Beyond organic and fair trade? An analysis of ecolabel preferences in the United States

Philip H. Howard, Patricia Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The success of alternative food initiatives indicates increasing interest in changing the way food is produced, processed, and sold. Ecolabels such as organic and Fair Trade have entered the mainstream marketplace, and other voluntary identifiers on products are emerging to address criteria not included in these successful initiatives. Little is known about consumer interests in these criteria, however. To anticipate the direction of food-system changes, as well as assist food producers to meet consumer demands, we conducted a national mail survey to assess preferences for criteria that go "beyond" (or could complement) organic and Fair Trade. We utilized a forced-choice paired-comparisons question format to rank five possibilities (humane, local, living wage, small-scale, U.S. grown) that might feasibly be implemented by food producers. Local was the most popular choice, although humane also received a high level of support. Multilevel logistic regression indicated that local was preferred by rural residents, and that humane was preferred by frequent organic consumers and high-income households. Survey respondents also chose product labels more frequently than other potential sources of information about their food. Preferences for local and humane ecolabel criteria should be placed in perspective, as consumers expressed much higher levels of interest in the more individualized concerns of safety and nutrition. The results suggest, however, that consumers are interested in a food system that addresses broader political and ethical values, which has implications for production, marketing, and movement building for sustainable food systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-269
Number of pages26
JournalRural Sociology
Volume75
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

food
producer
consumer interest
system change
mail survey
household income
source of information
nutrition
wage
marketing
logistics
resident
regression
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Beyond organic and fair trade? An analysis of ecolabel preferences in the United States. / Howard, Philip H.; Allen, Patricia.

In: Rural Sociology, Vol. 75, No. 2, 01.06.2010, p. 244-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d03aee36e88a4e119fccee267293d1a6,
title = "Beyond organic and fair trade? An analysis of ecolabel preferences in the United States",
abstract = "The success of alternative food initiatives indicates increasing interest in changing the way food is produced, processed, and sold. Ecolabels such as organic and Fair Trade have entered the mainstream marketplace, and other voluntary identifiers on products are emerging to address criteria not included in these successful initiatives. Little is known about consumer interests in these criteria, however. To anticipate the direction of food-system changes, as well as assist food producers to meet consumer demands, we conducted a national mail survey to assess preferences for criteria that go {"}beyond{"} (or could complement) organic and Fair Trade. We utilized a forced-choice paired-comparisons question format to rank five possibilities (humane, local, living wage, small-scale, U.S. grown) that might feasibly be implemented by food producers. Local was the most popular choice, although humane also received a high level of support. Multilevel logistic regression indicated that local was preferred by rural residents, and that humane was preferred by frequent organic consumers and high-income households. Survey respondents also chose product labels more frequently than other potential sources of information about their food. Preferences for local and humane ecolabel criteria should be placed in perspective, as consumers expressed much higher levels of interest in the more individualized concerns of safety and nutrition. The results suggest, however, that consumers are interested in a food system that addresses broader political and ethical values, which has implications for production, marketing, and movement building for sustainable food systems.",
author = "Howard, {Philip H.} and Patricia Allen",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00009.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "244--269",
journal = "Rural Sociology",
issn = "0036-0112",
publisher = "Rural Sociological Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond organic and fair trade? An analysis of ecolabel preferences in the United States

AU - Howard, Philip H.

AU - Allen, Patricia

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - The success of alternative food initiatives indicates increasing interest in changing the way food is produced, processed, and sold. Ecolabels such as organic and Fair Trade have entered the mainstream marketplace, and other voluntary identifiers on products are emerging to address criteria not included in these successful initiatives. Little is known about consumer interests in these criteria, however. To anticipate the direction of food-system changes, as well as assist food producers to meet consumer demands, we conducted a national mail survey to assess preferences for criteria that go "beyond" (or could complement) organic and Fair Trade. We utilized a forced-choice paired-comparisons question format to rank five possibilities (humane, local, living wage, small-scale, U.S. grown) that might feasibly be implemented by food producers. Local was the most popular choice, although humane also received a high level of support. Multilevel logistic regression indicated that local was preferred by rural residents, and that humane was preferred by frequent organic consumers and high-income households. Survey respondents also chose product labels more frequently than other potential sources of information about their food. Preferences for local and humane ecolabel criteria should be placed in perspective, as consumers expressed much higher levels of interest in the more individualized concerns of safety and nutrition. The results suggest, however, that consumers are interested in a food system that addresses broader political and ethical values, which has implications for production, marketing, and movement building for sustainable food systems.

AB - The success of alternative food initiatives indicates increasing interest in changing the way food is produced, processed, and sold. Ecolabels such as organic and Fair Trade have entered the mainstream marketplace, and other voluntary identifiers on products are emerging to address criteria not included in these successful initiatives. Little is known about consumer interests in these criteria, however. To anticipate the direction of food-system changes, as well as assist food producers to meet consumer demands, we conducted a national mail survey to assess preferences for criteria that go "beyond" (or could complement) organic and Fair Trade. We utilized a forced-choice paired-comparisons question format to rank five possibilities (humane, local, living wage, small-scale, U.S. grown) that might feasibly be implemented by food producers. Local was the most popular choice, although humane also received a high level of support. Multilevel logistic regression indicated that local was preferred by rural residents, and that humane was preferred by frequent organic consumers and high-income households. Survey respondents also chose product labels more frequently than other potential sources of information about their food. Preferences for local and humane ecolabel criteria should be placed in perspective, as consumers expressed much higher levels of interest in the more individualized concerns of safety and nutrition. The results suggest, however, that consumers are interested in a food system that addresses broader political and ethical values, which has implications for production, marketing, and movement building for sustainable food systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954661555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954661555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00009.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00009.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954661555

VL - 75

SP - 244

EP - 269

JO - Rural Sociology

JF - Rural Sociology

SN - 0036-0112

IS - 2

ER -