Building high-impact science: The dean as innovator

Kathleen M. Potempa, Virginia Tilden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

If funding level is accepted as an empirical referent of research productivity, the nursing profession's relatively low volume of funded research puts its capacity to influence practice and policy based on scientific evidence at a disadvantage. For the profession to effectively compete with other "high-impact," health-related disciplines, nursing leaders must find ways for a greater proportion of nursing faculty to excel as scientists, producing sufficient volume and quality of work in their careers to have a major influence on health care. In addition, if nursing leaders are to enhance nurses' interest in scientific development and use, the academic environment needs to foster greater connectivity of students at all levels of education with the scientific enterprise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-505
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Nursing Education
Volume43
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2004
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this