Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery

Gabriel M. Cohn, David Seifer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In light of continued reports suggesting the inadequacy of surgical gloves as sterile barriers, as well as an increasing number of reports describing intraoperative cross infections, a prospective study was performed comparing the presence of visible blood on the hands of surgeons wearing single or double gloves during 45 consecutive major obstetric and gynecologic operations. Single-gloved hands revealed the presence of visible blood in 38% of cases (n = 42) whereas visible blood was noted in only 2% of double-gloved hands (n = 48) (p <0.001). These results demonstrate that the sterile barrier between surgeon and patient was compromised intraoperatively and that particles the size of red blood cells were able to cross this barrier. In addition, these data suggest single gloving may be less than optimal in maintaining a sterile barrier, as well as strongly suggesting that double gloving can improve the integrity of the patient-surgeon sterile barrier during pelvic surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)715-717
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume162
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hand
Surgical Gloves
Cross Infection
Particle Size
Obstetrics
Erythrocytes
Prospective Studies
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Blood exposure
  • double gloving
  • pelvic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery. / Cohn, Gabriel M.; Seifer, David.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 162, No. 3, 1990, p. 715-717.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohn, Gabriel M. ; Seifer, David. / Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1990 ; Vol. 162, No. 3. pp. 715-717.
@article{0592dd18ed5045f5b846acc23b73c941,
title = "Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery",
abstract = "In light of continued reports suggesting the inadequacy of surgical gloves as sterile barriers, as well as an increasing number of reports describing intraoperative cross infections, a prospective study was performed comparing the presence of visible blood on the hands of surgeons wearing single or double gloves during 45 consecutive major obstetric and gynecologic operations. Single-gloved hands revealed the presence of visible blood in 38{\%} of cases (n = 42) whereas visible blood was noted in only 2{\%} of double-gloved hands (n = 48) (p <0.001). These results demonstrate that the sterile barrier between surgeon and patient was compromised intraoperatively and that particles the size of red blood cells were able to cross this barrier. In addition, these data suggest single gloving may be less than optimal in maintaining a sterile barrier, as well as strongly suggesting that double gloving can improve the integrity of the patient-surgeon sterile barrier during pelvic surgery.",
keywords = "Blood exposure, double gloving, pelvic surgery",
author = "Cohn, {Gabriel M.} and David Seifer",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9378(90)90992-G",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "162",
pages = "715--717",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery

AU - Cohn, Gabriel M.

AU - Seifer, David

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - In light of continued reports suggesting the inadequacy of surgical gloves as sterile barriers, as well as an increasing number of reports describing intraoperative cross infections, a prospective study was performed comparing the presence of visible blood on the hands of surgeons wearing single or double gloves during 45 consecutive major obstetric and gynecologic operations. Single-gloved hands revealed the presence of visible blood in 38% of cases (n = 42) whereas visible blood was noted in only 2% of double-gloved hands (n = 48) (p <0.001). These results demonstrate that the sterile barrier between surgeon and patient was compromised intraoperatively and that particles the size of red blood cells were able to cross this barrier. In addition, these data suggest single gloving may be less than optimal in maintaining a sterile barrier, as well as strongly suggesting that double gloving can improve the integrity of the patient-surgeon sterile barrier during pelvic surgery.

AB - In light of continued reports suggesting the inadequacy of surgical gloves as sterile barriers, as well as an increasing number of reports describing intraoperative cross infections, a prospective study was performed comparing the presence of visible blood on the hands of surgeons wearing single or double gloves during 45 consecutive major obstetric and gynecologic operations. Single-gloved hands revealed the presence of visible blood in 38% of cases (n = 42) whereas visible blood was noted in only 2% of double-gloved hands (n = 48) (p <0.001). These results demonstrate that the sterile barrier between surgeon and patient was compromised intraoperatively and that particles the size of red blood cells were able to cross this barrier. In addition, these data suggest single gloving may be less than optimal in maintaining a sterile barrier, as well as strongly suggesting that double gloving can improve the integrity of the patient-surgeon sterile barrier during pelvic surgery.

KW - Blood exposure

KW - double gloving

KW - pelvic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025257174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025257174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90992-G

DO - 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90992-G

M3 - Article

VL - 162

SP - 715

EP - 717

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 3

ER -