Burn Surgeon and Palliative Care Physician Attitudes Regarding Goals of Care Delineation for Burned Geriatric Patients

Holly B. Cunningham, Shannon A. Scielzo, Paul A. Nakonezny, Brandon R. Bruns, Karen Brasel, Kenji Inaba, Scott C. Brakenridge, Jeffrey D. Kerby, Bellal A. Joseph, M. J. Mohler, Joseph Cuschieri, Mary E. Paulk, Akpofure P. Ekeh, Tarik D. Madni, Luis R. Taveras, Jonathan B. Imran, Steven E. Wolf, Herb A. Phelan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Palliative care specialists (PCS) and burn surgeons (BS) were surveyed regarding: 1) importance of goals of care (GoC) conversations for burned seniors; 2) confidence in their own specialty's ability to conduct these conversations; and 3) confidence in the ability of the other specialty to do so. A 13-item survey was developed by the steering committee of a multicenter consortium dedicated to palliative care in the injured geriatric patient and beta-tested by BS and PCS unaffiliated with the consortium. The finalized instrument was electronically circulated to active physician members of the American Burn Association and American Academy for Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Forty-five BS (7.3%) and 244 PCS (5.7%) responded. Palliative physicians rated being more familiar with GoC, were more comfortable having a discussion with laypeople, were more likely to have reported high-quality training in performing conversations, believed more palliative specialists were needed in intensive care units, and had more interest in conducting conversations relative to BS. Both groups believed themselves to perform GoC discussions better than the other specialty perceived them to do so. BS favored leading team discussions, whereas palliative specialists preferred jointly led discussions. Both groups agreed that discussions should occur within 72 hours of admission. Both groups believe themselves to conduct GoC discussions for burned seniors better than the other specialty perceived them to do so, which led to disparate views on perceptions for the optimal leadership of these discussions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1000-1005
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2018

Fingerprint

Patient Care Planning
Palliative Care
Geriatrics
Physicians
Aptitude
Hospices
Intensive Care Units
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Burn Surgeon and Palliative Care Physician Attitudes Regarding Goals of Care Delineation for Burned Geriatric Patients. / Cunningham, Holly B.; Scielzo, Shannon A.; Nakonezny, Paul A.; Bruns, Brandon R.; Brasel, Karen; Inaba, Kenji; Brakenridge, Scott C.; Kerby, Jeffrey D.; Joseph, Bellal A.; Mohler, M. J.; Cuschieri, Joseph; Paulk, Mary E.; Ekeh, Akpofure P.; Madni, Tarik D.; Taveras, Luis R.; Imran, Jonathan B.; Wolf, Steven E.; Phelan, Herb A.

In: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, Vol. 39, No. 6, 23.10.2018, p. 1000-1005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cunningham, HB, Scielzo, SA, Nakonezny, PA, Bruns, BR, Brasel, K, Inaba, K, Brakenridge, SC, Kerby, JD, Joseph, BA, Mohler, MJ, Cuschieri, J, Paulk, ME, Ekeh, AP, Madni, TD, Taveras, LR, Imran, JB, Wolf, SE & Phelan, HA 2018, 'Burn Surgeon and Palliative Care Physician Attitudes Regarding Goals of Care Delineation for Burned Geriatric Patients', Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1000-1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iry027
Cunningham, Holly B. ; Scielzo, Shannon A. ; Nakonezny, Paul A. ; Bruns, Brandon R. ; Brasel, Karen ; Inaba, Kenji ; Brakenridge, Scott C. ; Kerby, Jeffrey D. ; Joseph, Bellal A. ; Mohler, M. J. ; Cuschieri, Joseph ; Paulk, Mary E. ; Ekeh, Akpofure P. ; Madni, Tarik D. ; Taveras, Luis R. ; Imran, Jonathan B. ; Wolf, Steven E. ; Phelan, Herb A. / Burn Surgeon and Palliative Care Physician Attitudes Regarding Goals of Care Delineation for Burned Geriatric Patients. In: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 1000-1005.
@article{f0f259e03c1c44ef92f7a232635ef87a,
title = "Burn Surgeon and Palliative Care Physician Attitudes Regarding Goals of Care Delineation for Burned Geriatric Patients",
abstract = "Palliative care specialists (PCS) and burn surgeons (BS) were surveyed regarding: 1) importance of goals of care (GoC) conversations for burned seniors; 2) confidence in their own specialty's ability to conduct these conversations; and 3) confidence in the ability of the other specialty to do so. A 13-item survey was developed by the steering committee of a multicenter consortium dedicated to palliative care in the injured geriatric patient and beta-tested by BS and PCS unaffiliated with the consortium. The finalized instrument was electronically circulated to active physician members of the American Burn Association and American Academy for Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Forty-five BS (7.3{\%}) and 244 PCS (5.7{\%}) responded. Palliative physicians rated being more familiar with GoC, were more comfortable having a discussion with laypeople, were more likely to have reported high-quality training in performing conversations, believed more palliative specialists were needed in intensive care units, and had more interest in conducting conversations relative to BS. Both groups believed themselves to perform GoC discussions better than the other specialty perceived them to do so. BS favored leading team discussions, whereas palliative specialists preferred jointly led discussions. Both groups agreed that discussions should occur within 72 hours of admission. Both groups believe themselves to conduct GoC discussions for burned seniors better than the other specialty perceived them to do so, which led to disparate views on perceptions for the optimal leadership of these discussions.",
author = "Cunningham, {Holly B.} and Scielzo, {Shannon A.} and Nakonezny, {Paul A.} and Bruns, {Brandon R.} and Karen Brasel and Kenji Inaba and Brakenridge, {Scott C.} and Kerby, {Jeffrey D.} and Joseph, {Bellal A.} and Mohler, {M. J.} and Joseph Cuschieri and Paulk, {Mary E.} and Ekeh, {Akpofure P.} and Madni, {Tarik D.} and Taveras, {Luis R.} and Imran, {Jonathan B.} and Wolf, {Steven E.} and Phelan, {Herb A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1093/jbcr/iry027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1000--1005",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Burn Surgeon and Palliative Care Physician Attitudes Regarding Goals of Care Delineation for Burned Geriatric Patients

AU - Cunningham, Holly B.

AU - Scielzo, Shannon A.

AU - Nakonezny, Paul A.

AU - Bruns, Brandon R.

AU - Brasel, Karen

AU - Inaba, Kenji

AU - Brakenridge, Scott C.

AU - Kerby, Jeffrey D.

AU - Joseph, Bellal A.

AU - Mohler, M. J.

AU - Cuschieri, Joseph

AU - Paulk, Mary E.

AU - Ekeh, Akpofure P.

AU - Madni, Tarik D.

AU - Taveras, Luis R.

AU - Imran, Jonathan B.

AU - Wolf, Steven E.

AU - Phelan, Herb A.

PY - 2018/10/23

Y1 - 2018/10/23

N2 - Palliative care specialists (PCS) and burn surgeons (BS) were surveyed regarding: 1) importance of goals of care (GoC) conversations for burned seniors; 2) confidence in their own specialty's ability to conduct these conversations; and 3) confidence in the ability of the other specialty to do so. A 13-item survey was developed by the steering committee of a multicenter consortium dedicated to palliative care in the injured geriatric patient and beta-tested by BS and PCS unaffiliated with the consortium. The finalized instrument was electronically circulated to active physician members of the American Burn Association and American Academy for Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Forty-five BS (7.3%) and 244 PCS (5.7%) responded. Palliative physicians rated being more familiar with GoC, were more comfortable having a discussion with laypeople, were more likely to have reported high-quality training in performing conversations, believed more palliative specialists were needed in intensive care units, and had more interest in conducting conversations relative to BS. Both groups believed themselves to perform GoC discussions better than the other specialty perceived them to do so. BS favored leading team discussions, whereas palliative specialists preferred jointly led discussions. Both groups agreed that discussions should occur within 72 hours of admission. Both groups believe themselves to conduct GoC discussions for burned seniors better than the other specialty perceived them to do so, which led to disparate views on perceptions for the optimal leadership of these discussions.

AB - Palliative care specialists (PCS) and burn surgeons (BS) were surveyed regarding: 1) importance of goals of care (GoC) conversations for burned seniors; 2) confidence in their own specialty's ability to conduct these conversations; and 3) confidence in the ability of the other specialty to do so. A 13-item survey was developed by the steering committee of a multicenter consortium dedicated to palliative care in the injured geriatric patient and beta-tested by BS and PCS unaffiliated with the consortium. The finalized instrument was electronically circulated to active physician members of the American Burn Association and American Academy for Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Forty-five BS (7.3%) and 244 PCS (5.7%) responded. Palliative physicians rated being more familiar with GoC, were more comfortable having a discussion with laypeople, were more likely to have reported high-quality training in performing conversations, believed more palliative specialists were needed in intensive care units, and had more interest in conducting conversations relative to BS. Both groups believed themselves to perform GoC discussions better than the other specialty perceived them to do so. BS favored leading team discussions, whereas palliative specialists preferred jointly led discussions. Both groups agreed that discussions should occur within 72 hours of admission. Both groups believe themselves to conduct GoC discussions for burned seniors better than the other specialty perceived them to do so, which led to disparate views on perceptions for the optimal leadership of these discussions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055178195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055178195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jbcr/iry027

DO - 10.1093/jbcr/iry027

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1000

EP - 1005

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 6

ER -