Beyond doughnuts: Tumor board recommendations influence patient care

John K. Petty, John Vetto

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    56 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background. There is little solid evidence to support the belief that tumor conferences directly impact the care patients receive. This study investigated the recommendations made at tumor conferences and whether these recommendations were enacted. Methods. Cancer registrars from Oregon-area hospitals with tumor boards that utilized a prospective "working" format were surveyed regarding tumor board characteristics and content. They also recorded the recommendations made for each prospective case presented at each tumor board for one month. Later, they contacted each patient's provider to see which recommendations had been implemented. Results. Information from eight tumor boards in six hospitals was recorded. The institutions varied with regard to size, location, number of tumor boards, number of cases reviewed annually, and types of cancers reviewed. One hundred fifty-three specific, prospective recommendations were made for the care of 97 patients. Of these, 128 (84%) were followed, 2 (1%) were pending, and 5 (3%) were status unknown. Of recommendations followed, 21 (16%) were for diagnosis, 100 (78%) were for therapy, and 7 (5%) were for palliation. Conclusion. Recommendations made at tumor conferences are generally implemented into patient care. Tumor boards can play a strategic role in the planning of care for cancer patients.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)97-100
    Number of pages4
    JournalJournal of Cancer Education
    Volume17
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    Patient Care
    Neoplasms
    Patient Care Planning

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this

    Beyond doughnuts : Tumor board recommendations influence patient care. / Petty, John K.; Vetto, John.

    In: Journal of Cancer Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2002, p. 97-100.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{4a527aa82b624c5cb4eebc8c62f68cf0,
    title = "Beyond doughnuts: Tumor board recommendations influence patient care",
    abstract = "Background. There is little solid evidence to support the belief that tumor conferences directly impact the care patients receive. This study investigated the recommendations made at tumor conferences and whether these recommendations were enacted. Methods. Cancer registrars from Oregon-area hospitals with tumor boards that utilized a prospective {"}working{"} format were surveyed regarding tumor board characteristics and content. They also recorded the recommendations made for each prospective case presented at each tumor board for one month. Later, they contacted each patient's provider to see which recommendations had been implemented. Results. Information from eight tumor boards in six hospitals was recorded. The institutions varied with regard to size, location, number of tumor boards, number of cases reviewed annually, and types of cancers reviewed. One hundred fifty-three specific, prospective recommendations were made for the care of 97 patients. Of these, 128 (84{\%}) were followed, 2 (1{\%}) were pending, and 5 (3{\%}) were status unknown. Of recommendations followed, 21 (16{\%}) were for diagnosis, 100 (78{\%}) were for therapy, and 7 (5{\%}) were for palliation. Conclusion. Recommendations made at tumor conferences are generally implemented into patient care. Tumor boards can play a strategic role in the planning of care for cancer patients.",
    author = "Petty, {John K.} and John Vetto",
    year = "2002",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "97--100",
    journal = "Journal of Cancer Education",
    issn = "0885-8195",
    publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Beyond doughnuts

    T2 - Tumor board recommendations influence patient care

    AU - Petty, John K.

    AU - Vetto, John

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - Background. There is little solid evidence to support the belief that tumor conferences directly impact the care patients receive. This study investigated the recommendations made at tumor conferences and whether these recommendations were enacted. Methods. Cancer registrars from Oregon-area hospitals with tumor boards that utilized a prospective "working" format were surveyed regarding tumor board characteristics and content. They also recorded the recommendations made for each prospective case presented at each tumor board for one month. Later, they contacted each patient's provider to see which recommendations had been implemented. Results. Information from eight tumor boards in six hospitals was recorded. The institutions varied with regard to size, location, number of tumor boards, number of cases reviewed annually, and types of cancers reviewed. One hundred fifty-three specific, prospective recommendations were made for the care of 97 patients. Of these, 128 (84%) were followed, 2 (1%) were pending, and 5 (3%) were status unknown. Of recommendations followed, 21 (16%) were for diagnosis, 100 (78%) were for therapy, and 7 (5%) were for palliation. Conclusion. Recommendations made at tumor conferences are generally implemented into patient care. Tumor boards can play a strategic role in the planning of care for cancer patients.

    AB - Background. There is little solid evidence to support the belief that tumor conferences directly impact the care patients receive. This study investigated the recommendations made at tumor conferences and whether these recommendations were enacted. Methods. Cancer registrars from Oregon-area hospitals with tumor boards that utilized a prospective "working" format were surveyed regarding tumor board characteristics and content. They also recorded the recommendations made for each prospective case presented at each tumor board for one month. Later, they contacted each patient's provider to see which recommendations had been implemented. Results. Information from eight tumor boards in six hospitals was recorded. The institutions varied with regard to size, location, number of tumor boards, number of cases reviewed annually, and types of cancers reviewed. One hundred fifty-three specific, prospective recommendations were made for the care of 97 patients. Of these, 128 (84%) were followed, 2 (1%) were pending, and 5 (3%) were status unknown. Of recommendations followed, 21 (16%) were for diagnosis, 100 (78%) were for therapy, and 7 (5%) were for palliation. Conclusion. Recommendations made at tumor conferences are generally implemented into patient care. Tumor boards can play a strategic role in the planning of care for cancer patients.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035990936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035990936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 12092861

    AN - SCOPUS:0035990936

    VL - 17

    SP - 97

    EP - 100

    JO - Journal of Cancer Education

    JF - Journal of Cancer Education

    SN - 0885-8195

    IS - 2

    ER -