Bibliometric Analysis of Radiation Oncology Departmental Scholarly Publication Productivity at Domestic Residency Training Institutions

Clifton D. Fuller, Mehee Choi, Charles Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Corporate scientific activity lies at the heart of the modern academic institution, and yet field-specific estimates of institutional or departmental scholarly productivity are difficult to assess. The authors sought to estimate long-term and current departmental research efforts at residency-sponsoring US radiation oncology departments, using modifications of established bibliometric indices. Methods: Bibliometric citation database searches were performed for all residency-affiliated academic radiation oncology departments and their component physician radiation oncology faculty members. Metrics based on publication, citation, and the Hirsch index (h-index) were calculated, and departments were ranked by departmental productivity from 1996 to 2007, as well as by current mean faculty bibliometric output. Results: Seventy-eight academic radiation oncology departments and their component 826 radiation oncologist faculty members were analyzed bibliometrically. The average number of publications per department from 1996 to 2007 was 363.8, with a mean of 8,116.0 citations and a mean institutional h-index of 37.2. Departments at academic institutions demonstrated a grand mean of 41.0 publications, 709.0 citations, and an h-index of 7.6 as of fall 2007. A larger number of physician faculty members (>12) was associated with increased scholarly activity. Conclusions: The use of quantitative metrics provides departments and researchers with a mechanism to evaluate collective scientific productivity and serves as an impetus for improved performance across the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-118
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Bibliometrics
Radiation Oncology
Internship and Residency
Publications
Physicians
Research Personnel
Databases
Research

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • citations
  • h-index
  • radiation oncology
  • residency programs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{203d1c89362943c98f26ae3fc2ac1f16,
title = "Bibliometric Analysis of Radiation Oncology Departmental Scholarly Publication Productivity at Domestic Residency Training Institutions",
abstract = "Purpose: Corporate scientific activity lies at the heart of the modern academic institution, and yet field-specific estimates of institutional or departmental scholarly productivity are difficult to assess. The authors sought to estimate long-term and current departmental research efforts at residency-sponsoring US radiation oncology departments, using modifications of established bibliometric indices. Methods: Bibliometric citation database searches were performed for all residency-affiliated academic radiation oncology departments and their component physician radiation oncology faculty members. Metrics based on publication, citation, and the Hirsch index (h-index) were calculated, and departments were ranked by departmental productivity from 1996 to 2007, as well as by current mean faculty bibliometric output. Results: Seventy-eight academic radiation oncology departments and their component 826 radiation oncologist faculty members were analyzed bibliometrically. The average number of publications per department from 1996 to 2007 was 363.8, with a mean of 8,116.0 citations and a mean institutional h-index of 37.2. Departments at academic institutions demonstrated a grand mean of 41.0 publications, 709.0 citations, and an h-index of 7.6 as of fall 2007. A larger number of physician faculty members (>12) was associated with increased scholarly activity. Conclusions: The use of quantitative metrics provides departments and researchers with a mechanism to evaluate collective scientific productivity and serves as an impetus for improved performance across the field.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, citations, h-index, radiation oncology, residency programs",
author = "Fuller, {Clifton D.} and Mehee Choi and Charles Thomas",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2008.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "112--118",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bibliometric Analysis of Radiation Oncology Departmental Scholarly Publication Productivity at Domestic Residency Training Institutions

AU - Fuller, Clifton D.

AU - Choi, Mehee

AU - Thomas, Charles

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose: Corporate scientific activity lies at the heart of the modern academic institution, and yet field-specific estimates of institutional or departmental scholarly productivity are difficult to assess. The authors sought to estimate long-term and current departmental research efforts at residency-sponsoring US radiation oncology departments, using modifications of established bibliometric indices. Methods: Bibliometric citation database searches were performed for all residency-affiliated academic radiation oncology departments and their component physician radiation oncology faculty members. Metrics based on publication, citation, and the Hirsch index (h-index) were calculated, and departments were ranked by departmental productivity from 1996 to 2007, as well as by current mean faculty bibliometric output. Results: Seventy-eight academic radiation oncology departments and their component 826 radiation oncologist faculty members were analyzed bibliometrically. The average number of publications per department from 1996 to 2007 was 363.8, with a mean of 8,116.0 citations and a mean institutional h-index of 37.2. Departments at academic institutions demonstrated a grand mean of 41.0 publications, 709.0 citations, and an h-index of 7.6 as of fall 2007. A larger number of physician faculty members (>12) was associated with increased scholarly activity. Conclusions: The use of quantitative metrics provides departments and researchers with a mechanism to evaluate collective scientific productivity and serves as an impetus for improved performance across the field.

AB - Purpose: Corporate scientific activity lies at the heart of the modern academic institution, and yet field-specific estimates of institutional or departmental scholarly productivity are difficult to assess. The authors sought to estimate long-term and current departmental research efforts at residency-sponsoring US radiation oncology departments, using modifications of established bibliometric indices. Methods: Bibliometric citation database searches were performed for all residency-affiliated academic radiation oncology departments and their component physician radiation oncology faculty members. Metrics based on publication, citation, and the Hirsch index (h-index) were calculated, and departments were ranked by departmental productivity from 1996 to 2007, as well as by current mean faculty bibliometric output. Results: Seventy-eight academic radiation oncology departments and their component 826 radiation oncologist faculty members were analyzed bibliometrically. The average number of publications per department from 1996 to 2007 was 363.8, with a mean of 8,116.0 citations and a mean institutional h-index of 37.2. Departments at academic institutions demonstrated a grand mean of 41.0 publications, 709.0 citations, and an h-index of 7.6 as of fall 2007. A larger number of physician faculty members (>12) was associated with increased scholarly activity. Conclusions: The use of quantitative metrics provides departments and researchers with a mechanism to evaluate collective scientific productivity and serves as an impetus for improved performance across the field.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - citations

KW - h-index

KW - radiation oncology

KW - residency programs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58549099713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58549099713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.07.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 19179240

AN - SCOPUS:58549099713

VL - 6

SP - 112

EP - 118

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 2

ER -