Biomechanical testing of a novel, minimally invasive rib fracture plating system

J. Rafe Sales, Thomas J. Ellis, Joel Gillard, Qi Liu, Joyce C. Chen, Lyle (Bruce) Ham, John C. Mayberry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A novel rib fracture repair plating system was developed to provide durable fixation with a shorter length than standard systems and thus facilitate minimally invasive repair. We hypothesized that U-plate fixation would be at least equivalent in durability to standard anterior fixation. STUDY: Twenty fresh frozen ribs (10 pairs) from two human cadavers were first tested for intact stiffness (force or deformation). A gap of 5 mm was then created in the middle of each rib with a saw. Each rib was reconstructed with either the U-plate (4.6 cm length, Acute Innovations, LLC, Hillsboro, OR) with four screws or a 2.4-mm anterior locking plate (9.5 cm length, Synthes, Paoli, PA) with six screws. The U-plates were placed on one rib and the anterior plates on the contralateral rib of the paired levels. The reconstructed ribs were cycled 50,000 times with a load of ±2N at 1 Hz in a simulation of the repetitive loading of deep breathing. The stiffness of the construct was measured throughout the test. RESULTS: Stiffness decreased from the intact rib to the transected/plated rib for both types of fixation; however, a significant decrease in stiffness was observed only with the anterior repair (p = 0.03). After 50,000 cycles, the U-plated ribs lost 0.12 ± 0.03 N/mm (1.9%) stiffness, whereas the anterior-plated ribs lost 0.72 ± 0.13 N/mm (9.9%) stiffness (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this simulation of an unstable rib fracture with a small bony gap, U-plate fixation was more durable than standard anterior fixation. The greatly diminished size of the U-plate compared with the standard may facilitate minimally invasive rib fracture repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1270-1274
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Rib Fractures
Ribs
Cadaver
Respiration

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Flail chest
  • Operative reduction/internal fixation
  • Rib fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Biomechanical testing of a novel, minimally invasive rib fracture plating system. / Sales, J. Rafe; Ellis, Thomas J.; Gillard, Joel; Liu, Qi; Chen, Joyce C.; Ham, Lyle (Bruce); Mayberry, John C.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 64, No. 5, 05.2008, p. 1270-1274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sales, J. Rafe ; Ellis, Thomas J. ; Gillard, Joel ; Liu, Qi ; Chen, Joyce C. ; Ham, Lyle (Bruce) ; Mayberry, John C. / Biomechanical testing of a novel, minimally invasive rib fracture plating system. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2008 ; Vol. 64, No. 5. pp. 1270-1274.
@article{9c897144e5f94b68b54a7607755e1ca0,
title = "Biomechanical testing of a novel, minimally invasive rib fracture plating system",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: A novel rib fracture repair plating system was developed to provide durable fixation with a shorter length than standard systems and thus facilitate minimally invasive repair. We hypothesized that U-plate fixation would be at least equivalent in durability to standard anterior fixation. STUDY: Twenty fresh frozen ribs (10 pairs) from two human cadavers were first tested for intact stiffness (force or deformation). A gap of 5 mm was then created in the middle of each rib with a saw. Each rib was reconstructed with either the U-plate (4.6 cm length, Acute Innovations, LLC, Hillsboro, OR) with four screws or a 2.4-mm anterior locking plate (9.5 cm length, Synthes, Paoli, PA) with six screws. The U-plates were placed on one rib and the anterior plates on the contralateral rib of the paired levels. The reconstructed ribs were cycled 50,000 times with a load of ±2N at 1 Hz in a simulation of the repetitive loading of deep breathing. The stiffness of the construct was measured throughout the test. RESULTS: Stiffness decreased from the intact rib to the transected/plated rib for both types of fixation; however, a significant decrease in stiffness was observed only with the anterior repair (p = 0.03). After 50,000 cycles, the U-plated ribs lost 0.12 ± 0.03 N/mm (1.9{\%}) stiffness, whereas the anterior-plated ribs lost 0.72 ± 0.13 N/mm (9.9{\%}) stiffness (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this simulation of an unstable rib fracture with a small bony gap, U-plate fixation was more durable than standard anterior fixation. The greatly diminished size of the U-plate compared with the standard may facilitate minimally invasive rib fracture repair.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Flail chest, Operative reduction/internal fixation, Rib fracture",
author = "Sales, {J. Rafe} and Ellis, {Thomas J.} and Joel Gillard and Qi Liu and Chen, {Joyce C.} and Ham, {Lyle (Bruce)} and Mayberry, {John C.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e31804a7fd5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "1270--1274",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical testing of a novel, minimally invasive rib fracture plating system

AU - Sales, J. Rafe

AU - Ellis, Thomas J.

AU - Gillard, Joel

AU - Liu, Qi

AU - Chen, Joyce C.

AU - Ham, Lyle (Bruce)

AU - Mayberry, John C.

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: A novel rib fracture repair plating system was developed to provide durable fixation with a shorter length than standard systems and thus facilitate minimally invasive repair. We hypothesized that U-plate fixation would be at least equivalent in durability to standard anterior fixation. STUDY: Twenty fresh frozen ribs (10 pairs) from two human cadavers were first tested for intact stiffness (force or deformation). A gap of 5 mm was then created in the middle of each rib with a saw. Each rib was reconstructed with either the U-plate (4.6 cm length, Acute Innovations, LLC, Hillsboro, OR) with four screws or a 2.4-mm anterior locking plate (9.5 cm length, Synthes, Paoli, PA) with six screws. The U-plates were placed on one rib and the anterior plates on the contralateral rib of the paired levels. The reconstructed ribs were cycled 50,000 times with a load of ±2N at 1 Hz in a simulation of the repetitive loading of deep breathing. The stiffness of the construct was measured throughout the test. RESULTS: Stiffness decreased from the intact rib to the transected/plated rib for both types of fixation; however, a significant decrease in stiffness was observed only with the anterior repair (p = 0.03). After 50,000 cycles, the U-plated ribs lost 0.12 ± 0.03 N/mm (1.9%) stiffness, whereas the anterior-plated ribs lost 0.72 ± 0.13 N/mm (9.9%) stiffness (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this simulation of an unstable rib fracture with a small bony gap, U-plate fixation was more durable than standard anterior fixation. The greatly diminished size of the U-plate compared with the standard may facilitate minimally invasive rib fracture repair.

AB - BACKGROUND: A novel rib fracture repair plating system was developed to provide durable fixation with a shorter length than standard systems and thus facilitate minimally invasive repair. We hypothesized that U-plate fixation would be at least equivalent in durability to standard anterior fixation. STUDY: Twenty fresh frozen ribs (10 pairs) from two human cadavers were first tested for intact stiffness (force or deformation). A gap of 5 mm was then created in the middle of each rib with a saw. Each rib was reconstructed with either the U-plate (4.6 cm length, Acute Innovations, LLC, Hillsboro, OR) with four screws or a 2.4-mm anterior locking plate (9.5 cm length, Synthes, Paoli, PA) with six screws. The U-plates were placed on one rib and the anterior plates on the contralateral rib of the paired levels. The reconstructed ribs were cycled 50,000 times with a load of ±2N at 1 Hz in a simulation of the repetitive loading of deep breathing. The stiffness of the construct was measured throughout the test. RESULTS: Stiffness decreased from the intact rib to the transected/plated rib for both types of fixation; however, a significant decrease in stiffness was observed only with the anterior repair (p = 0.03). After 50,000 cycles, the U-plated ribs lost 0.12 ± 0.03 N/mm (1.9%) stiffness, whereas the anterior-plated ribs lost 0.72 ± 0.13 N/mm (9.9%) stiffness (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this simulation of an unstable rib fracture with a small bony gap, U-plate fixation was more durable than standard anterior fixation. The greatly diminished size of the U-plate compared with the standard may facilitate minimally invasive rib fracture repair.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Flail chest

KW - Operative reduction/internal fixation

KW - Rib fracture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43449085822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43449085822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31804a7fd5

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31804a7fd5

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 1270

EP - 1274

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -