Building community partnerships

Case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand

Stephen F. Morin, Simon Morfit, Andre Maiorana, Apinun Aramrattana, Pedro Goicochea, John Michael Mutsambi, Jonathan Robbins, T. Anne Richards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Differences in resources, knowledge, and infrastructure between countries initiating and countries hosting HIV prevention research trials frequently yield ethical dilemmas. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have emerged as one strategy for establishing partnerships between researchers and host communities to promote community consultation in socially sensitive research. Purpose: To understand the evolution of CABs and community partnerships at international research sites conducting HIV prevention trials. Methods: Three research sites of the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) were selected to include geographical representation and diverse populations at risk for HIV/AIDS - in Lima, Peru; Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe; and Chiang Mai, Thailand. Data collection included review of secondary data, including academic publications and site-specific progress reports; observations at the research sites; face-to-face interviews with CAB members, research staff, and other key informants; and focus groups with study participants. Rapid assessment techniques were used for data analysis. Results: Two of the three CABs developed new strategies for community representation in response to new studies. All three CABs expanded their original function and became advocates for broader community interests beyond HIV prevention. The participation and input of community representatives, in response to critical incidents that occurred at the sites over the past five years, helped to solidify partnerships between researchers and communities. Limitations: Rapid Assessment is an exploratory methodology designed to provide an understanding of a situation based on the integration of multiple data sources, collected within a short period of time, without a formal examination of transcribed and coded data. Case studies, as a method, are meant to draw out what can be learned from a single case but are not, in the scientific sense, generalizable. Conclusions: In developing countries, CABs can be dynamic entities that enhance the HIV research process, assist in responding to issues involving research ethics, and prepare communities for HIV research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-156
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Trials
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 21 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Zimbabwe
Peru
Thailand
Research
HIV
Research Personnel
Research Ethics
Information Storage and Retrieval
Focus Groups
Developing Countries
Publications
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Referral and Consultation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Morin, S. F., Morfit, S., Maiorana, A., Aramrattana, A., Goicochea, P., Mutsambi, J. M., ... Richards, T. A. (2008). Building community partnerships: Case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand. Clinical Trials, 5(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774508090211

Building community partnerships : Case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand. / Morin, Stephen F.; Morfit, Simon; Maiorana, Andre; Aramrattana, Apinun; Goicochea, Pedro; Mutsambi, John Michael; Robbins, Jonathan; Richards, T. Anne.

In: Clinical Trials, Vol. 5, No. 2, 21.05.2008, p. 147-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morin, SF, Morfit, S, Maiorana, A, Aramrattana, A, Goicochea, P, Mutsambi, JM, Robbins, J & Richards, TA 2008, 'Building community partnerships: Case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand', Clinical Trials, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774508090211
Morin, Stephen F. ; Morfit, Simon ; Maiorana, Andre ; Aramrattana, Apinun ; Goicochea, Pedro ; Mutsambi, John Michael ; Robbins, Jonathan ; Richards, T. Anne. / Building community partnerships : Case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand. In: Clinical Trials. 2008 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 147-156.
@article{413a56dd09fa4eca9d9917c8960cb96b,
title = "Building community partnerships: Case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand",
abstract = "Background: Differences in resources, knowledge, and infrastructure between countries initiating and countries hosting HIV prevention research trials frequently yield ethical dilemmas. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have emerged as one strategy for establishing partnerships between researchers and host communities to promote community consultation in socially sensitive research. Purpose: To understand the evolution of CABs and community partnerships at international research sites conducting HIV prevention trials. Methods: Three research sites of the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) were selected to include geographical representation and diverse populations at risk for HIV/AIDS - in Lima, Peru; Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe; and Chiang Mai, Thailand. Data collection included review of secondary data, including academic publications and site-specific progress reports; observations at the research sites; face-to-face interviews with CAB members, research staff, and other key informants; and focus groups with study participants. Rapid assessment techniques were used for data analysis. Results: Two of the three CABs developed new strategies for community representation in response to new studies. All three CABs expanded their original function and became advocates for broader community interests beyond HIV prevention. The participation and input of community representatives, in response to critical incidents that occurred at the sites over the past five years, helped to solidify partnerships between researchers and communities. Limitations: Rapid Assessment is an exploratory methodology designed to provide an understanding of a situation based on the integration of multiple data sources, collected within a short period of time, without a formal examination of transcribed and coded data. Case studies, as a method, are meant to draw out what can be learned from a single case but are not, in the scientific sense, generalizable. Conclusions: In developing countries, CABs can be dynamic entities that enhance the HIV research process, assist in responding to issues involving research ethics, and prepare communities for HIV research.",
author = "Morin, {Stephen F.} and Simon Morfit and Andre Maiorana and Apinun Aramrattana and Pedro Goicochea and Mutsambi, {John Michael} and Jonathan Robbins and Richards, {T. Anne}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1177/1740774508090211",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "147--156",
journal = "Clinical Trials",
issn = "1740-7745",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building community partnerships

T2 - Case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand

AU - Morin, Stephen F.

AU - Morfit, Simon

AU - Maiorana, Andre

AU - Aramrattana, Apinun

AU - Goicochea, Pedro

AU - Mutsambi, John Michael

AU - Robbins, Jonathan

AU - Richards, T. Anne

PY - 2008/5/21

Y1 - 2008/5/21

N2 - Background: Differences in resources, knowledge, and infrastructure between countries initiating and countries hosting HIV prevention research trials frequently yield ethical dilemmas. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have emerged as one strategy for establishing partnerships between researchers and host communities to promote community consultation in socially sensitive research. Purpose: To understand the evolution of CABs and community partnerships at international research sites conducting HIV prevention trials. Methods: Three research sites of the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) were selected to include geographical representation and diverse populations at risk for HIV/AIDS - in Lima, Peru; Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe; and Chiang Mai, Thailand. Data collection included review of secondary data, including academic publications and site-specific progress reports; observations at the research sites; face-to-face interviews with CAB members, research staff, and other key informants; and focus groups with study participants. Rapid assessment techniques were used for data analysis. Results: Two of the three CABs developed new strategies for community representation in response to new studies. All three CABs expanded their original function and became advocates for broader community interests beyond HIV prevention. The participation and input of community representatives, in response to critical incidents that occurred at the sites over the past five years, helped to solidify partnerships between researchers and communities. Limitations: Rapid Assessment is an exploratory methodology designed to provide an understanding of a situation based on the integration of multiple data sources, collected within a short period of time, without a formal examination of transcribed and coded data. Case studies, as a method, are meant to draw out what can be learned from a single case but are not, in the scientific sense, generalizable. Conclusions: In developing countries, CABs can be dynamic entities that enhance the HIV research process, assist in responding to issues involving research ethics, and prepare communities for HIV research.

AB - Background: Differences in resources, knowledge, and infrastructure between countries initiating and countries hosting HIV prevention research trials frequently yield ethical dilemmas. Community Advisory Boards (CABs) have emerged as one strategy for establishing partnerships between researchers and host communities to promote community consultation in socially sensitive research. Purpose: To understand the evolution of CABs and community partnerships at international research sites conducting HIV prevention trials. Methods: Three research sites of the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) were selected to include geographical representation and diverse populations at risk for HIV/AIDS - in Lima, Peru; Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe; and Chiang Mai, Thailand. Data collection included review of secondary data, including academic publications and site-specific progress reports; observations at the research sites; face-to-face interviews with CAB members, research staff, and other key informants; and focus groups with study participants. Rapid assessment techniques were used for data analysis. Results: Two of the three CABs developed new strategies for community representation in response to new studies. All three CABs expanded their original function and became advocates for broader community interests beyond HIV prevention. The participation and input of community representatives, in response to critical incidents that occurred at the sites over the past five years, helped to solidify partnerships between researchers and communities. Limitations: Rapid Assessment is an exploratory methodology designed to provide an understanding of a situation based on the integration of multiple data sources, collected within a short period of time, without a formal examination of transcribed and coded data. Case studies, as a method, are meant to draw out what can be learned from a single case but are not, in the scientific sense, generalizable. Conclusions: In developing countries, CABs can be dynamic entities that enhance the HIV research process, assist in responding to issues involving research ethics, and prepare communities for HIV research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43649084406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43649084406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1740774508090211

DO - 10.1177/1740774508090211

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 147

EP - 156

JO - Clinical Trials

JF - Clinical Trials

SN - 1740-7745

IS - 2

ER -