for those with more advanced tumor stages at diagnosis. In conclusion, administrative records for identifying new cases of colorectal cancer in two large health plans showed poor positive predictive value but high sensitivity. Accuracy did not vary substantially by insurance plan. Researchers without tumor registry or other high-quality sources to verify records should not rely on administrative data alone from commercial health plans to identify incident colorectal cancer cases.

AB - Although commercial health insurance records are a potentially valuable source of data for cancer outcomes studies, the accuracy of administrative codes for identifying persons with cancer is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of administrative codes for identifying persons with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. The Washington state SEER cancer registry was linked with enrollment files from two large commercial health plans: a fee-for-service plan and a staff-model HMO with combined enrollment of more than 1.7 million. The accuracy of ICD-9 codes for colorectal cancer for enrollees diagnosed between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 1999 was compared for each plan, using SEER records as the "gold standard." The positive predictive value of administrative codes was 33.4% at the fee-for-service plan and 30.1% at the HMO plan (difference p = 0.26). The overall sensitivity of administrative codes was 91.7% at the fee-for-service plan and 93.1% at the HMO plan (difference p = 0.09). Positive predictive values were higher for inpatient records, while sensitivity was higher for outpatient records and for those with more advanced tumor stages at diagnosis. In conclusion, administrative records for identifying new cases of colorectal cancer in two large health plans showed poor positive predictive value but high sensitivity. Accuracy did not vary substantially by insurance plan. Researchers without tumor registry or other high-quality sources to verify records should not rely on administrative data alone from commercial health plans to identify incident colorectal cancer cases.

KW - Administrative data

KW - Cancer registry

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Positive predictive value

KW - Sensitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344469958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21344469958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10742-005-5562-0

DO - 10.1007/s10742-005-5562-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21344469958

VL - 5

SP - 27

EP - 37

JO - Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology

JF - Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology

SN - 1387-3741

IS - 1

ER -