Behavioral self-monitoring of safety and productivity in the workplace

A methodological primer and quantitative literature review

Ryan Olson, Jamey Winchester

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Workplace applications of behavioral self-monitoring (BSM) methods have been studied periodically for over 35 years, yet the literature has never been systematically reviewed. Recent occupational safety interventions including BSM resulted in relatively large behavior changes. Moreover, BSM methods are functional for addressing a broad range of occupational health psychology topics. Studies (n = 24) where workers self-monitored productivity or safety behaviors were reviewed and scored along dimensions relevant to research and practice. For intervention conditions (n = 38), standardized effect sizes ranged from 0.2 to 14.5 (weighted average d = 2.8). The results encourage the use of BSM in workplace interventions, but the literature has insufficiently addressed the isolated and additive effects of BSM, worker involvement and individual differences, assessment applications, and theory testing and development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-75
Number of pages67
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior Management
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 29 2008

Fingerprint

Occupational Health
Workplace
Productivity
Behavioral Medicine
Safety
Monitoring
Individuality
Research
Self-monitoring
Literature review
Work place
Health
Testing
Workers

Keywords

  • Literature review
  • Productivity
  • Safety
  • Self-monitoring
  • Workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{3bdef3b24de94eaa8fb7341899e2dff0,
title = "Behavioral self-monitoring of safety and productivity in the workplace: A methodological primer and quantitative literature review",
abstract = "Workplace applications of behavioral self-monitoring (BSM) methods have been studied periodically for over 35 years, yet the literature has never been systematically reviewed. Recent occupational safety interventions including BSM resulted in relatively large behavior changes. Moreover, BSM methods are functional for addressing a broad range of occupational health psychology topics. Studies (n = 24) where workers self-monitored productivity or safety behaviors were reviewed and scored along dimensions relevant to research and practice. For intervention conditions (n = 38), standardized effect sizes ranged from 0.2 to 14.5 (weighted average d = 2.8). The results encourage the use of BSM in workplace interventions, but the literature has insufficiently addressed the isolated and additive effects of BSM, worker involvement and individual differences, assessment applications, and theory testing and development.",
keywords = "Literature review, Productivity, Safety, Self-monitoring, Workplace",
author = "Ryan Olson and Jamey Winchester",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1080/01608060802006823",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "9--75",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Behavior Management",
issn = "0160-8061",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral self-monitoring of safety and productivity in the workplace

T2 - A methodological primer and quantitative literature review

AU - Olson, Ryan

AU - Winchester, Jamey

PY - 2008/4/29

Y1 - 2008/4/29

N2 - Workplace applications of behavioral self-monitoring (BSM) methods have been studied periodically for over 35 years, yet the literature has never been systematically reviewed. Recent occupational safety interventions including BSM resulted in relatively large behavior changes. Moreover, BSM methods are functional for addressing a broad range of occupational health psychology topics. Studies (n = 24) where workers self-monitored productivity or safety behaviors were reviewed and scored along dimensions relevant to research and practice. For intervention conditions (n = 38), standardized effect sizes ranged from 0.2 to 14.5 (weighted average d = 2.8). The results encourage the use of BSM in workplace interventions, but the literature has insufficiently addressed the isolated and additive effects of BSM, worker involvement and individual differences, assessment applications, and theory testing and development.

AB - Workplace applications of behavioral self-monitoring (BSM) methods have been studied periodically for over 35 years, yet the literature has never been systematically reviewed. Recent occupational safety interventions including BSM resulted in relatively large behavior changes. Moreover, BSM methods are functional for addressing a broad range of occupational health psychology topics. Studies (n = 24) where workers self-monitored productivity or safety behaviors were reviewed and scored along dimensions relevant to research and practice. For intervention conditions (n = 38), standardized effect sizes ranged from 0.2 to 14.5 (weighted average d = 2.8). The results encourage the use of BSM in workplace interventions, but the literature has insufficiently addressed the isolated and additive effects of BSM, worker involvement and individual differences, assessment applications, and theory testing and development.

KW - Literature review

KW - Productivity

KW - Safety

KW - Self-monitoring

KW - Workplace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650033404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650033404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01608060802006823

DO - 10.1080/01608060802006823

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 9

EP - 75

JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

SN - 0160-8061

IS - 1

ER -