Behavioral control in alcohol use disorders: Relationships with severity

Eric D. Claus, Sarah Feldstein Ewing, Francesca M. Filbey, Kent E. Hutchison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The current study examined the relationship between severity of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and the neural circuits that underlie response inhibition and error monitoring. In addition, we explored pre- and post-inhibition trial processes to determine the potential causal mechanisms responsible for disinhibition in AUDs. Method: One hundred sixty-four individuals with a range of drinking from non-treatment-seeking adults with problematic alcohol use to treatment-seeking adults with alcohol dependence completed a Go/ NoGo task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Correlations between signal change during response inhibition and a composite measure of AUD severity revealed significant negative relationships in right insula/inferior frontal gyrus, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior parietal lobe. Relationships with error monitoring-related response largely overlapped with that of correct inhibitions but also included rostral anterior cingulate cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus, such that more severe AUDs were associated with reduced response in these regions. Last, examination of pre- and postinhibition processes suggested that more severe AUDs are associated with greater engagement of motor response circuits before inhibition trials, suggesting greater pre-potent tendencies that may lead to disinhibition. Conclusions: The current results extend previous work by examining how variation in AUD severity is related to neural response during response inhibition and potential causal mechanisms responsible for impaired inhibitory control. More severe AUDs were associated with reduced engagement of neural circuits involved in behavioral control and enhanced pre-potent responding. This altered control may contribute to the progression of AUDs, as well as relapse after treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-151
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Volume74
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

alcohol
Alcohols
Gyrus Cinguli
Prefrontal Cortex
Networks (circuits)
monitoring
Parietal Lobe
Monitoring
relapse
Inhibition (Psychology)
Alcoholism
Drinking
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Recurrence
examination
Composite materials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Behavioral control in alcohol use disorders : Relationships with severity. / Claus, Eric D.; Feldstein Ewing, Sarah; Filbey, Francesca M.; Hutchison, Kent E.

In: Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Vol. 74, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 141-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Claus, Eric D. ; Feldstein Ewing, Sarah ; Filbey, Francesca M. ; Hutchison, Kent E. / Behavioral control in alcohol use disorders : Relationships with severity. In: Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2013 ; Vol. 74, No. 1. pp. 141-151.
@article{108356f8a85b4c008b14893f8a50d9b6,
title = "Behavioral control in alcohol use disorders: Relationships with severity",
abstract = "Objective: The current study examined the relationship between severity of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and the neural circuits that underlie response inhibition and error monitoring. In addition, we explored pre- and post-inhibition trial processes to determine the potential causal mechanisms responsible for disinhibition in AUDs. Method: One hundred sixty-four individuals with a range of drinking from non-treatment-seeking adults with problematic alcohol use to treatment-seeking adults with alcohol dependence completed a Go/ NoGo task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Correlations between signal change during response inhibition and a composite measure of AUD severity revealed significant negative relationships in right insula/inferior frontal gyrus, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior parietal lobe. Relationships with error monitoring-related response largely overlapped with that of correct inhibitions but also included rostral anterior cingulate cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus, such that more severe AUDs were associated with reduced response in these regions. Last, examination of pre- and postinhibition processes suggested that more severe AUDs are associated with greater engagement of motor response circuits before inhibition trials, suggesting greater pre-potent tendencies that may lead to disinhibition. Conclusions: The current results extend previous work by examining how variation in AUD severity is related to neural response during response inhibition and potential causal mechanisms responsible for impaired inhibitory control. More severe AUDs were associated with reduced engagement of neural circuits involved in behavioral control and enhanced pre-potent responding. This altered control may contribute to the progression of AUDs, as well as relapse after treatment.",
author = "Claus, {Eric D.} and {Feldstein Ewing}, Sarah and Filbey, {Francesca M.} and Hutchison, {Kent E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "141--151",
journal = "Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs",
issn = "1937-1888",
publisher = "Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral control in alcohol use disorders

T2 - Relationships with severity

AU - Claus, Eric D.

AU - Feldstein Ewing, Sarah

AU - Filbey, Francesca M.

AU - Hutchison, Kent E.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Objective: The current study examined the relationship between severity of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and the neural circuits that underlie response inhibition and error monitoring. In addition, we explored pre- and post-inhibition trial processes to determine the potential causal mechanisms responsible for disinhibition in AUDs. Method: One hundred sixty-four individuals with a range of drinking from non-treatment-seeking adults with problematic alcohol use to treatment-seeking adults with alcohol dependence completed a Go/ NoGo task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Correlations between signal change during response inhibition and a composite measure of AUD severity revealed significant negative relationships in right insula/inferior frontal gyrus, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior parietal lobe. Relationships with error monitoring-related response largely overlapped with that of correct inhibitions but also included rostral anterior cingulate cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus, such that more severe AUDs were associated with reduced response in these regions. Last, examination of pre- and postinhibition processes suggested that more severe AUDs are associated with greater engagement of motor response circuits before inhibition trials, suggesting greater pre-potent tendencies that may lead to disinhibition. Conclusions: The current results extend previous work by examining how variation in AUD severity is related to neural response during response inhibition and potential causal mechanisms responsible for impaired inhibitory control. More severe AUDs were associated with reduced engagement of neural circuits involved in behavioral control and enhanced pre-potent responding. This altered control may contribute to the progression of AUDs, as well as relapse after treatment.

AB - Objective: The current study examined the relationship between severity of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and the neural circuits that underlie response inhibition and error monitoring. In addition, we explored pre- and post-inhibition trial processes to determine the potential causal mechanisms responsible for disinhibition in AUDs. Method: One hundred sixty-four individuals with a range of drinking from non-treatment-seeking adults with problematic alcohol use to treatment-seeking adults with alcohol dependence completed a Go/ NoGo task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Correlations between signal change during response inhibition and a composite measure of AUD severity revealed significant negative relationships in right insula/inferior frontal gyrus, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior parietal lobe. Relationships with error monitoring-related response largely overlapped with that of correct inhibitions but also included rostral anterior cingulate cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus, such that more severe AUDs were associated with reduced response in these regions. Last, examination of pre- and postinhibition processes suggested that more severe AUDs are associated with greater engagement of motor response circuits before inhibition trials, suggesting greater pre-potent tendencies that may lead to disinhibition. Conclusions: The current results extend previous work by examining how variation in AUD severity is related to neural response during response inhibition and potential causal mechanisms responsible for impaired inhibitory control. More severe AUDs were associated with reduced engagement of neural circuits involved in behavioral control and enhanced pre-potent responding. This altered control may contribute to the progression of AUDs, as well as relapse after treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870894260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870894260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23200160

AN - SCOPUS:84870894260

VL - 74

SP - 141

EP - 151

JO - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

JF - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

SN - 1937-1888

IS - 1

ER -