"best case/worst case"

Qualitative evaluation of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decisions

Jacqueline M. Kruser, Michael J. Nabozny, Nicole M. Steffens, Karen Brasel, Toby C. Campbell, Martha E. Gaines, Margaret L. Schwarze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate a communication tool called "Best Case/Worst Case" (BC/WC) based on an established conceptual model of shared decision-making. Design Focus group study. Setting Older adults (four focus groups) and surgeons (two focus groups) using modified questions from the Decision Aid Acceptability Scale and the Decisional Conflict Scale to evaluate and revise the communication tool. Participants Individuals aged 60 and older recruited from senior centers (n = 37) and surgeons from academic and private practices in Wisconsin (n = 17). Measurements Qualitative content analysis was used to explore themes and concepts that focus group respondents identified. Results Seniors and surgeons praised the tool for the unambiguous illustration of multiple treatment options and the clarity gained from presentation of an array of treatment outcomes. Participants noted that the tool provides an opportunity for in-the-moment, preference-based deliberation about options and a platform for further discussion with other clinicians and loved ones. Older adults worried that the format of the tool was not universally accessible for people with different educational backgrounds, and surgeons had concerns that the tool was vulnerable to physicians' subjective biases. Conclusion The BC/WC tool is a novel decision support intervention that may help facilitate difficult decision-making for older adults and their physicians when considering invasive, acute medical treatments such as surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1805-1811
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume63
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
Communication
Decision Making
Senior Centers
Physicians
Decision Support Techniques
Private Practice
Surgeons
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • acute care surgery
  • communication tool
  • palliative care
  • shared decision-making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

"best case/worst case" : Qualitative evaluation of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decisions. / Kruser, Jacqueline M.; Nabozny, Michael J.; Steffens, Nicole M.; Brasel, Karen; Campbell, Toby C.; Gaines, Martha E.; Schwarze, Margaret L.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 63, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 1805-1811.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kruser, Jacqueline M. ; Nabozny, Michael J. ; Steffens, Nicole M. ; Brasel, Karen ; Campbell, Toby C. ; Gaines, Martha E. ; Schwarze, Margaret L. / "best case/worst case" : Qualitative evaluation of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decisions. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2015 ; Vol. 63, No. 9. pp. 1805-1811.
@article{14ba8d37a4fc4c839cb6dedebe912e15,
title = "{"}best case/worst case{"}: Qualitative evaluation of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decisions",
abstract = "Objectives To evaluate a communication tool called {"}Best Case/Worst Case{"} (BC/WC) based on an established conceptual model of shared decision-making. Design Focus group study. Setting Older adults (four focus groups) and surgeons (two focus groups) using modified questions from the Decision Aid Acceptability Scale and the Decisional Conflict Scale to evaluate and revise the communication tool. Participants Individuals aged 60 and older recruited from senior centers (n = 37) and surgeons from academic and private practices in Wisconsin (n = 17). Measurements Qualitative content analysis was used to explore themes and concepts that focus group respondents identified. Results Seniors and surgeons praised the tool for the unambiguous illustration of multiple treatment options and the clarity gained from presentation of an array of treatment outcomes. Participants noted that the tool provides an opportunity for in-the-moment, preference-based deliberation about options and a platform for further discussion with other clinicians and loved ones. Older adults worried that the format of the tool was not universally accessible for people with different educational backgrounds, and surgeons had concerns that the tool was vulnerable to physicians' subjective biases. Conclusion The BC/WC tool is a novel decision support intervention that may help facilitate difficult decision-making for older adults and their physicians when considering invasive, acute medical treatments such as surgery.",
keywords = "acute care surgery, communication tool, palliative care, shared decision-making",
author = "Kruser, {Jacqueline M.} and Nabozny, {Michael J.} and Steffens, {Nicole M.} and Karen Brasel and Campbell, {Toby C.} and Gaines, {Martha E.} and Schwarze, {Margaret L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jgs.13615",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "1805--1811",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "best case/worst case"

T2 - Qualitative evaluation of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decisions

AU - Kruser, Jacqueline M.

AU - Nabozny, Michael J.

AU - Steffens, Nicole M.

AU - Brasel, Karen

AU - Campbell, Toby C.

AU - Gaines, Martha E.

AU - Schwarze, Margaret L.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Objectives To evaluate a communication tool called "Best Case/Worst Case" (BC/WC) based on an established conceptual model of shared decision-making. Design Focus group study. Setting Older adults (four focus groups) and surgeons (two focus groups) using modified questions from the Decision Aid Acceptability Scale and the Decisional Conflict Scale to evaluate and revise the communication tool. Participants Individuals aged 60 and older recruited from senior centers (n = 37) and surgeons from academic and private practices in Wisconsin (n = 17). Measurements Qualitative content analysis was used to explore themes and concepts that focus group respondents identified. Results Seniors and surgeons praised the tool for the unambiguous illustration of multiple treatment options and the clarity gained from presentation of an array of treatment outcomes. Participants noted that the tool provides an opportunity for in-the-moment, preference-based deliberation about options and a platform for further discussion with other clinicians and loved ones. Older adults worried that the format of the tool was not universally accessible for people with different educational backgrounds, and surgeons had concerns that the tool was vulnerable to physicians' subjective biases. Conclusion The BC/WC tool is a novel decision support intervention that may help facilitate difficult decision-making for older adults and their physicians when considering invasive, acute medical treatments such as surgery.

AB - Objectives To evaluate a communication tool called "Best Case/Worst Case" (BC/WC) based on an established conceptual model of shared decision-making. Design Focus group study. Setting Older adults (four focus groups) and surgeons (two focus groups) using modified questions from the Decision Aid Acceptability Scale and the Decisional Conflict Scale to evaluate and revise the communication tool. Participants Individuals aged 60 and older recruited from senior centers (n = 37) and surgeons from academic and private practices in Wisconsin (n = 17). Measurements Qualitative content analysis was used to explore themes and concepts that focus group respondents identified. Results Seniors and surgeons praised the tool for the unambiguous illustration of multiple treatment options and the clarity gained from presentation of an array of treatment outcomes. Participants noted that the tool provides an opportunity for in-the-moment, preference-based deliberation about options and a platform for further discussion with other clinicians and loved ones. Older adults worried that the format of the tool was not universally accessible for people with different educational backgrounds, and surgeons had concerns that the tool was vulnerable to physicians' subjective biases. Conclusion The BC/WC tool is a novel decision support intervention that may help facilitate difficult decision-making for older adults and their physicians when considering invasive, acute medical treatments such as surgery.

KW - acute care surgery

KW - communication tool

KW - palliative care

KW - shared decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942200289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942200289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jgs.13615

DO - 10.1111/jgs.13615

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 1805

EP - 1811

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 9

ER -