Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers

Nancy M. Petry, Jeremiah Weinstock, Benjamin Morasco, David M. Ledgerwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design Randomized trial. Setting College campuses. Participants A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1569-1578
Number of pages10
JournalAddiction
Volume104
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gambling
Students
Cognitive Therapy
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Brief interventions
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy
  • Gambling
  • Motivational enhancement therapy
  • Treatment efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. / Petry, Nancy M.; Weinstock, Jeremiah; Morasco, Benjamin; Ledgerwood, David M.

In: Addiction, Vol. 104, No. 9, 09.2009, p. 1569-1578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Petry, Nancy M. ; Weinstock, Jeremiah ; Morasco, Benjamin ; Ledgerwood, David M. / Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. In: Addiction. 2009 ; Vol. 104, No. 9. pp. 1569-1578.
@article{1034bf823b5247f8a70856cca033934d,
title = "Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers",
abstract = "Aims College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design Randomized trial. Setting College campuses. Participants A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.",
keywords = "Brief interventions, Cognitive-behavioral therapy, Gambling, Motivational enhancement therapy, Treatment efficacy",
author = "Petry, {Nancy M.} and Jeremiah Weinstock and Benjamin Morasco and Ledgerwood, {David M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "1569--1578",
journal = "Addiction",
issn = "0965-2140",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers

AU - Petry, Nancy M.

AU - Weinstock, Jeremiah

AU - Morasco, Benjamin

AU - Ledgerwood, David M.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Aims College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design Randomized trial. Setting College campuses. Participants A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.

AB - Aims College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design Randomized trial. Setting College campuses. Participants A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.

KW - Brief interventions

KW - Cognitive-behavioral therapy

KW - Gambling

KW - Motivational enhancement therapy

KW - Treatment efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68249106611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68249106611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 1569

EP - 1578

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

SN - 0965-2140

IS - 9

ER -