Benefits of partnered strength training for prostate cancer survivors and spouses

results from a randomized controlled trial of the Exercising Together project

Kerri Winters-Stone, Karen Lyons, Jessica Dobek, Nathan Dieckmann, Jill Bennett, Lillian Nail, Tomasz (Tom) Beer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer can negatively impact quality of life of the patient and his spouse caregiver, but interventions rarely target the health of both partners simultaneously. We tested the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a partnered strength training program on the physical and mental health of prostate cancer survivors (PCS) and spouse caregivers. Methods: Sixty-four couples were randomly assigned to 6 months of partnered strength training (Exercising Together, N = 32) or usual care (UC, N = 32). Objective measures included body composition (lean, fat and trunk fat mass (kg), and % body fat) by DXA, upper and lower body muscle strength by 1-repetition maximum, and physical function by the physical performance battery (PPB). Self-reported measures included the physical and mental health summary scales and physical function and fatigue subscales of the SF-36 and physical activity with the CHAMPS questionnaire. Results: Couple retention rates were 100 % for Exercising Together and 84 % for UC. Median attendance of couples to Exercising Together sessions was 75 %. Men in Exercising Together became stronger in the upper body (p <0.01) and more physically active (p <0.01) than UC. Women in Exercising Together increased muscle mass (p = 0.05) and improved upper (p <0.01) and lower body (p <0.01) strength and PPB scores (p = 0.01) more than UC. Conclusions: Exercising Together is a novel couples-based approach to exercise that was feasible and improved several health outcomes for both PCS and their spouses. Implications for cancer survivors: A couples-based approach should be considered in cancer survivorship programs so that outcomes can mutually benefit both partners. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00954044

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cancer Survivorship
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 29 2015

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Spouses
Survivors
Prostatic Neoplasms
Randomized Controlled Trials
Caregivers
Mental Health
Fats
Exercise
Health
Muscle Strength
Body Composition
Fatigue
Adipose Tissue
Neoplasms
Survival Rate
Quality of Life
Education
Muscles

Keywords

  • Caregiver
  • Dyads
  • Neoplasms
  • Physical activity
  • Physical functioning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

@article{a0164fefd7ee4ed4b53a2dd16985a76c,
title = "Benefits of partnered strength training for prostate cancer survivors and spouses: results from a randomized controlled trial of the Exercising Together project",
abstract = "Background: Prostate cancer can negatively impact quality of life of the patient and his spouse caregiver, but interventions rarely target the health of both partners simultaneously. We tested the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a partnered strength training program on the physical and mental health of prostate cancer survivors (PCS) and spouse caregivers. Methods: Sixty-four couples were randomly assigned to 6 months of partnered strength training (Exercising Together, N = 32) or usual care (UC, N = 32). Objective measures included body composition (lean, fat and trunk fat mass (kg), and {\%} body fat) by DXA, upper and lower body muscle strength by 1-repetition maximum, and physical function by the physical performance battery (PPB). Self-reported measures included the physical and mental health summary scales and physical function and fatigue subscales of the SF-36 and physical activity with the CHAMPS questionnaire. Results: Couple retention rates were 100 {\%} for Exercising Together and 84 {\%} for UC. Median attendance of couples to Exercising Together sessions was 75 {\%}. Men in Exercising Together became stronger in the upper body (p <0.01) and more physically active (p <0.01) than UC. Women in Exercising Together increased muscle mass (p = 0.05) and improved upper (p <0.01) and lower body (p <0.01) strength and PPB scores (p = 0.01) more than UC. Conclusions: Exercising Together is a novel couples-based approach to exercise that was feasible and improved several health outcomes for both PCS and their spouses. Implications for cancer survivors: A couples-based approach should be considered in cancer survivorship programs so that outcomes can mutually benefit both partners. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00954044",
keywords = "Caregiver, Dyads, Neoplasms, Physical activity, Physical functioning",
author = "Kerri Winters-Stone and Karen Lyons and Jessica Dobek and Nathan Dieckmann and Jill Bennett and Lillian Nail and Beer, {Tomasz (Tom)}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1007/s11764-015-0509-0",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Survivorship",
issn = "1932-2259",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits of partnered strength training for prostate cancer survivors and spouses

T2 - results from a randomized controlled trial of the Exercising Together project

AU - Winters-Stone, Kerri

AU - Lyons, Karen

AU - Dobek, Jessica

AU - Dieckmann, Nathan

AU - Bennett, Jill

AU - Nail, Lillian

AU - Beer, Tomasz (Tom)

PY - 2015/12/29

Y1 - 2015/12/29

N2 - Background: Prostate cancer can negatively impact quality of life of the patient and his spouse caregiver, but interventions rarely target the health of both partners simultaneously. We tested the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a partnered strength training program on the physical and mental health of prostate cancer survivors (PCS) and spouse caregivers. Methods: Sixty-four couples were randomly assigned to 6 months of partnered strength training (Exercising Together, N = 32) or usual care (UC, N = 32). Objective measures included body composition (lean, fat and trunk fat mass (kg), and % body fat) by DXA, upper and lower body muscle strength by 1-repetition maximum, and physical function by the physical performance battery (PPB). Self-reported measures included the physical and mental health summary scales and physical function and fatigue subscales of the SF-36 and physical activity with the CHAMPS questionnaire. Results: Couple retention rates were 100 % for Exercising Together and 84 % for UC. Median attendance of couples to Exercising Together sessions was 75 %. Men in Exercising Together became stronger in the upper body (p <0.01) and more physically active (p <0.01) than UC. Women in Exercising Together increased muscle mass (p = 0.05) and improved upper (p <0.01) and lower body (p <0.01) strength and PPB scores (p = 0.01) more than UC. Conclusions: Exercising Together is a novel couples-based approach to exercise that was feasible and improved several health outcomes for both PCS and their spouses. Implications for cancer survivors: A couples-based approach should be considered in cancer survivorship programs so that outcomes can mutually benefit both partners. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00954044

AB - Background: Prostate cancer can negatively impact quality of life of the patient and his spouse caregiver, but interventions rarely target the health of both partners simultaneously. We tested the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a partnered strength training program on the physical and mental health of prostate cancer survivors (PCS) and spouse caregivers. Methods: Sixty-four couples were randomly assigned to 6 months of partnered strength training (Exercising Together, N = 32) or usual care (UC, N = 32). Objective measures included body composition (lean, fat and trunk fat mass (kg), and % body fat) by DXA, upper and lower body muscle strength by 1-repetition maximum, and physical function by the physical performance battery (PPB). Self-reported measures included the physical and mental health summary scales and physical function and fatigue subscales of the SF-36 and physical activity with the CHAMPS questionnaire. Results: Couple retention rates were 100 % for Exercising Together and 84 % for UC. Median attendance of couples to Exercising Together sessions was 75 %. Men in Exercising Together became stronger in the upper body (p <0.01) and more physically active (p <0.01) than UC. Women in Exercising Together increased muscle mass (p = 0.05) and improved upper (p <0.01) and lower body (p <0.01) strength and PPB scores (p = 0.01) more than UC. Conclusions: Exercising Together is a novel couples-based approach to exercise that was feasible and improved several health outcomes for both PCS and their spouses. Implications for cancer survivors: A couples-based approach should be considered in cancer survivorship programs so that outcomes can mutually benefit both partners. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00954044

KW - Caregiver

KW - Dyads

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Physical activity

KW - Physical functioning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951925960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951925960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11764-015-0509-0

DO - 10.1007/s11764-015-0509-0

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Cancer Survivorship

JF - Journal of Cancer Survivorship

SN - 1932-2259

ER -