TY - JOUR
T1 - Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research
AU - Warren, Nathaniel T.
AU - Gaudino, James A.
AU - Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja
AU - DIckerson, Kristin
AU - Robbins, Lynn
AU - Norman, Kathy
AU - Lind, John
AU - D'Amato, Sele
AU - Foley, Perry
AU - Gold, Rachel
AU - Bauer, Vance
AU - Fields, Scott A.
AU - Cohen, Deborah J.
AU - Clark, Khaya D.
AU - Devoe, Jennifer E.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the *OCHIN Inc.; †Oregon Health and Science University; ‡ADVANCE Patient Engagement Panel; and §Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR. Supported by the National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine (grant no. RC4 1001482); the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), PFA Cycle I Contract (2012), Health Systems; the Health Resources and Services Administration (grant no. UB2HA20235); and the Oregon Health & Science University Department of Family Medicine. This work was also supported through a PCORI Award (CDRN-1306–04716) for development of the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, known as PCORnet. All phases of this study were also supported by PCORI Award (308). All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the PCORI, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee or other participants in PCORnet. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Reprints: Nathaniel T. Warren, MPH, Department of Research, OCHIN Inc., 1881 SW Naito Parkway, Portland, OR 97201. E-mail: warrenn@ochin.org. Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Website, www.lww-medicalcare.com. Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc@. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. ISSN: 0025-7079/18/5610-0S58
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Background: Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement. Objective: We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings. Setting: The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation's largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states. Results: Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an "ambassador" program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts. Discussion: The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities.
AB - Background: Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement. Objective: We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings. Setting: The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation's largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states. Results: Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an "ambassador" program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts. Discussion: The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities.
KW - consumer engagement
KW - patient-centered outcomes research
KW - primary health care
KW - underserved populations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052833625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052833625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791
DO - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791
M3 - Article
C2 - 30074953
AN - SCOPUS:85052833625
SN - 0025-7079
VL - 56
SP - S58-S63
JO - Medical Care
JF - Medical Care
ER -