Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) patients often fail to follow-up with referrals to outpatient clinics and physicians. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 2 ED discharge instructional methods on outpatient follow-up compliance and to evaluate sociodemographic characteristics as possible factors affecting outpatient follow-up compliance. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized trial of ED patients. At discharge, the intervention group had their follow-up appointment made and the standard group was given our hospital's referral service phone number to make their own follow-up appointment. MEASUREMENTS: Outpatient clinics were called 1 month after each subject's ED discharge to ascertain if they followed-up. Poisson regression was used to examine the effects of sociodemographic factors on follow-up compliance. RESULTS: Of 287 eligible subjects, 250 (87%) agreed to participate. Follow-up rates were 59% for the intervention group and 37% for the standard group (P
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 938-942 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of General Internal Medicine |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2005 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Emergency department
- Follow-up compliance
- Outpatient
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Internal Medicine
Cite this
Brief report : Factors affecting outpatient follow-up compliance of emergency department patients. / Kyriacou, Demetrios N.; Handel, Dan; Stein, Adam C.; Nelson, Regina R.
In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 10, 10.2005, p. 938-942.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Brief report
T2 - Factors affecting outpatient follow-up compliance of emergency department patients
AU - Kyriacou, Demetrios N.
AU - Handel, Dan
AU - Stein, Adam C.
AU - Nelson, Regina R.
PY - 2005/10
Y1 - 2005/10
N2 - BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) patients often fail to follow-up with referrals to outpatient clinics and physicians. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 2 ED discharge instructional methods on outpatient follow-up compliance and to evaluate sociodemographic characteristics as possible factors affecting outpatient follow-up compliance. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized trial of ED patients. At discharge, the intervention group had their follow-up appointment made and the standard group was given our hospital's referral service phone number to make their own follow-up appointment. MEASUREMENTS: Outpatient clinics were called 1 month after each subject's ED discharge to ascertain if they followed-up. Poisson regression was used to examine the effects of sociodemographic factors on follow-up compliance. RESULTS: Of 287 eligible subjects, 250 (87%) agreed to participate. Follow-up rates were 59% for the intervention group and 37% for the standard group (P
AB - BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) patients often fail to follow-up with referrals to outpatient clinics and physicians. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of 2 ED discharge instructional methods on outpatient follow-up compliance and to evaluate sociodemographic characteristics as possible factors affecting outpatient follow-up compliance. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized trial of ED patients. At discharge, the intervention group had their follow-up appointment made and the standard group was given our hospital's referral service phone number to make their own follow-up appointment. MEASUREMENTS: Outpatient clinics were called 1 month after each subject's ED discharge to ascertain if they followed-up. Poisson regression was used to examine the effects of sociodemographic factors on follow-up compliance. RESULTS: Of 287 eligible subjects, 250 (87%) agreed to participate. Follow-up rates were 59% for the intervention group and 37% for the standard group (P
KW - Emergency department
KW - Follow-up compliance
KW - Outpatient
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28444482802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28444482802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0216_1.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0216_1.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 16191142
AN - SCOPUS:28444482802
VL - 20
SP - 938
EP - 942
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
SN - 0884-8734
IS - 10
ER -