Beware of predatory journals: A caution from editors of three family medicine journals

Marjorie A. Bowman, John Saultz, William R. Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We all share responsibility for addressing the threats of predatory publishing. Authors can avoid submitting work to such journals, even if promised sure acceptance and prompt publication. Readers can be vigilant when assessing the sources of published reports. Journal editors can check submitted manuscripts for duplicate publication, refuse to consider work already published in predatory journals, and carefully review article references before publication. Reviewers should be suspicious of requests from unfamiliar journals and refuse involvement with predatory journals and publishers. Professional organizations that sponsor journals can renew their commitments to quality, control, and access. Investigators can write grant budgets to include processing fees for publication in reputable journals. Academic institutions can restructure their criteria for academic advancement to favor quality over quantity of scholarly publications. What is at stake is the soundness of our science, the quality of our scholarly literature, and the public’s trust in our work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)671-676
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Medicine
Publications
Duplicate Publication
Fees and Charges
Manuscripts
Organized Financing
Budgets
Quality Control
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Beware of predatory journals : A caution from editors of three family medicine journals. / Bowman, Marjorie A.; Saultz, John; Phillips, William R.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.09.2018, p. 671-676.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{4de1daa4d8c24168a8063cef30515bbc,
title = "Beware of predatory journals: A caution from editors of three family medicine journals",
abstract = "We all share responsibility for addressing the threats of predatory publishing. Authors can avoid submitting work to such journals, even if promised sure acceptance and prompt publication. Readers can be vigilant when assessing the sources of published reports. Journal editors can check submitted manuscripts for duplicate publication, refuse to consider work already published in predatory journals, and carefully review article references before publication. Reviewers should be suspicious of requests from unfamiliar journals and refuse involvement with predatory journals and publishers. Professional organizations that sponsor journals can renew their commitments to quality, control, and access. Investigators can write grant budgets to include processing fees for publication in reputable journals. Academic institutions can restructure their criteria for academic advancement to favor quality over quantity of scholarly publications. What is at stake is the soundness of our science, the quality of our scholarly literature, and the public’s trust in our work.",
author = "Bowman, {Marjorie A.} and John Saultz and Phillips, {William R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.180197",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "671--676",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beware of predatory journals

T2 - A caution from editors of three family medicine journals

AU - Bowman, Marjorie A.

AU - Saultz, John

AU - Phillips, William R.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - We all share responsibility for addressing the threats of predatory publishing. Authors can avoid submitting work to such journals, even if promised sure acceptance and prompt publication. Readers can be vigilant when assessing the sources of published reports. Journal editors can check submitted manuscripts for duplicate publication, refuse to consider work already published in predatory journals, and carefully review article references before publication. Reviewers should be suspicious of requests from unfamiliar journals and refuse involvement with predatory journals and publishers. Professional organizations that sponsor journals can renew their commitments to quality, control, and access. Investigators can write grant budgets to include processing fees for publication in reputable journals. Academic institutions can restructure their criteria for academic advancement to favor quality over quantity of scholarly publications. What is at stake is the soundness of our science, the quality of our scholarly literature, and the public’s trust in our work.

AB - We all share responsibility for addressing the threats of predatory publishing. Authors can avoid submitting work to such journals, even if promised sure acceptance and prompt publication. Readers can be vigilant when assessing the sources of published reports. Journal editors can check submitted manuscripts for duplicate publication, refuse to consider work already published in predatory journals, and carefully review article references before publication. Reviewers should be suspicious of requests from unfamiliar journals and refuse involvement with predatory journals and publishers. Professional organizations that sponsor journals can renew their commitments to quality, control, and access. Investigators can write grant budgets to include processing fees for publication in reputable journals. Academic institutions can restructure their criteria for academic advancement to favor quality over quantity of scholarly publications. What is at stake is the soundness of our science, the quality of our scholarly literature, and the public’s trust in our work.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053276078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053276078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.180197

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.180197

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85053276078

VL - 31

SP - 671

EP - 676

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 5

ER -